Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 190

Trust alternatives after 1 July super changes

Given the impending superannuation changes, it's worth taking a fresh look at estate and superannuation succession planning arrangements.


From 1 July 2017, individuals will be able to have a maximum of $1.6 million in the tax-free pension stage of superannuation. Amounts surplus to the $1.6 million need to either be rolled back to the accumulation stage of superannuation (tax rate of 15% applies to income and 10% to capital gains) or withdrawn from superannuation where earnings may be taxed at personal marginal tax rates.

To illustrate the changes and new opportunities, consider the following example:

  • High net worth retired couple, Simon and Danielle, both age 65 with an SMSF total balance of $3.5 million ($1.6 million for Simon and $1.9 million for Danielle). The SMSF is entirely in pension phase so no tax applies.
  • Simon also has an investment portfolio valued at $2 million outside super.
  • Simon passes away in June 2017.
  • They have two minors as grandchildren who do not have any other income.
  • SMSF succession arrangements are such that Danielle can take Simon’s balance as a reversionary pension, lump-sum payment directed to the estate or Danielle, or a combination of the above (the precise mechanics of this will be discussed in another article).
  • For simplicity, assume an earnings rate of 5% (all income, no franking credits) on investments regardless of entity holding assets.

Pre-1 July 2017 consequences

a) Before Simon’s death

In a pre-1 July 2017 world, there is no tax on earnings within the SMSF as it is all in pension stage. Simon pays tax at his marginal rate on his $2 million personal investment portfolio.

b) After Simon’s death

Danielle continues Simon’s pension as reversionary and inherits the $2 million personal portfolio directly. The tax position is the same as when Simon was alive.

Post-1 July 2017 consequences after Simon’s death

Option 1 - Super roll back

Danielle can hold a maximum of $1.6 million in the pension phase. In this example, we assume that the balance above this amount is rolled back to the accumulation stage. Danielle inherits the $2 million share portfolio and pays tax at her marginal rate.

Option 2 - Withdraw excess from superannuation

As a superannuation tax dependant, Danielle is paid a tax-free lump sum death benefit of $1.6 million of Simon’s benefit, withdraws $300,000 of her benefit, and retains a total of $1.6 million in pension stage. The funds withdrawn from the SMSF are invested in Danielle’s name alongside the inherited $2 million portfolio and taxed at her marginal rate.

Option 3 - Super roll-back and share portfolio directed to a testamentary trust

[Note: A testamentary trust is a trust which arises upon the death of the testator, and which is specified in his or her will].

This strategy is a combination of the above two with a twist!

  • $1.6 million stays in pension stage
  • The excess over $1.6 million in the SMSF is rolled back to accumulation stage
  • The $2 million investment portfolio is directed to a testamentary trust with flexibility to distribute income to Danielle and potentially two minor grandchildren who have no other income.


In a pre-1 July 2017 world, it was often best to continue a reversionary pension to the surviving spouse given that all earnings would continue to be 100% tax-free. In these circumstances, testamentary trusts may have had limited appeal.

However, from 1 July 2017, given that high superannuation balances will be excluded from the zero-tax pension environment, an individual’s overall tax position may be optimised by using testamentary trusts for estate assets. This, when combined with careful superannuation succession planning, can lead to significantly better outcomes.


Reuben Zelwer is the Principal of Adapt Wealth Management Pty Ltd. Reuben is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® practitioner and an SMSF Specialist Advisor™. This article is for education purposes and does not consider the circumstances of any person, and is based on an understanding of the legislation at the time of writing.

Andrew Ledingham
February 18, 2017

Great strategy!

Rahul Singh
February 18, 2017

Nice article Reuben and some nice strategical considerations.

With the removal of the less than 10% test, further strategy considerations can be entertained if Danielle is aged somewhere between 65-75 and meets the work test to enable superannuation contributions.

If she meets the work rest, this enables a deductible contribution of up to $25,000 (or whatever the concessional contribution cap is at the time) thus providing an opportunity to save tax on taxable income. Bearing in mind, SG, if she receives any, eats into her concessional contributions cap.

Of course if she is under 65, then no work test required.

Reuben Zelwer
February 17, 2017

Peter, we are not rolling back Simon's pension account to superannuation. Simon's $1.6mn is continuing as a reversionary pension to Danielle. Danielle (Survivor) is the one who is able to rollover her pension balance ($1.9 million) back to accumulation stage - or withdraw it. In hindsight, I should have made this clearer

peter matters
February 17, 2017

Now I am confused. I read that the deceased spouse pension account could not be rolled back to the surviving spouse accumulation account, and had to be paid out of the super fund. This was the reason I started looking at a testamentary trust.

Reuben Zelwer
February 17, 2017

Yes Randall. I'm not necessarily a big fan of BDBNs unless the situation specifically warrants it. I think maximum flexibility in the new super world is best.

February 17, 2017

Thanks for the response Reuben. So here perhaps a good solution with your twist is for Simon to have 4 young grandkids who each draw down via the trust $20,542 each year which would ensure the tax free status for a few more years yet. More seriously, the changes do mean that couples each with more than $1.6m in super have to review their BDNs and wills if they want to minimise taxes and/or also use avenues such as Testamentary trusts for the benefit of any grandkids.

February 16, 2017

Interesting article - as both Simon & Danielle would qualify for the Seniors & Pensioners Tax Offset (SAPTO) I would expect their personal tax liability to be significantly less than that shown in the article.

February 16, 2017

Thanks for a good article Ruben on something I have been pondering over quite a bit. One question please which is what is basis that Simon's super can remain in super on his death? Since Danielle is over the $1.6m limit I would have expected that once the 12 months period of grace has expired after Simon's death, all of his super would have to be taken out.

Phil Brady
February 16, 2017

I think that's covered in option 1 post July 17 scenario

February 16, 2017

Simons super of $1.6mn reverts to Danielle as a recessionary pension. Danielle is then able to roll her $1.9 million benefit back to the accumulation phase. But you are quite right that If Simon had say $1.9 million in super, then Danielle could only take $1.6 as a reversionary pension and the extra $300k would need to come out as a death benefit lump sum


Leave a Comment:



When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

Minister Jane Hume on SMSFs and superannuation reform


Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.