Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

9 July 2025

Home / 172

Insights into LICs trading at a discount

Research company Independent Investment Research (IIR) produces a monthly report on Listed Investment Companies, which Cuffelinks regularly publishes.

In addition to the usual updates on new issues and fund activity, it includes an extensive database on LICs covered in their research.

This week, there is a useful article on LICs trading at a discount to their Net Tangible Assets (NTA) value. This does not necessarily make them a 'buy', as explained by IIR:

"LICs can often trade at a discount for a prolonged period and there is no guarantee that share prices will eventually move towards NTA. Before buying LICs at a discount we need to understand why they are trading at a discount and the likely catalysts to move them closer to NTA."

Here is a sample. Despite some of the LICs being managed by prominent fund managers, for various reasons, some LICs fall out of favour.

For example, the portfolio of a LIC such as Flagship Investments (ASX:FSI) has outperformed its index but it has a long history of trading at a discount, in this case over 20%, partly due to its relatively small size (about $40 million). As IIR writes on FSI:

"Large-cap stocks account for around half the portfolio, with the rest split between mid, small and micro-cap stocks. The portfolio (pre-tax NAV plus dividends) has outperformed the ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index over one, three and five-year periods. Performance has been helped by exposure to the better performing small cap sector of the market. Tracking error is slightly higher than some of the large cap focused LICs but beta is below one. FSI was at a 21.5% discount to pre-tax NTA at 31 July 2016. This looks an attractive entry point, but the shares have historically traded at a large discount. If the company is able to sustain outperformance this may lead to a rerating over time."

There is no slow down in the number of LICs coming to the market, with total funds under management reaching the $30 billion level. Given there is now a choice of over 80 LICs, it's a segment of the market worth understanding.

 

Graham Hand is Editor of Cuffelinks. Disclosure: Graham is on the board of the Listed Investment Company, Absolute Equity Performance Fund Limited (ASX:AEG), and holds an investment in FSI. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.  

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

The fascinating battle between Nick Bolton and Magellan

Why LICs are closing and more should follow

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.