Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 247

Labor's new franking policy is unfair to LICs

The Labor Party needs to articulate how it will treat shareholders in Listed Investment Companies (LICs) fairly under their proposal to deny refunds for excess franking credits.

The current system of taxation of dividends ensures that Australian resident shareholders are taxed at their applicable rate of income tax on dividends received from companies, rather than a minimum of the company tax rate. Denying refunds for excess franking credits will require complex changes to legislation to maintain the existing policy of allowing shareholders in LICs to effectively receive the CGT discount on capital gains earned by the LIC.

When a LIC earns a capital gain it pays income tax on the capital gain at the corporate tax rate, typically 30%. When it pays the capital gain to the shareholder as a LIC dividend, the shareholder is taxed on the dividend and franking credit in the usual way, but also receives a tax deduction that represents the CGT discount the shareholder would receive if they derived the gain directly or received it from a trust.

Below is the analysis showing the calculations for an investor (super fund or High Net Wealth Individual) investing in a LIC or either directly in shares or via a trust.

Calculation of tax payable on a $10,000 capital gain by:

  • Super fund in accumulation phase invested in an LIC (Super-LIC)
  • Super fund in accumulation phase invested in a trust or direct shares (Super-Trust)
  • High net worth individual (HNWI-Trust)

Currently, they receive a refund of the excess tax paid by the LIC above their tax rate after the tax deduction for the CGT discount. Denying the refund of excess franking credits results in the shareholder paying 30% tax on the dividend. This is a 27% higher rate of tax on a capital gain than is paid by someone on the top marginal rate of tax. This means a super fund will pay at least three times that rate of tax on a capital gain distributed by a LIC when compared to a capital gain it earns itself or via a trust and 27% more tax than an individual on the highest rate of tax.

(That is, a HNWI pays $2,350 on a $10,000 capital gain. A super fund in accumulation phase pays $3,000 on a capital gain earned by a LIC. The difference is $650 divided by the tax paid by the HNWI of $2,350 gives 27% more tax payable by the super fund).

Given that a large percentage of investors in LICs are super funds and that many investors in LICs are not wealthy, this is an inequitable result that will need to be addressed.


Howard Badger is a Partner in Tax Consulting at Pitcher Partners. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

Michael Newman
April 13, 2018

So why did Costello change it from Keating's original purpose and at what cost to revenue since and how did it work before the changes?

Daryl Wilson (Affluence Funds)
April 09, 2018

Listed Investment Trusts such as recent IPO Magellan Global Trust (MGG) are a much better structure than an LIC. A LIT pays no tax, just passes on any taxable income (plus any franking credits received) to the end investor in the same way as an unlisted managed fund.

This is a much more efficient system and avoids the situation described above. In addition, it means any discounted capital gains can also be passed directly through - in our experience very few LICs actually state the capital gain portion of dividends and thus investors get very little advantage from the tax deduction.

Don McLennan
April 09, 2018

Shorten's original plan was to only allow Franking Credits to used to pay tax.
Bill quickly changed so now SMSF in the pension phase are about the only sector to be hit by
this measure.
Most members of a SMSF in the pension phase with a balance below $1.6m could lose their "credits". In my case i will lose 20% of my income. In fact i would be better off paying the 15% tax which those in the accumulation phase
Most high wealth individuals that Labor aims to target probably have over $3m in "super".
As an adviser i would advise them to reduce their holdings of companies paying fully franked dividends in their $1.6 section Holding these in their section paying 15% tax
Many will be able to use all their franking credits in this section
So it seems that some of the middle class who have saved hard & are now self funded retirees will be the group mostly hit.

D Ramsay
April 12, 2018

Well said.
Additionally why doesn't the Labour party be honest and only go after the ones they really want - namely the folks in SMSF's that have >$1.6M in super and put in a means test that exempts those that are below the above threshold from losing their franking credits.
I believe the figures are such that 97% of folks receiving franking credits are on annual taxable incomes of <$87K.
Labour discourages people from being self funded in retirement.

April 06, 2018

Another unintended consequence for the new policy to fix.


Leave a Comment:



LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Conflicted selling fees are back, and it’s game on

Four ways to invest in the same fund and save money


Most viewed in recent weeks

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 467

Fund manager reports for last financial year are drifting into client mailboxes, and many of the results are disappointing. With some funds giving back their 2021 gains, why did they not reduce their exposure to hot stocks when faced with rising inflation and rates?

  • 21 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 466 with weekend update

Heard the word, cakeism? As in, 'having your cake and eating it too'. The Reserve Bank wants to simultaneously fight inflation by taking away spending power, while not driving the economy into a recession. If you want to help, stop buying stuff.

  • 14 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 465 with weekend update

Many thanks for the thousands of revealing comments in our survey on retirement experiences. We discuss the full results. And with the ASX200 down 10%, the US S&P500 off 20% and bond prices tanking, each investor faces the new financial year deciding whether to sit, sell or invest more.

  • 7 July 2022

Latest Updates


The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.


Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.


The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.


The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.