Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 474

The data doesn't lie: dividends on Resources versus Industrials

(Editor's introduction: Peter Thornhill is well-known to our readers for advocating a multi-decade investment strategy based on the long-term merits of industrial companies for income. For example, to show his consistency over time, some of his previous articles in Firstlinks are here and here and here. In this short update, he again checks the long-term return from industrial shares, but this time, he makes the comparison with resource stocks. He argues that for investors with the right risk capacity and investment horizon, there's only one place to invest).

***

The current resource bubble and the flow of healthy dividends will no doubt have many investors salivating. Whilst my long-term charts are based on calendar year, this article looks at the last three financial years to bring my analysis up-to-date.

The table below takes 2019 as the starting point and looks at the dividend changes for financial years ending 30 June 2020, 2021 and 2022 for Industrials, Resources and the All Ordinaries.

Resource dividends come and go

Clearly, the impact of Covid effected industrial companies as dividends were suspended or reduced during this unsettling period, while the spectacular jump in resource dividends was driven by surging prices and demand for commodities.

Resource bubbles are a fact of life and jolly fun for speculators, but we must not lose sight of the longer-term impact. Index funds will have been selling industrials to buy resource stocks and when the bubble bursts, they will be selling resources to buy back the industrials. I wait to see the impact on distributions from these index funds post the change.

The charts below cover the last 41 years of performance for the price and accumulation indices. A picture is worth a thousand words!

Digging stuff out of the ground is all well and good but the real value add comes from the manufacturing, intellectual and technological inputs, not labour.

 

Peter Thornhill is a financial commentator, author, public speaker and Principal of Motivated Money. He runs full-day courses explaining his approach to investing "in the vain hope that not everyone is frozen with fear".

Peter extends his thanks to Angus Gluskie, CEO of Whitefield, for his assistance with the data.

This article is general in nature and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Share markets can be volatile in the short term and investors holding a portfolio of shares will need to tolerate short-term losses and focus on a long-term horizon, and consider financial advice.

 

15 Comments
Steve
September 10, 2022

the anti-woke Coal & Energy stocks are pumping it currently. Even Buffett has loaded up.

CC
September 10, 2022

yes and in the future our great grandchildren will be so pleased that we caused so much damage to the world in the pursuit of quick money....

SMSF Trustee
September 10, 2022

CC the mining and use of fossil fuels has never been about quick money. Very much a long term game for those businesses. And fir society it's been about driving industries for long term growth, employment etc AND for keeping us warm in winter.

The arguments in favour of backing away - perhaps rapidly - from fossil fuels are mostly well-made, but yours isn't one of them. Focus instead on arguing for a better long-term future using renewable, which are becoming cheaper and more effective at carrying base loads and achieving the economic and social goals that fossil fuels have traditionally aimed for. Then you won't sound like just a ranting left-winger.

Truth
September 09, 2022

RBA has resources as higher. Stop cherry picking please. Over the long run, the different industrial sectors have generally performed quite similarly, although there have been periods of over and underperformance (Figure 2) https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2019/2019-04/australian-equity-market-facts-1917-2019.html

CC
September 10, 2022

Truth, that's an excellent article, thanks for sharing

James
September 07, 2022

There's no harm in holding some BHP, WDS, RIO, MIN, PBS etc for dividends, as part of a well diversified portfolio, especially for when the resource cycle is doing well and spitting out cash! In fact many LIC's (ARGO, AFI, BKI) do, the exception being WHF. Then again WHF also owns a lot of AREIT's which aren't always a good sector to be in! Moderation in all things perhaps? It's not black and white!

C
September 07, 2022

Agree. And the XMJ materials index has far outperformed the XPJ property index over the past 20 years, XMJ up over 300% versus less than 10% for the XPJ !!

michael
September 07, 2022

The chart my online broker produces says XMJ has gone from 10000 to 15500 over the last 10 yrs.
XPJ has gone from 940 to 1360.

Thats 55% for mining & 44% for REIT.

C
September 08, 2022

Michael, have a look at the 20 year comparison. XPJ absolutely slaughtered by the GFC

C
September 07, 2022

The world is a very different place than it was in the 80s and 90s. Back then mining stocks paid little if any dividends. The golden era for banks dividend growth driven by credit growth appears over. The geopolitical climate has created supply chain disruptions, rising inflation and commodity price growth which benefits resource companies. There is definitely some place in share portfolios for the better quality mining companies both for capital growth and dividends. Note that shareholders in MIN ( Mineral resources ) have earned over 25% annual average compound growth since the company listed almost 20 years ago, and BHP dividends over the past decade have more than paid for share purchase I made in 2005.

SMSF Trustee
September 07, 2022

Peter, how is that index funds will be doing that buying and selling? They don't trade the markets like that, they just hold what they have. So when resources run faster than industrials their holding as a % in resources will increase, yes. But not because they're buying at the top, they're just sitting on what the market is doing. If they get funds inflow then they will invest a little bit more in resources than they would have before the run up, but they're also buying industrials. It's not like they follow the momentum and only buy the better performing stocks at the time. That was an unwarranted throwaway line.

Jeremy
September 07, 2022

Correct, they only buy and sell when the index composition changes due to stocks entering or exiting or corporate events such as capital raising.

Geoff Burgess
September 07, 2022

Whilst a picture may be worth a thousand words, pictures can also be misleading. If the graphs had started in 2000 rather than 1979, the relativities might well be quite different. It all depends on the start date.

David
September 08, 2022

True. But how about if you started at 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?

I was looking on the chart for that point too, and found it.

Data like this always depends upon start and end dates and you can always pick a data set to suit whatever point you're making. Thornhill's reasons for starting at 1979 have been publicised before.

When working out my own investment strategy I ran modelling across different start and end dates as above, to see what happened. It's instructive.

Michael Toal
September 07, 2022

Fascinating short term information Peter

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Follow the market trajectory and stop the usual mistakes

The best strategy to build income for life

The familiar story on dividends, plus predictions for 2023

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Australian house price speculators: What were you thinking?

Australian housing’s 50-year boom was driven by falling rates and rising borrowing power — not rent or yield. With those drivers exhausted, future returns must reconcile with economic fundamentals. Are we ready?

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

Latest Updates

Shares

Why the ASX may be more expensive than the US market

On every valuation metric, the US appears significantly more expensive than Australia. However, American companies are also much more profitable than ours, which means the ASX may be more overvalued than most think.

Economy

No one holds the government to account on spending

Government spending is out of control and there's little sign that Labor will curb it. We need enforceable rules on spending and an empowered budget office to ensure governments act responsibly with taxpayers money.

Retirement

Why a traditional retirement may be pushed back 25 years

The idea of stopping work during your sixties is a man-made concept from another age. In a world where many jobs are knowledge based and can be done from anywhere, it may no longer make much sense at all.

Shares

The quiet winners of AI competition

The tech giants are in a money-throwing contest to secure AI supremacy and may fall short of high investor expectations. The companies supplying this arms race could offer a more attractive way to play AI adoption.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Infrastructure

Renewable energy investment: gloom or boom?

ESG investing has fallen out of favour with many investors, and Trump's anti-green policies haven't helped. Yet, renewables investment is still surging, which could prove a boon for infrastructure companies.

Investing

The enduring wisdom of John Bogle in five quotes

From buying the whole market to controlling emotions, John Bogle’s legendary advice reminds investors that patience, discipline, and low costs are the keys to investment success in any market environment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.