Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 225

How state charges can kill investment returns

One of the reasons investment property is popular is that many people do not realise the full extent of the costs. They often fall in love with a place without checking all the expenses, and estate agents quote gross returns and go unchallenged. While investors may be familiar with (often understated) strata and council fees, the state government charges such as stamp duty, land tax and car space levies can come as a shock.

Even the Defence Housing Authority, a statutory authority and a major Government Business Enterprise (GBE), responsible for providing housing to defence members by selling property and leasing it back, quotes gross yields, as in the example below. Net yield before borrowing cost may be only 1%, as we’ll show later.

We have previously discussed the many costs in property (for example, here and here), and we will not repeat those points, except to note that NSW stamp duty on a $1,080,000 house would be a chunky $45,000.

This article focusses more on two other state charges which are often overlooked by investors.

Parking space levy

The property pages in our newspapers love a good car park story. It might be only 14 square meters of concrete, but it can cost over $200,000. They rarely mention the car space attracts council levies and strata fees, although there will never be a garbage collection. At least there are no water rates. A check of real estate pages reveals these gems:

$222,000 Undercover security carspace in Potts Point

“Very tightly held, this carspace is situated in 'The Chimes', a secure building accessed via McDonald Street, just off Macleay Street on the northern end of vibrant Potts Point. This space is of special interest to local businesses, local new development investors and owner occupiers wanting a car spot in Potts Point.”

$190,000 Rare separate title car space in security building

“Situated in 'St Killian' a secure building which is conveniently located between Victoria Street and Macleay Street. This is an ideal opportunity to add a car space to your apartment or business.”

These high prices are usually paid by people who want to park near their home. But in many parts (see map here) of the City of Sydney, North Sydney, Milsons Point (Category 1) and Bondi Junction, Chatswood, Parramatta and St Leonards (Category 2), investors face a parking space levy. It creates a two-tier market as owner occupiers are exempt from the levy if they live adjacent to the space. It’s the same in some other states.

Before you think a slab of concrete sounds like a solid investment, let’s look at a specific example away from the glitz of Potts Point.

In 2004, the development of an old wool store at 360 Harris Street, Pyrmont included 425 parking spaces, with prices starting at $56,000 per space. The marketing said it was “the best investment you’ll ever make”, “amazingly affordable” and “unbelievably scarce”. Two of our main newspapers helped with the marketing. A Sydney Morning Herald article (‘On the lookout’, Domain, 1 July 2004) reported hundreds of calls and that over 200 sold before public launch:

“At prices of $56,000 to $70,000 per space with long leases in place, this unique opportunity should be rushed by investors.”

The Australian Financial Review article (‘Good places to park money for useful returns’, 17 June 2004) generously quoted the agent saying:

“When something has a $56,000 starting price, it is not hard to imagine it doubling over time.”

At the time, for any investor who cared to check, the parking space levy was $840 a year. A crystal ball might have shown billions of dollars spent a decade later in the adjacent Darling Harbour and the coming boom in property prices. Secure Parking offered long-term leases. What could go wrong?

The investment yielding … nothing but a capital loss

The state government needed money, disguised as “to discourage car use in leviable districts while attracting customers to public transport”. From 1 July 2009, the levy doubled to $2,000, and it has since risen to $2,390.

In 2017, Secure Parking will pay gross rent for a car space at 360 Harris Street of about $4,000 a year (it was $3,600 in 2004). The investor pays $2,390 in parking space levy (reduced somewhat by the occupancy rate of the parking station), $680 in council rates and over $1,000 a year in strata fees. That leaves … not enough to pay the accountant to prepare the tax return.

And the value now of the car spaces that cost at least $56,000 in 2004? If you like the idea of buying a piece of Sydney real estate, right next to the new International Convention Centre and the CBD, it can be yours for only $35,000. Here’s the advertisement in Domain (at least three to choose from, and I have no vested interest in any of them). Just like 13 years ago, it’s amazingly affordable.

This development was clearly targeted at investors, and the increase in parking space levy was a material factor in destroying the value of these car spaces.

Land tax

Thousands of people own investment property, but how many realise that the next time they buy another, the land tax could remove almost half the estimated net return?

In New South Wales (and there are equivalents in other states), the land tax is currently charged at:

The tax is paid on the combined value of all the taxable land owned above the threshold. Let’s assume an investor already owns one property with a land value of $549,000, and buys the Kellyville house with a land value of $600,000. The annual land tax for the new property would be $9,000 a year.

Liability for land tax includes:

  • Vacant land even if it is generating no income, and holiday homes
  • Commercial and industrial property, including (wait for it …) car spaces
  • Payable by the owner whether an individual, company, trust or trustee of a super fund.

The principal place of residence in excluded when the property is owned by a ‘natural person’. This exemption is not affected by the size or value of the land, which is why some cash poor pensioners can sit on a $10 million harbour mansion, draw a full pension and not pay land tax.

Let’s do some quick calculations on the Kellyville investment:

Cost of house: $1,130,000 including stamp duty $45,000 plus legals and inspections, say $5,000

Gross rent: $675 a week for 52 weeks (DHA guarantees no vacancy) $35,100

Annual costs (ignoring mortgage): Water $1,144, Council $1,285, DHA service fee $5,800, Repairs say $5,000 a year. Total costs $13,229 (the DHA fee includes some 'make good' action at the end of the lease).

Net return before land tax: $35,100-$13,229= $21,871 on $1,130,000 = 1.9%.

In this example, the land tax of $9,000 then takes over 40% of the net return. Final net: 1.1%.

The investor is probably borrowing and enjoying the tax benefits of making a loss, but that’s another story.

Go in with eyes wide open

Any time you buy property, open a spreadsheet and add all the initial expenses to the purchase price. When calculating income, assume one month a year of vacancy. Subtract every cost including agent fees, and allow for increases. In a new apartment, strata fees always rise as soon as the new strata committee sees the maintenance bills. Add the state levies.

Investment loans have become more expensive lately. Make sure you have other sources of income than rent because for most investment properties in Sydney and Melbourne, the net income will not cover the mortgage. You’d better hope the capital gain kicks in … and the government does not think up another tax.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks.

RELATED ARTICLES

Tax reform favours apartments and owner-occupiers

Labor policies and the impact on housing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.