Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 198

Why 'total superannuation balance' is important for SMSFs

'Total superannuation balance' is a term all superannuation fund members should understand, especially those people with large balances. It will impact how much a person can contribute into their SMSF, whether they qualify for certain superannuation entitlements, and which method their fund can use to determine tax-exempt income from 1 July 2017.

A member’s total superannuation balance is calculated by adding together their accumulation account balance, retirement pension account balance, and any money rolled into their SMSF that has not been allocated to either their accumulation or retirement accounts, and then subtracting any structured settlement contributions received in their SMSF.

Many articles have been written on the $1.6 million transfer balance cap. This is the total amount an SMSF member can have in their retirement pension account from 1 July 2017. However, a member’s total superannuation balance is equally important, for the following reasons:

  • Non-concessional contributions: a member’s total superannuation balance must be below the general transfer balance cap ($1.6 million for 2017/2018) in order to make non-concessional contributions into their SMSF from 1 July 2017. The balance is measured at 30 June of the previous year in which the contribution is made and is tested each financial year. This means a member under the age of 65 will not be able to use any unused portion of their bring-forward non-concessional cap if their total balance is $1.6 million or over. As the limit is tied and indexed to the general transfer balance cap, it will increase over time.
  • Spouse contribution tax offset: A spouse can claim a tax offset of up to $540 for making up to $3,000 in non-concessional contributions for their low-income spouse. This is provided the low-income spouse’s total superannuation balance does not exceed the general transfer balance cap of $1.6 million and their total non-concessional contributions received in the relevant financial year do not exceed the $100,000 annual limit. The low-income spouse must also be under the age of 70 and meet the part-time work test (i.e. 40 hours over 30 consecutive days) if aged 65 to 69, both the contributing spouse and the low-income spouse must be Australian residents for income tax purposes and not be living apart on a permanent basis at the time the contribution is made. The income threshold for the low-income spouse must not exceed $40,000 from 1 July 2017.
  • Catch-up concessional contributions: The new law allows any unused concessional contributions (the annual cap will be $25,000) from 1 July 2018 to be carried forward for up to five consecutive years. This is provided the member’s total superannuation balance is less than $500,000. Only unused amounts accrued after 1 July 2018 will be eligible. Amounts carried forward that have not been used after five years will expire. It is important that members maintain accurate records of contributions made into their SMSF.
  • Superannuation co-contributions: In order to be eligible for up to $500 of the Government’s superannuation co-contribution, from 1 July 2017 a member’s total superannuation balance must be less than the transfer balance cap on 30 June of the year before the relevant financial year. The member must also not have contributed more than the $100,000 non-concessional contributions cap, their total income must be below the higher income threshold (i.e. $51,021 for 2016/2017), and 10% of their total income must be from employment related activities, carrying on a business or a combination of both.
  • Segregated assets method: From 1 July 2017, SMSFs will no longer be permitted to apply the segregated assets method to determine their tax-exempt income if any member has more than a $1.6 million superannuation balance and the member is in pension phase.

SMSF members must understand how their entitlements will be affected under the new ‘total superannuation balance’ concept to not only avoid penalties but to also take advantage of opportunities to accumulate more for their retirement savings.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist and author of 'The Self Managed Super Handbook – Superannuation Law for SMSFs in Plain English', see www.monicarule.com.au

4 Comments
ron f
May 07, 2017

If you can use the segregated method to calculate (add-up) your ECPI when total super is less than $1.6m - then why does the same method suddenly become incorrect over $1.6m? Claiming the unsegregated method must be then used and an approximation of ECPI using an actuary's certificate will certainly mean some will pay tax on pension income. This is because the actuarial calculation is full of assumptions, approximations and averages. Unless one does the segregated calculation first then you will never know just how much more (or even less) tax you could be paying. Just try obtaining an actuary certificate and see what i mean.

Brewster
April 25, 2017

The article you refer to says, in the second last paragraph: "Also, if a person’s total balances in all superannuation funds exceeds $1.6 million, it is not possible to make more non-concessional contributions." I can't see how it leads you to believe otherwise.

stefy
April 21, 2017

I am confused about non-concessional contributions after 1/7/2017? I am over 65, have $1.9mil in a combined SMSF and CSS pension. I understand what I have to do to conform to the transfer balance cap. Can I then make a non-concessional contribution next financial year to my new accumulation fund? The previous article "five urban myths about super changes" lead me to believe I could, this article seems to be saying I cant. Of course I understand I will have to pass the work test first.

Anton
April 20, 2017

Useful article. Thanks.
And the treasurer and deputy treasurer said their changes would only affect 4% of superannuants.
Their changes hit the government at the ballot box and when people realise the total impact of these changes and the complexity after July 2017 I think it will hit them at the next election whcih could be some time late 2018.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Do new rules create incentive for single member SMSFs?

How to prevent excessive superannuation balances

Meg on SMSFs: Timing and the new super tax

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.