Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 155

Do investment principles stand test of time?

Time travel is a skill that would dramatically transform the world of the investor. Sadly, despite all the technological advances of the past two decades, the ability to go back or forward in time remains the realm of science fiction novels, not a killer app on an investor’s smartphone. While time travel may still be the domain of TV and film producers, the passage of time is a real-world test for investment ideas even if - as we are constantly reminded - history is not a great predictor of future returns.

What has changed over 20 years?

Twenty years ago, Australia was a country of 18 million people with a median age of 37 and the median weekly household income was $637 while the cash rate was set at 7.5%. The fledgling superannuation system had accumulated assets of $262 billion some four years after the super guarantee contribution had been introduced.

In 1996 a new, more modest undertaking was getting started - it was the year Vanguard established its Australian business which was its first outside the US. It seems an appropriate time to look back and see how the underlying investment principles that Vanguard has used in guidance to clients has stood up to the test of two decades.

The market has changed markedly. Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation on the Australian share market in 1996, half have either dropped out of the top 10 or are no longer on the ASX.

With help from actuarial firm Rice Warner, we decided to look at the past 20 years through the time capsule of three different investors in 1996 – a 40-year-old, a 20-year-old and a newborn baby – and test how our investment principles have stood up to 20 years of significant geo-political shocks, stunning market rises and dramatic declines that included a global financial crisis.

All our investment strategies are underpinned by four core principles:

  • Goals: Create clear and appropriate investment goals
  • Balance: Develop a suitable asset allocation using broadly diversified funds
  • Cost: Use low-cost, transparent investment options
  • Discipline: Keep perspective and long-term discipline

Outcomes for our three investors over two decades

One of the first lessons is that investors have been rewarded for taking extra risk.

An investor who invested $10,000 at the start of 1996 in cash would have seen the nominal value grow to $26,800. Someone who had invested in the Australian sharemarket index would have seen the portfolio value grow to $51,400. The US sharemarket index was just slightly behind at $48,100 while Australian bonds grew to $37,600.

For our three investors, Rice Warner was asked to model the superannuation outcomes. Remember back in 1996, super was really just getting started, so our 40-year-old did not get the benefit of a full career under the super guarantee nor the higher rate we have today.

The growth in the super system has clearly been one of the major developments in the Australian financial landscape in the past 20 years with it now being the second largest financial asset in average Australian households and the system growing into a savings pool of more than $2 trillion.

Our 40-year-old in 1996 is now turning 60 in 2016 and with retirement firmly in sight, Rice Warner project their super balance at retirement (assuming compulsory Superannuation Guarantee only contributions, average wages and a 7.5% gross return on investments) to be $217,000 in today’s dollars. That is projected to last until they are 74-years-old.

For the person turning 20 in 1996, and effectively just starting out in their working life, who is now 40 in 2016, the projected retirement balance is $395,000 when they reach retirement age. This money is expected to last until they are 83-years-old.

For the baby in our investor trio who is now 20, the projected super account balance accumulated during their working life is $456,000 – more than double what the 40-year-old is likely to get. It should last until they are 87.

Source: Rice Warner. Assumes default super with no additional concessional contributions.

Based on the ASFA comfortable retirement standard, the baby of 1996 could reasonably expect her super to last 13 years longer than their older baby boomer counterpart.

Higher contribution rates and a long-time period to allow compounding to work is driving these outcomes but it is interesting to reflect that even after more than 20 years, our super system is not yet at maturity. The challenge remains for those in the older age bracket to be able to contribute enough to fund their retirement lifestyle.


Robin Bowerman is Principal, Market Strategy and Communications at Vanguard Australia. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.



Garry Weaven on 5 areas of super investment


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?


Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.


Why short-termism is both a travesty and an opportunity

On any given day, whether the stockmarket rises or falls is a coin toss, but stay invested for 10 years and the odds are excellent. It's at times of market selloffs that opportunities present for long-term investors.

Investment strategies

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

No excuses: Plan now for recession

The signs of a coming recession are building, especially in the US. In personal and business decisions, it's time to be more conservative and engage in risk management until some of the uncertainty is resolved. 


The fall of Volt Bank removes another bank competitor

The startup banks were supposed to challenge the lazy, oligopolistic major banks, but 86 400, Xinja and now Volt have gone. Why did Volt disappear so quickly when it had gained deposit support and name recognition?


Three main challenges to online ads and ‘surveillance capitalism’

Surveillance capitalism refers to the collection and use of consumer data to further profits. Will a renewed focus on privacy change the online-ad business model, or is it too entrenched?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.