Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 464

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

There are many apt analogies explaining the ways central banks supported financial markets all the way back to the GFC until last year and how that process is reversing. We can choose from removing the punchbowl, hitting the brakes or taking the wind out of the market’s sails, but I’ll go with a reference to one of the best series of all time and say winter is coming (if not already here).

There have not been many safe havens in the traditional asset classes over the last 12 months, but where does that leave us today? Is the worst behind us or is there more to come?

What are credit spreads?

As an unconstrained investment grade bond fund manager, most of the risk in our portfolios is driven by the change in the general level of credit spreads. Credit assets (ie non-government) trade at a margin above the risk-free (government) rate. This margin compensates investors for the increased risk associated with lending to an institution with greater default risk than the government. The difference between government risk pricing and corporate risk pricing is referred to as the credit spread. Generally speaking, the riskier the borrower the wider the spread demanded over the risk-free rate. For example, in the current market five-year A-rated assets are trading around 1.50% above the government bond curve while BBB-rated assets are trading about 2.10% higher (or 0.6% more).

From an investment perspective, when markets get nervous or more pessimistic about the outlook, the credit spread or risk premium demanded tends to increase. This is similar to equity markets selling off to compensate for lower expected earnings or a reduction in the multiple investors are willing to pay for a dollar of earnings.

These wider credit spreads in bond markets push down prices and can result in short-term losses. However, there is a critical difference between a correction in the bond market and those in the equity markets. Bonds are a contractual obligation to pay money back at a certain time at an agreed price. Equities have no such contractual obligation, so when equity markets go down there is no guarantee you will recover those losses. However, any near-term loss in performance of fixed income assets is contractually guaranteed to be recovered as long as the issuer doesn’t default.

The following table provides an example of this. A near-term selloff results in short-term losses but then a higher forward expected return over the life of the bond. This example applies to bond funds as well. For example, the Daintree Core Income Fund has had multiple negative monthly returns due to the credit spread widening. However, if we were to reset the portfolio to normal risk-on positioning today the forward expected return on the fund would be much higher.

In this example, a five-year bond is bought at issue for 100 with a 3% annual coupon. At the end of the first year, rates have risen to 4% and the price has fallen to 96.34. The price loss is 3.64% less the 3% coupon to give an annualised return of -0.64%. But importantly from that point forward, the expected return of the bond is much higher resulting in an attractive entry level. Over the life of the bond, rates and prices change but the bond delivers the expected return (compounded to reflect the semi-annual coupon).

Source: Daintree. Modelled price and returns of a five-year semi-annual coupon bond through its life. Coupons are re-invested at the average of the yield at the start of the period and the yield at the end of the period.

Where are credit spreads likely to peak?

There are lots of academic studies which show that humans are usually terrible at forecasting. We suffer from all sorts of biases and are often overconfident in our conclusions when we have a little bit of knowledge or experience. At Daintree, we remain humble about our ability to forecast. The future is unknowable, but at the same time we must make investment decisions today with imperfect and incomplete information. Therefore, we need to have a view but also allow for a wide margin of error.

Consider the chart below which looks at the average Australian investment grade credit spread going back to 2004:

  1. While spreads have widened over the past 16 months, they are only modestly wider than the average level over this period.
  2. Spreads are still well below the levels reached during the GFC crisis in 2008-2009 and the European sovereign debt crisis in 2011-2012.
  3. Spreads are now just slightly above the levels seen during 2015-2016 commodity weakness as well as the COVID crisis in March 2020.

Source: Bloomberg

So, this begs the question, how much further could they widen? It seems reasonable to conclude that short of a large tail event (such as Russia expanding its aggression into Europe) that spreads are not likely to reach the wide levels seen in the GFC or the European sovereign debt crisis.

Our justification for this view is based in-part on increased financial system resilience and improvements in corporate balance sheets:

  • Despite the fact that monetary accommodation is being reduced, global central banks remain much more supportive of financial stability than during the GFC. Structurally, liquidity in credit markets is significantly better than it was then and banks are much better capitalized
  • Australian corporations in general have done a good job improving their financial position over the last few years. The chart below shows a material improvement in the average amount of net debt of companies in the ASX200 index relative to cashflow (approximated by EBITDA).

Source: Bloomberg

On the flip side, markets have not had to contend with the extraordinary levels of inflation we are now seeing for many decades. There will be pain as central banks begin to remove accommodation and work to reduce inflation. We have been expecting a correction in Australian credit spreads toward a range of 1.75% to 2.25%. The market is currently around the low end of our estimated range, and therefore on balance we believe there could be more spread widening to come but we do feel the vast majority of the repricing has already occurred.

What about interest rates?

Most people in the market have been telling us they have been underweight interest rate duration (that is, not investing in long-term fixed rate bonds) for a long period of time and given the increase in government bond yields, they are now wondering if this a good opportunity to start adding duration back into their portfolios.

There are three things to consider.

First, in a high-inflation environment, historically the correlation between government bonds and equities has tended to be positive, meaning they sell off at the same time. Adding government duration to hedge out modest equity corrections may lead to disappointing results.

Second, adding long duration government bonds purely as a hedge against significant tail events (such a world war) does make sense in our view. Our suggestion would be to find the cheapest long duration government bond index fund for a portion of a diversified portfolio.

However, thirdly, if fixed income is viewed purely as a defensive allocation which earns a modest income and minimises capital volatility, allocating to a fund that mirrors a simple index such as the Ausbond Composite index is sub-optimal. To illustrate why, consider the chart below which shows the shape of the Australian government bond curve.


Source: Bloomberg

By buying longer-dated assets, expected returns are increased but there is no free lunch. These assets come with greater interest rate risk, meaning changes in underlying interest rates result in larger changes in bond prices. We believe a focus on the 1.5-2.0-year part of the curve makes more sense. Investors can pick up about 75-80% of the yield available while only taking on about a third of the interest rate risk embedded in traditional Ausbond Index-type products. Investors should either target shorter-duration funds or choose funds that have flexible mandates to increase interest rate duration in a more optimal way when it makes sense to do so.

In the danger zone?

Where does all this leave us in the current environment? Is it time to load up on risk or sit on the sidelines? We are in the latter camp for now. While risk asset markets have corrected a fair bit, on balance it feels like there is still more to come. Central banks are still early in the process of removing accommodation and even they don’t know how far they are going to have to go. If inflation proves challenging to tame and central banks err on the side of dampening inflation at the expense of growth, there could be a rough period ahead for financial markets.


Mark Mitchell is Managing Director of Daintree Capital. This article does not take into account your investment objectives, particular needs or financial situation and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation.



Global credit valuations: are we there yet?

What does the current yield curve tell us?

Income-seekers: these 'myths' could come back to haunt you


Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 464 with weekend update

The 2021 Census reports that Millennials are now the largest generational group in Australia. While we are increasingly secular and culturally diverse, our differences are far more accepted than the way the US is heading. And please take our short retirement survey.

  • 30 June 2022

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Latest Updates


The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.


Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.


The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.


The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.