Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 178

Is the housing market in bubble territory?

Housing is expensive in Australia. Measured as a multiple of average wages, Sydney residential property costs nearly 1½ times that of London and over twice that of New York. All eight of Australia’s capital cities are dearer than Boston, Washington, Chicago, and Tokyo.

But let’s put housing in a wealth perspective. The diagram below shows the assets and liabilities of Australia’s households using the latest official ABS data (2015). Housing represented 53% of all assets, but a lower 45% if net of mortgage debt. Even adding in household durables (furniture, appliances, cars etcetera) doesn’t bring the total to half of net assets, so the majority of our net assets now resides in financial and commercial products.

We have over 10 million dwellings which had a total value of $5.9 trillion in 2016, or 3½ times Australia’s annual GDP. There were almost three times as many houses as flats and apartments, the average dwelling costs just over four times average household income, and was valued at $584,000 in June this year.

Our density is just over 2.5 persons per dwelling, half that in 1901. Our dwellings are now much bigger, nearly three times, with three or more bedroom dwellings accounting for almost three-quarters of all residential properties. The table below adds some more perspective.

Australians borrowed $400 billion last fiscal year for new housing plus alterations and additions to existing dwellings. We can afford all this on top of existing debt, as the two following charts suggest. Debt servicing is as low as it’s been in five decades, due to record low interest rates.

Our capital cities

Australia’s population is one of the most urbanised on the planet, leaving aside city-states such as Singapore and Hong Kong, but prices across our capital cities vary enormously.

Sydney is the odd-one-out given its prices are so far ahead of the second priciest market Melbourne. The two charts below suggest the degree to which Sydney prices seem to be well over trend compared with Melbourne.

The difference is even more marked when we compare just apartments. Sydney had been under-supplied for nearly a decade, whereas Melbourne had gone into overdrive, leaving Sydney over the past year a sellers-market (prices over-trend by 12-13%) and Melbourne the opposite: a buyers-market, with prices 7-8% under-trend.

The indications are that price growth is abating as we head into 2017. In FY16 prices have fallen a little in Canberra and more in the mining states with their capitals - Darwin and Perth. – falling by 5% or more over the 12-month period.

So what?

Firstly, Australia’s economy is not threatened by its world-leading dwelling prices: they are affordable as seen by the earlier debt servicing graph where the ratio is the lowest in some five decades. The chart below reinforces the fact that we have lived with an affordability ratio in the high range (3½-4 times household incomes) for a decade and a half, without dire things happening.

Yes, Australia’s household debt (mainly mortgage debt) as a share of GDP is one of the highest in the world, but manageable. And our corporate and government debt as a share of GDP are among the lowest, if not actually the lowest. Overall, we are not living too far above our means compared with most other developed nations.

Sydney is the stand-out loner among our capital cities. Its economy and that of NSW are doing well, indeed the best in the nation, but that may not protect it from a dwelling price correction in the year or so ahead, or a longish period of prices flat-lining until incomes catch up to restore equanimity.

 

Phil Ruthven is Founder of IBISWorld and is recognised as one of Australia’s foremost business strategists and futurists. This article is general information and does not consider the needs of any individual.

 

5 Comments
Shimajiro
November 28, 2016

It's a bit concerning that a movement of 2% in interest (2006-2008) lead to an increase of 5% in % of household income, and that current serviceability is almost the same as when interest rates were 16%. Won't it be exciting if interest rates are forced up a bit.

Bruce
October 31, 2016

Despite the hype and optimism of property spruikers hoping for more interest rate cuts to maintain the upward trend, one factor against replicating the same type of housing price growth is the possibility of changes to negative gearing or capital gains tax concessions. Superannuation has already had a haircut and governments looking to raise revenue are likely to change the current policy settings for investment property.

Murray Rothbard
October 26, 2016

The residential price charts start around 1986-1987, when interest rates were still on the way up but approaching their peak. A key factor in the performance of residential land over this period has been the fact that interest rates (and mortgage rates as a result) have been in a sustained downward trend.

All long duration assets have benefited greatly from this trend, especially residential land in capital cities such as Sydney and Melbourne.

I find it almost impossible that the same type of performance can be replicated over the next 30 years with interest rates at their current level.

Kevin
October 22, 2016

I think manageable is the key word.I bought an investment property in 1990 for around 100K.annual income of around 30K,interest rates @ around 19%.

Close to 66% of gross income just to pay the interest on the loan.Thankfully the rent and tax rebates saved me from bankruptcy,but it was very difficult.The bank should not have lent me the money,however that was still my fault,not theirs.

Today I still own that property and it can be bought for around 500K,average income in WA around 80K,interest rates @ 4%.To pay the interest on the loan is 25% of income.We are constantly told that houses are overpriced and nobody can afford to buy, and houses were so cheap years ago.The mind boggles.

Say in 30 yrs time will history repeat and everybody will be saying exactly the same things as today .Nobody can afford to buy a house,houses were so cheap in 2016.

Is it a case of the only lesson that history teaches us is that people refuse to learn the lessons that history teaches us.

Should rent not be looked at as an incalculable amount of debt over the coming 30 yrs.i am old now,all of my life people have kept repeating that nobody can affoed to buy a house,from the 1950,s on time has proved it to be nonsense.

David
October 20, 2016

I'm a bit confused about the debt servicing graph. 5% of household disposable income??

I'm assuming this must be an average figure which has been dragged down by people who purchased property some time ago and have been paying off their loans for a long while. At the other end of the scale there are lots of people with significantly higher debt servicing ratios than that. Banks don't foreclose loans based on average serviceability across their lending portfolio. They monitor each loan individually. A more meaningful statistic might be what percentage of total loans are held by people with very high servicing ratios.

I'm also a bit surprised at the "trend" line. It appears to be based on only 30 years worth of data. Longer data series indicate a much lower trend, and suggest that the last 20 years of property prices are way above trend and overdue for a correction. Either that, or long term trends are no longer relevant because "this time is different", "this market is different", "we are undergoing a paradigm shift" or "this is the new normal".

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Australian house prices close in on world record

What's left unsaid in Australia's housing bubble

Financial pathways to buying a home require planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.