Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 138

Capitalising on China’s healthcare trends

China has proved a powerful partner in supporting the growth of Australian businesses, aided by our geographic proximity, political stability and governance-led business practices. We have a long and reliable history of high quality, reasonable cost goods and services manufacture which has led us to be ‘first-hand receivers’ of China’s attention when it comes to meeting the demands of its growing population.

Australian business sectors that have to date benefited from China’s attention have included the mining and resources sector, the tourism sector and most recently, those involved with the manufacture of health supplements and vitamins.

Changing Chinese demographics

Like many countries, China has an ageing population. According to an article, ‘How can China Care for its Ageing Population?’ distributed by the World Economic Forum, its population aged 65+ is forecast to grow to 167 million by 2020, accounting for 11.5% of the population or nearly double what it was in 1995. In addition, studies undertaken by the Wharton Business School state that China is now also facing an epidemic of chronic diseases and lifestyle issues (such as hypertension, stroke, diabetes and heart disease) that were typically associated with the ‘West’, mostly due to economic changes such as a growing middle class, rising GDP per capita and rising disposable income.

The cost of China’s evolving health and demographic trends has been enormous. It has been estimated that the country’s annual expenditure on health will grow at an average rate of 11.8% a year from 2014-2018, reaching a total spend of $892 billion by 2018. Yet according to a recent research paper issued by Deloitte, China’s healthcare spending, estimated at 5.4% of GDP in 2013, is still lower than other OECD countries, as shown in the chart below.

Growth and competition in healthcare

In response to the rising cost and need for healthcare services, the Chinese government recently announced several initiatives aimed at promoting growth and development in the health sector. According to research by Deloitte, ‘Projects that meet strict operational guidelines are expected to receive full government support, especially around land transfer, preferential financial and tax policies and related subsidies’. The research states that private and wholly owned foreign hospitals account for almost half of China’s total number of health care facilities and growth from this sector in China will bring the benefit of ‘leading medical technologies, advanced management, clinical practices and service models’. Additional service providers are considered good for competition, potentially leading to better pricing and satisfaction levels for patients. It may also help with raising the profile and use of private health insurance in the country, as commercial insurers develop plans to help consumers meet the rising cost of hospital care.

Of course, growth in the service and provision of healthcare services in the hospital and insurance areas in China will also promote growth in the supply chain such as in aged care, medical tourism and medical devices.

Australia’s recently agreed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with China promises unprecedented access for our healthcare providers to expand their services into China. The benefits of the FTA to the sector were summarised in a recent article published in Business Spectator titled ‘The China FTA is just the tonic for Australia’s healthcare operators’, by Kim O’Connell and Suzy Madar.

The article outlined the key benefits as:

  • For hospital providers, China now offers Australian businesses the opportunity to establish wholly foreign owned hospitals.
  • Medical and dental service suppliers can also establish Australian majority-owned joint venture hospitals and clinics with Chinese partners, provided the majority of medical professionals are Chinese.
  • In the aged care space, Australian providers may now establish wholly foreign-owned aged care facilities with tax incentives and fee waivers.
  • For R&D service providers, Australian companies looking to conduct R&D in China will be permitted both to carry out and offer R&D services through Australian-owned subsidiaries based in China.

Those ASX listed companies set to benefit from the growth and development of the healthcare service sector in China and the introduction of the FTA include Cochlear Limited (COH), CSL Limited (CSL) and Ramsay Healthcare Limited (RHC).

 

Sebastian Evans is Chief Investment Officer and Managing Director of NAOS Asset Management. This information is general only and does not take into consideration the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any reader. Readers should consider consulting a financial adviser before making any investment decision.

 

  •   10 December 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

Concerns about China's rise to power seem overblown

Aged care star ratings are a ‘fail’

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.