Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 599

Read this before you go all in on US equities

US equities rule global markets, but history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible — until they weren’t.

Forecasting market returns is a fool’s errand, as history has repeatedly shown. Few predicted the 2023 AI-fuelled US tech rally after a bruising 2022, or the sharp bond selloff caused by stubborn inflation. There’s only one certainty: markets remain unpredictable. It’s a feature, not a bug.

For the past decade, US equities have been the undisputed stars, delivering an extraordinary run. The S&P 500, powered by the FAANG/Magnificent Seven stocks1, has vastly outperformed the majority of its global peers, giving rise to the US exceptionalism narrative.

But no market dominates forever. Japan ruled the 1980s, emerging markets were the darlings of the 2000s, and even Europe has had its moments in the sun. The US, while formidable, is not immune to weak performance.

This raises a critical question for investors: should you go 'all in' on US equities, riding the momentum of their recent strength, or should you consider a more diversified approach? After all, the smart money forecasts risks, not returns.

Diversification isn’t always as it seems

The conventional response is to allocate to global equities, such as the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI), which spreads exposure across regions but remains heavily skewed towards US equities. That means a downturn in the US — whether sparked by rising interest rates, US President Donald Trump’s policies, Chinese AI developments, or any other unknown — can still leave your portfolio vulnerable.

Shifting the focus from returns to risk and constructing a portfolio that allocates based on diversification and risk balancing can produce a more robust solution. As Figure 1 shows, the ACWI concentrates heavily in US equities, while a risk-based approach allocates more evenly across regions such as Europe, Japan, and emerging markets. This ensures portfolios are better diversified and less tethered to the fortunes of one economy.

Figure 1. A balanced approach to global diversification

Source: MSCI, Man Group, as at January 2025.

While the S&P 500 has delivered strong returns over the past two decades, a risk-based allocation has delivered better risk-adjusted returns. As Figure 2 shows, a risk-based allocation outperforms both the S&P 500 and the MSCI ACWI Index in terms of Sharpe ratio (i.e., investors are better compensated for every unit of risk they take on). Crucially, this approach doesn’t require a crystal ball. It is not about predicting the next big winner but about creating a portfolio that is designed to navigate diverse market conditions without sacrificing upside potential.

Figure 2. Better risk-adjusted returns

Source: Bloomberg, Man Group, as at January 2025.

In equity investing, while risk-adjusted metrics like the Sharpe ratio are valuable, they rarely satisfy investors on their own. In risk-on environments, the focus inevitably shifts to delivering absolute returns — because, as the old adage goes, ‘you can’t eat Sharpe ratio.’

As Figure 3 highlights, a risk-based allocation strategy not only outpaced the MSCI ACWI but also kept pace with the S&P 500, doing so at a lower volatility — a compelling proposition for investors.

Figure 3. A smoother ride – the returns of a risk-based approach compared with the MSCI ACWI and the S&P 500

Source: Bloomberg, Man Group, as at January 2025.

The allure of US equities is understandable. They have been the stars of the investment world for years, and their track record is hard to ignore. But history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible—until they weren’t.

So, before you go 'all in' on the US juggernaut, consider whether there’s a better way to diversify. Because in investing, as in life, betting everything on one idea is rarely the safest path.

 

All data Bloomberg unless otherwise stated.
1. FAANG was the original group of tech superstar stocks Facebook (now Meta Platforms, Inc.), Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google (now Alphabet, Inc.), that morphed into the Magnificent Seven, dropping Netflix, and adding Nvidia, Tesla and Microsoft.

 

Contributors: Tarek Abou Zeid, Partner, Client Portfolio Manager, Man AHL, Peter Weidner, Head of Total Return Strategies, Man AHL, Max Buchanan, Client Portfolio Management Analyst, Man AHL and Katerina Koutsouri, a quantitative analyst at Man AHL. Man Group is a fund manager partner of GSFM, a Firstlinks sponsor. The information included in this article is provided for informational purposes only.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Investing across deflation, inflation and stagflation

Sin stocks, divestment and the right to choose

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.