Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 191

When a company is a money pit

“Assets collect risks around them in one form or another. Inventory is one risk, and accounts receivable is another risk.” – Michael Dell, founder and CEO of Dell Technologies.

All businesses face the ongoing challenge of generating cash flows in excess of their borrowings. If a business is unable to pay its debts owed, it is no longer a ‘going concern’ and will face reorganisation or liquidation. Nevertheless, profitability is not necessarily a prerequisite for a business’s ongoing survival. A business can keep losing money if investors keep pumping cash back in, often in the vain pursuit of growth opportunities that, for some reason, cannot be funded through existing profitable operations.

Watch for the death spiral

Some businesses may even have the duty to continue unprofitable operations if they need to keep servicing their debt, to the detriment of equity holders. This is the unhappy scenario where excess debt begets excess production and forced sales through reduced prices. Lower prices require higher production volumes to meet the same existing debt burden, and the death spiral continues.

Forced asset selling or ‘deleveraging’ is a variation on the same theme, as is the current predicament of cash-strapped energy producers. While the law of supply and demand suggests that they limit supply to drive up prices, the need for immediate cash flows defies this and ultimately lowers the return on their assets, perhaps changing the nature of the assets in the process.

“We started the company by building to the customer’s order. And, interestingly enough, we didn’t do it because we saw some massive paradigm in the future. Basically, we just didn’t have any capital to mass-produce.” – Michael Dell

Different types of capital and liquidity

Asset values and their power to generate profits are joined at the hip. Some would say that net profits provide the best way to value the assets of a business, since assets are only worth the cash flows they can generate. This is a useful concept, but it overlooks the overall convertibility of the assets, or how they fare in a liquidation scenario. The more capital intensive a business is, the less valuable its capital actually is, all things equal. If invested assets strain to generate profits as a going concern, they will likely strain to achieve satisfactory prices in liquidation. Similarly, the very fact that assets may be relatively liquid would likely prevent their ‘forced liquidation’ in the first place and accordingly, this should be considered when performing valuation analysis.

This points to a duality between the profitability and liquidity of assets as they pertain to the risks of the equity holder. Both imply an ease of converting assets into cash and, in this sense, may act as substitutes for each other in the reduction of equity risk. Equity investors, as a rule, forego the safety of cash to make their investments. To the extent they can get it back, they might have their cake and eat it too.

Recognising this duality can uncover more investment opportunities with a greater skew to positive outcomes. The good ones may be less exciting or glamourous unless you happen to like specialty chemicals or Pachinko balls. They often combine a modest upside with a very limited downside and can be fantastic investment opportunities since, while the equity risk is reduced, the participation in business or economic value-add is preserved.

Some investors bemoan ‘lazy balance sheets’ with excess cash and lower return on assets on paper, but they shouldn’t overlook the downside protection that this liquidity inherently provides. ‘Optimising’ balance sheets by leveraging up to juice equity returns comes with its own risks. Only to the extent that operational and business risks can be eliminated can leverage be safely applied, and history is littered with investors who have gotten this balance wrong, with nothing left to show for it.

"When leverage works, it magnifies your gains. Your spouse thinks you're clever, and your neighbors get envious," explained Warren Buffett in his 2010 Shareholder Letter. "But leverage is addictive. Once having profited from its wonders, very few people retreat to more conservative practices. And as we all learned in third grade — and some relearned in 2008 — any series of positive numbers, however impressive the numbers may be, evaporates when multiplied by a single zero. History tells us that leverage all too often produces zeroes, even when it is employed by very smart people."

Equity investors assume fundamental risks (e.g. the level of borrowings) and should be aware of the relative severity in their investments. If and when prevailing market prices permit them to capture most of the upside they expect from their equity investments, while severely limiting their downside, investing first principles should be the guide. Almost by definition, these opportunities are unlikely to be headline-grabbing growth stories that lead to exciting narratives and visions of the future.

 

Peter Bull is Head of Equities and Nimalan Govender is a Portfolio Manager at Morningstar Investment Management Australia. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

US shares: Ambitious multiples on ambitious EPS forecasts

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.