Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 256

Why stock selection beats macro forecasting

People tend to observe the world through a deterministic lens, with outcomes determined to be a consequence of a series of logical and ‘inevitable’ steps. In reality, the path of history is chaotic, with outcomes hugely sensitive to small changes in, and interactions between, thousands of variables. Future uncertainty and the fact that infinitely more things can happen than will happen, is the nature of investment risk.

Macro trends versus stock picking

Some investors spend a great deal of time trying to predict macro trends. Where will the S&P 500 be at the end of 2018? Will the Fed raise rates three or four times? Will ‘FAANG’ (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google) or ‘MCBM’ (McDonald’s, Caterpillar, Boeing and 3M, apparently pronounced ‘macbim’) continue to outpace the market? But the chaotic nature of investment renders predictions unproductive at best and harmful to your long-term financial health at worst.

Rather than forecasting macro trends, a better approach is to estimate what a business is worth via an assessment of the likely range of outcomes for growth and cash flow over the very long term for that business. If we can find instances where we believe a share price embeds a significantly less optimistic outlook for the fundamentals of the company than our estimate, then we will buy the shares. If we are successful, we create a selection of investments that have a range of outcomes that are superior to that of the average stock. An estimate of future returns might look like the chart below.

We cannot know the outcomes for any share in advance, but the estimated distribution is based on real data and should be a reasonable approximation. Such a chart shows the degree to which ‘uncertainty’ or ‘risk’ will likely dictate the outcome for any single investment. The high ‘noise to signal’ ratio highlights the importance of careful position-size management as well as identifying a number of uncorrelated mispricings in order to diversify risk.

It also illustrates why ‘lumpy’ fund returns are almost mathematically certain, irrespective of how much skill you have in identifying undervalued stocks. It is also extremely rare to find manager ‘hit rates’ (the ex-post ratio of winners to losers in a portfolio) that exceed 50% by any meaningful degree. Too many ex-ante ‘good decisions’ will end up as ex-post losers, purely by chance.

The share selection approach is especially apt today, an environment in which we find attractive opportunities in the less predictable areas of the market.

One illustration: XPO

XPO Logistics, currently the largest holding in Orbis Global, is a good illustration. It has been the biggest contributor to Orbis Global’s performance over the past 12 months and is among its top ten contributors since inception in 1990. Today, at $102 per share, XPO’s price has more than quadrupled since our initial purchase in 2013.

But it was hardly an obvious opportunity at the time. The company had negative tangible book value, negative earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA), negative cash from operations, and negative free cash flow (FCF). We developed a deep conviction in management’s ability to create significant long-term value for shareholders through the company’s aggressive acquisition strategy in the transportation and logistics industry.

Many of our analysts vocally challenged the thesis and argued that we should sell the position. A firm with a consensus-based system would probably not have owned XPO. Similarly, those with more dogmatic approaches to valuation or style would likely have avoided the stock. And it would have been hard for many to stick with the position during the uncomfortable period when it wasn’t adding value in the short term. As the chart below shows, performance doesn’t come in a straight line and that’s why a long-term perspective is so critical. Fortunately, we empower stock pickers to express unpopular views and to stick with them in the moments of greatest opportunity.

Through strategic vision, savvy capital allocation, and strong execution, management has built XPO into a global logistics leader with highly differentiated technology and capabilities in the area of contract logistics. In particular, the opportunity to provide logistics services to e-commerce customers, which are a source for nearly a third of XPO’s revenue, is driving approximately 10% per annum organic revenue growth for XPO. This is likely to fuel mid-teens growth in EBITDA and 20-30% growth in FCF.

Even this enthusiastic outlook for XPO’s prospects does not give any credit for management’s ability to create incremental value through additional acquisitions, something management is actively pursuing. With an exceptional track record, there is significant potential to build on its tiny 1.5% share of the trillion-dollar global logistics market.

Selection diversity

Assessing that the range of outcomes are favourably skewed far from guarantees a pleasing realised return. Nobody can forecast accurately what will unfold in the coming years. The long-term value XPO is able to unlock from its acquisition and e-commerce strategies over the next decade will be sensitive to a number of unpredictable variables.

Volatile outcomes are a natural and inevitable consequence of active investing. Investors need to look through shorter-term gyrations and focus on the long term with a spread of stock selection.

 

Graeme Forster is Portfolio Manager at Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This report constitutes general advice only and not personal financial or investment advice. It does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of any particular person. It reflects Orbis’ views at 31 March 2018 and Orbis may have bought or sold any of the investments referred to.

RELATED ARTICLES

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

The flaw in 'value' index funds

Should you be a value or growth investor?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.

Retirement

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.