Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 222

CEO appointments: internal or external?

The appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and succession planning is one of the more important responsibilities of listed company boards. When a board starts the process of replacing a CEO, the company will typically announce both an internal and an external candidate search.

Commonwealth Bank and Fortescue Metals Group are currently searching for new CEOs with each company canvassing internal and external candidates. Over recent months, Blackmores and Wesfarmers have made CEO appointments from within their executive ranks, while Primary Health Care and G8 Education have opted for outsiders.

Shareholders may then wonder, is it better to appoint an internal or an external CEO?

Internal CEO appointments

Successful companies invariably have clear CEO succession plans to ensure the business is well-positioned to manage leadership transition. Based on our investing experience, boards of these companies tend to appoint ‘tried and tested’ candidates from within to ensure the business continues to employ the winning strategy and, more importantly, maintain its culture.

PWC’s latest annual study of CEO succession revealed that the rate of internal CEO appointments had reached an all-time high in Australia. The report also found that increased internal CEO appointments, coupled with better succession practices, have led the average CEO tenure rising to 5.5 years, which exceeds the global average of 5.2 years. The report’s authors found that insider CEOs not only stay in the role longer, they deliver better and more consistent shareholder returns compared with external hires.

Companies that have consistently and successfully promoted senior managers (including CEOs) from within their organisation include Macquarie Group (ASX:MQG), Wesfarmers (ASX:WES), Challenger (ASX:CGF) and Flight Centre Travel Group (ASX:FLT).

Notably, electronics retailer JB Hi-Fi (ASX:JBH) has appointed all three of its CEOs from within the company since it listed in 2003. Over that period, the company’s share price has risen from $1.55 to more than $22.60 at the time of writing.

[Register for our free weekly newsletter and receive our latest ebook, Cuffelinks Showcase]

External CEO appointments

Outsider CEO appointments have fallen sharply since 2004 according to PWC, with internal candidates providing obvious advantages. However, external CEO appointments can provide benefits too, particularly when the company needs to be reinvigorated.

When a company is underperforming, frequently its turnaround can only be achieved by an outsider, not a manager entrenched in the business’s operations. An effective CEO, often with a new management team, can rapidly turn around the company’s fortunes delivering shareholders returns via share price growth.

When an underperforming company appoints a new CEO, we look for a strong leader and a proven performer with an articulated strategy to turnaround the company and the support of the board to effect change. When the CEO has a clear mandate from the board to ‘shake things up’ this can be a catalyst for us to take a position in the company.

Clough Limited (no longer listed on the ASX) is a prime example of an external CEO who successfully implemented a turnaround strategy. The Perth-based engineering company had floundered for many years under the leadership of various CEOs before Kevin Gallagher took the helm in 2011. The new CEO overhauled the company’s operations, reducing fixed costs and transformed the organisational culture. During his two-year tenure, the company’s share price steadily climbed from around 65 cents a share and in 2013 shareholders received $1.46 a share when South African firm Murray and Roberts Holdings acquired Clough.

In our view, the best external CEO appointees have a track record of performance in the same or a comparable industry. For example, Shaun Di Gregorio was a key person in the early success of REA Group, as it transitioned from a start-up to the largest media company in Australia as owner of online real estate advertising portal In 2010, he was appointed CEO of Malaysia-based iProperty Group that serviced the Southeast Asian property market. Shaun brought the relevant skill set, knowledge and experience to iProperty and during his four-year tenure the company’s share price rose from around 15 cents to over $3.00 a share. iProperty was subsequently taken over by REA Group in 2016 for $4.00 a share.

Alignment of interests

Whether a CEO is an internal or an external appointment, it is critical to consider how their interests are aligned with the company’s shareholders through incentive structures. Ideally, remuneration is a combination of short- and long-term incentives that focus on earnings per share (EPS) and total shareholder return (TSR). For more, see my Cuffelinks article, 5 factors to look for when assessing management.

The CEO’s interests are further aligned when they are also a major shareholder in the company. This can also ensure their long-term commitment. In our experience, CEOs with substantial ‘skin in the game’ typically have longer than average tenure and outperform other comparable businesses.

Jamie Pherous, Managing Director at Corporate Travel Management (ASX:CTD) is a substantial shareholder in the company. As founder of the business, he has led Corporate Travel Management since listing in December 2010 at $1.00 a share. The company is trading at more than $22.00 per share at the time of writing.

On balance

Considering the merits of an internal versus an external CEO appointment is highly dependent on the company, including its performance and stage of growth. In our view, companies that appoint the CEO from within the organisation on balance deliver better returns for their shareholders than companies that recruit externally. However, turnaround stories from an external appointment can provide investors with good short-term trading opportunities. When evaluating any CEO, it is critical to consider how their interests are aligned with the company’s shareholders through incentive structures and equity exposure.


Chris Stott is Chief Investment Officer of Wilson Asset Management. Entities managed by Wilson Asset Management own shares in PRY, CBA, GEM, FLT, MQG and WES.


Why August company reporting season was poor

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.