Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 246

Higher funding costs loom for lower quality assets

The volatility genie is out now and is unlikely to go back in the bottle as late cycle fiscal expansion in the US, combined with higher global funding rates will have markets on their toes going forward.

The liquidation of the short volatility fund XIV (Velocity Shares Daily Inverse VIX) in February 2018 could be the Bear Stearns peek behind the curtain before a larger Lehman crescendo. The now-liquidated XIV product did exactly what it was designed to do, making a small amount of money each day for being short volatility until in one single day everything was lost. Any ETF owners of risky assets (particularly credit ETFs) should be wriggling in their chairs right now, for the XIV was totally a victim of its own success. The volatility community knew full well the thresholds required to trigger a XIV liquidation, and surely helped itself to a grand feast pushing volatility higher and higher until the XIV fund was forced to enter the market and cover risk at high prices, thereby guaranteeing its own death spiral.

Credit ETFs have systemic weakness too

We have long argued that higher funding costs will be a huge problem for lower quality assets in a highly leveraged world, as higher funding costs not only create an income shock in the near term, but also lift refinancing hurdles over time.

As funding costs are rising and liquidity is being withdrawn (illustrated with LIBOR rates rising), investors need to think through liquidity sources, their individual liquidity needs going forward as the tide goes out, as well as the asymmetry of some current portfolio holdings.

Certain parts of the credit market (particularly ‘perceived’ high returning liquid credit and high yield) often re-price in an asymmetrical manner. We need look no further than a well-known highly leveraged US infrastructure fund that recently lost around 40% of its value in one day after provisioning for higher funding and debt obligation costs.

Warren Buffet’s famous quote, “You never know who's swimming naked until the tide goes out”, is a perfect illustration for the current leveraged environment. In adding large US fiscal deficits to a late cycle environment, plus the addition or continuation of higher funding pressure via US rate hikes, the tide is most certainly going out right now for certain parts of the credit spectrum (i.e. lower parts of the capital stack). Often at the end of a cycle, we get a systemic shock: a company or group of companies that fail unexpectedly from sailing too close to the wind.

The danger for credit ETFs comes from the massive credit liquidity gap that now exists between credit debt outstanding (which in the US has roughly doubled since the GFC) and primary dealer inventories which have shrunk more than sixfold. To put that in context, the credit liquidity gap is now twelve times the size it was going into the GFC, when credit products froze and were gated for long periods, on one twelfth of the liquidity mismatch. The rise of credit ETFs gives the market a host of products that they can collectively target in adverse circumstances, forcing them to rebalance into weakness without any circuit breakers seen in equity markets.

Good news velocity turned negative as higher rates are biting

We retain our view that the US Federal Reserve will likely hike interest rates three times in 2018 (this alone will keep pressure on low quality risk assets via funding costs), however, the extrapolation by some pundits of the late 2017 environment is short sighted. We need to consider the ‘flow’ of markets rather than just focusing on the ‘stock’.

Global economic data has been nothing short of great over the later part of 2017 and early 2018. However, the velocity of that data has now turned negative and the sell-off in US bond markets is having an impact. Some isolated recent global data to indicate this include: US durable goods orders -3.6%, US factory orders -1.4%, Germany factory orders -3.9%, and very weak global retail sales. London house prices dropping at the fastest pace since 2009 (Wandsworth/Fulham lost 15%), and US mortgage applications -6.6%. Data has been decaying quickly with a large geographical reach.

Quantitative tightening needs a bond buyer

Calendar 2018 is shaping to be a pivotal year. Political policy is changing, monetary policy is being normalised and asset markets will be asked to stand alone with less central bank intervention. Higher volatility is almost certainly here to stay, making investors demand more in return for the higher volatility risk they must endure.

There is widespread market concern about the withdrawal of global central bank balance sheet accumulation, known as Quantitative Tightening (QT). This term was first used in early 2016 when the Chinese central bank was selling $100 billion dollars of US Treasuries a month to stem capital outflow from China. Many then wrongly assumed yields would rise sharply given the world’s biggest bond buyer had become a net seller. In fact, yields fell and bonds rallied through this period as a ‘flight to quality’ bid emerged from the private system as other risk asset markets decayed.

Fast forward to 2018 and QT is again topical, as central banks have telegraphed a decline in balance sheet growth. However, that isn’t the full story for the bond market, because the existing ‘stock’ of previous Quantitative Easing (QE) actually creates new ‘flow’. When bonds on central bank balance sheets mature, their proceeds have to be reinvested just to keep the 'stock' of balance sheet from shrinking. In other words, even in QE the 'stock' itself generates 'flow'. And as the stock gets bigger, so do the reinvestment flows: in 2018 total QE reinvestment flows will be some US$990 billion, vs US$600 billion in 2016 and 2017. Those reinvestment flows already outstrip balance sheet expansion, with global central bank balance sheet expansion slowing down, reinvestment flows have already become larger than 'new' QE flows.

AUD bond rates below US Treasuries

Our expectation is that the RBA remains firmly on hold in 2018 whilst the US Federal Reserve continues to lift interest rates. We expect this interest rate decoupling to continue and as a result pressure to build on the AUD currency over the year.

The huge fiscal expansion in the US (despite being in the 10th year of recovery) has forced US bond yields higher due to vastly increased US bond supply. This has taken Australian interest rates below that of the US across all key maturity points on term structure curves for the first time since the year 2000. The continued de-coupling of US and Australian interest rates reflects the vastly differing economic outlooks and budgetary positions between the two nations. Interestingly the last time these yield differentials were negative, the AUD was around 0.50 cents to a USD, rather than today’s 0.78 cents.

 

Charlie Jamieson is Executive Director and CIO of Jamieson Coote Bonds. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media’s impact is changing markets

Five factors driving the great Australian recovery

Four themes to set your portfolio for economic recovery

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 424 with weekend update

Wet streets cause rain. The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect is a name created by writer Michael Crichton after he realised that everything he read or heard in the media was wrong when he had direct personal knowledge or expertise on the subject. He surmised that everything else is probably wrong as well, and financial markets are no exception.

  • 9 September 2021

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.

Retirement

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.