Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 534

The RBA’s QE losses

Accounting losses from a pandemic inspired bond buying spree has wiped out the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) equity and more, pushing its balance sheet into negative equity territory.

Its 2022/23 annual report shows a loss of $6 billon for the financial year, which following the $36.7 billion loss in the previous year, now has the bank’s liabilities $17.7 billion in excess of its assets (see chart). But being a government entity that can create money to pay its bills, it remains secure.

How it happened

How did the RBA get into this predicament? To understand why the RBA is losing money, we need to follow the flow of money building up to the losses.

When the pandemic exploded in early 2020, the federal government commenced fiscal support packages such as JobKeeper, raising government debt significantly. At the same time, the RBA introduced unprecedented monetary stimulus including ultra-low interest rates and increased commercial bank reserves via quantitative easing (QE).

When the federal government raises debt, it is a loan to the government from the private sector via commercial banks. The banks transfer deposits to Treasury, and a matching liability of government debt arises. That debt is recorded as an asset for the banks, offset by the loaned funds it transferred to Treasury. Treasury pays interest on the government debt to the banks. The resulting balance sheet movements are depicted:

When QE occurs, it is mostly seen as money creation. But it could also be construed as a loan, this time from the private sector to the RBA. Being the “borrower", the RBA gains an asset and a liability, in the form of government debt and commercial bank deposits respectively. The deposits having been created electronically by the RBA, which only central banks can do. The RBA pays interest on those deposits to the banks. Again, the balance sheet movements:

When QE and government debt raising occurs simultaneously, the commercial banks' balance sheets net out, leaving:

If Treasury then transfers its deposits to the private sector to fund say a JobKeeper scheme, then the RBA will have effectively financed that fiscal spending via electronically created deposits. That financing will remain in place until such time that the RBA pays back the government debt it “borrowed” from the banks, and its self-created liabilities are extinguished.

The impact of interest rate rises

The illustrative RBA balance sheet built above reveals a double whammy when interest rates rise. On the assets side, the value of the debt it holds falls with rising interest rates. And on the liabilities side, higher interest rates translate into higher servicing costs on the commercial bank deposits created in the QE process.

With the RBA purchasing some $330 billion worth of government bonds during the QE program at a coupon of around just 0.25%, a rapid rise to 4.1% in the official cash rate has wreaked havoc on the mark-to-market value of its portfolio. And what began as a cost of just 0.1% on the increased bank deposits, has blown out substantially with 4.1% now being paid.

With less than ten per cent of its bonds holdings having matured thus far, the RBA at this stage does not plan to actively sell bonds to wind down its portfolio faster, which would realise capital losses. All the while recognising the risk of further losses if interest rates continue to rise.

This situation is not confined to Australia, with central banks in other advanced economies suffering extensive losses with their QE programs.

The lessons

The question might therefore be asked, did central banks go into the QE caper with eyes wide shut, given the poor financial outcomes of high inflation, rapidly increasing interest rates, and impaired central bank balance sheets?

Many would say that losses should have been expected when buying low-yielding bonds, and when interest rates can really go only one way, up. And that it was not such a good idea after all. While others would say that the stimulus kept businesses afloat, unemployment low, and that it was all for the greater economic good.

In the fullness of time, governments will need to balance whether significant monetary stimulus is appropriate in times of global turmoil, being mindful that there really is no such thing as a free lunch.

 

Tony Dillon is a freelance writer and former actuary. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

This 'forgotten' inflation indicator signals better times ahead

This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Former RBA Governor on why interest rates won't come down soon

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.