Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 245

Impact on hybrids of Labor’s franking policy

A Labor Party win at the next Federal election may change the dividend imputation system with potentially significant impacts on self-funded retirees. Fears that the abolition of excess franking credit refunds will cause a substantial disruption to the hybrid market are unlikely. However, as with any change there is always potential for winners and losers, and with that comes opportunity.

A long way to go in its current form

There are a number of events required prior to this policy becoming legislated, including:

  • The Labor Party would have to win government at the next Federal election
  • The policy would have to withstand changes to water down its impact
  • The legislation would need to pass in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

There are doubts about all three to varying degrees and the probability of all three occurring appears relatively low. The second and third points are somewhat related. The proposal as currently structured is unlikely to receive support in the Senate. Changes may be required to ensure low-income earners are protected, such as introducing a cap on claims. If the policy is watered down, the proposal may continue to struggle unless the Labor Party has a majority in the Senate.

Likely to lead to a buying opportunity

Even if legislation is enacted as initially communicated, it is unlikely to be a death knell for the hybrid market. While SMSFs and self-funded retirees account for a substantial part of the hybrid market, they aren’t the only investors who can utilise the franking credits. In the retail space, for example, SMSFs in accumulation phase and self-funded retirees with other taxable income will continue to gain the full benefits of fully franked hybrids. The market also includes institutional buyers.

That’s not to say there won’t be some dislocation. There is likely to be a sell-off of hybrids as investors who can’t utilise the franking credits transfer them to those who can. Also, given the pool of potential fully franked hybrid investors will diminish, there may be an increase in margins attached to new hybrids. For those who can use the franking credits, that is good news. The increase in margins, however, is likely to be moderate creating a relatively minor impediment for hybrid issuers rather than a permanent roadblock.

The proposed changes have already impacted the hybrid market, with bank and insurance securities experiencing a sell-off and adding to the widening trend that commenced in February. The following chart from Bell Potter shows that trading margins on the most common major bank hybrids (the black line) have increased from around +275bps to +350bps since early February 2018, a material move. We believe there may be some further weakness in the near term but ultimately this will be seen as a buying opportunity.

Click to enlarge. Source: Bell Potter Fixed Interest Weekly 16 March 2018

Notwithstanding that the impact on the more recent Basel III hybrids is likely to be less than the market is anticipating, our preferred hybrids remain the pre-GFC/legacy perpetual income style securities such as those listed on the ASX under codes NABHA (National Australia Bank) and MBLHB (Macquarie Bank). We believe that there is a high probability that there will be a buy-back and/or redemption of these securities in the next few years with either option resulting is substantial capital gains from current levels.

More detail on NABHA

The National Income Securities (ASX:NABHA) are a legacy Tier 1 hybrid that was issued in 1999. We believe NAB will look to replace the NABHAs with a Basel III compliant hybrid (i.e. Additional Tier 1 security such as the NABPDs) when the NABHA’s become inefficient capital between 2020 and 2022 and that investors will be able to exit at $100.

Based on a current price of $78.55 (at the time of writing), this equates to the following yields to call depending on the timing of the potential exit:

Our base case is that this will likely happen on the first coupon payment date in 2021 (i.e. 15 February 2021 – highlighted in blue) which would equate to yield to call of 12.5% (or a trading margin of +10.3% over swap). Further, NABHAs are set to benefit from any recycling out of traditional hybrids that may be impacted by the ALP’s proposed franking changes given that NABHAs do not have any franking credits attached but rather pay the entire coupon in cash.

We believe that although the documented maturity is ‘perpetual’, NAB will retire the NABHAs before 2022 for three key reasons:

  • Capital/regulatory treatment – these legacy securities will no longer count towards capital ratios from 1 January 2022
  • Replacement cost – NAB can replace the NABHAs with cheaper and/or more capital effective securities
  • Precedent - the recent buybacks of the NAB USD Libor+15bps (i.e. very cheap) legacy Upper Tier 2 capital security.

Of course, much can happen between now and 2022 and investors must make their own enquiries and judgement, and the Labor Party policy has added an element of uncertainty to the outlook for hybrids.

 

Brad Newcombe is a High Yield Analyst, Fixed Income at Mint Partners Australia. Individuals should make investment decisions based on a comprehensive understanding of their own financial position and in consultation with their own financial advisors.

 

  •   21 March 2018
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

What might the Tax White Paper say on imputation and CGT?

Bank reporting season scorecard November 2025

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.