Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 553

Are expectations for the Magnificent Seven too high?

Investing is hard. Seeing stocks that you own fall in price and resisting the urge to sell takes a strong stomach. Seeing stocks that you find expensive soar without you is no fun, either. It takes discipline to tame the fear of missing out. That emotional rollercoaster means that in investing, knowledge is cyclical, not cumulative. We learn the same things over and over again. It’s rare to see something truly new.

As we’ve seen, the market’s current obsession is with artificial intelligence (or AI) and the ‘Magnificent Seven’: Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta and Tesla. As a group, they represented 70% of the S&P 500’s 2023 return. Standout winner Nvidia closed the year up 239%, while Apple, the relative laggard, returned 48%. Today, those seven companies command as much market value as the ‘Foreign Five’ (China, Japan, India, France, and UK) – the largest developed stockmarkets outside the US by market value.

While these tech giants have dominated the headlines in recent years, this phenomenon is nothing new. Before our recent market darlings, we had the FANG quartet (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Google). Go back even further and you’ll find the BUNCH companies—Burroughs, Univac, NCR, Control Data and Honeywell—the forgotten darlings of the mainframe computing era. After soaring to dizzying heights for many years, they too eventually came back down to earth.

So, what lessons can we learn from history and are there any markers that can help navigate the current zeitgeist?

Valuations vs expectations

The key is in valuations and expectations. Stocks go up when results are better than investors anticipated. So, you make money by owning businesses as their outlook brightens. Sometimes that means buying the business when others think the outlook is dim. The higher the valuation, the higher the expectations, and the greater the scope for potential disappointment.

Today, the valuations of some of the mega-cap giants are incredibly high. That sets a high bar. For some of them, expectations are so high that they must deliver blindingly fast growth simply to justify their current prices.

Take Microsoft, for example. While Microsoft may make $101 billion in operating profit, the market then expects it to grow at 10-15% a year – so it needs to grow profits by $10-15 billion a year, compounded over time. That’s like growing a brand-new Coca Cola in 2024, and then another in 2025, and so on.

Even the growth expectations for Nvidia are astounding. In 2023, as a whole, Nvidia presented revenues of almost $61 billion, up 126% from a year ago. Having beat market expectations in the fourth quarter, Wall Street expects Nvidia to grow by 35% per annum for at least half a decade. Even for the best companies in the world, such growth rates are really hard to sustain.

The trouble is that growth potential is clear to everybody. So those expectations are already reflected in the stock’s price. Today, that price is high. Nvidia trades at 20 times estimates for next year’s sales. That’s 20 times the top line, before any expenses. It’s not impossible for a business to deliver the sort of growth now expected of Nvidia. It’s just exceedingly rare.

The sobering reality

We decided to see how rare. Since 1990, just 230 stocks in the FTSE World Index have ever sustained 30% revenue growth for more than five years. That’s just 7% of the 3,400 relevant stocks in the Index. The feat is even rarer for large companies. Just 45 businesses have ever delivered that kind of growth after cracking the top 200 of the Index.

The hit rate is higher for huge expensive companies, suggesting that markets do have some signal. 23% of huge companies trading for more than 10 times sales have gone on to sustain 30% revenue growth. But that is less encouraging than it first appears. The flip side is that three-quarters of the time, it doesn’t play out. Three-quarters of the time, huge expensive companies don’t deliver the blazing growth now expected of Nvidia.

Valuations reflect expectations and in the investing world, high expectations can often lead to disappointment. If we take a long view of history, that’s often the pattern and valuations are often highest just after a company has burned brightest. 

Beyond the Magnificent Seven

Fortunately, there is an alternative to chasing the leading lights. Look beyond the Magnificent Seven, and there are thousands of companies out there—many of which will have brighter futures than the market now expects. In 2023 alone, many good-sized companies returned more than Apple’s 48% return.

But the spotlight doesn’t shine on these businesses. It’s hard to tame the fear of missing out, especially when the companies leading the way continue to beat expectations quarter after quarter. But rather than crowding into giant companies that must continue to shine brightly just to hold their prices, we much prefer to invest in companies that trade at discounted valuations and are trying to clear a lower bar. It is more rewarding to be there before their time to shine.

The important thing is that with such an uncertain backdrop, now is a critical time for investors to be open-minded and adaptive—as continuing to stick with past winners is no guarantee of success, especially when the valuations trend of the Magnificent Seven begin to strongly resemble the Nifty Fifty of the 1970s.

 

Shane Woldendorp is an Investment Counsellor at Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information at a point in time and not personal financial or investment advice. It should not be used as a guide to invest or trade and does not take into account the specific investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person. The Orbis Funds may take a different view depending on facts and circumstances.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

  •   27 March 2024
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The 'Heady Hundred' case for unglamorous growth

21 reasons we’re nearing the end of a secular bull market

The case for and against US stock market exceptionalism

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.