Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 173

Unconventional monetary policy is now conventional

The speech delivered by Janet Yellen, Chair of the Federal Reserve, on 26 August 2016 at the Jackson Hole symposium titled The Federal Reserve’s Monetary Policy Toolkit: Past, Present, and Future offered a unique insight into how the Fed (and by implication how other global central banks) will conduct monetary policy in the years ahead.

‘Equilibrium’ cash rate lowest in 50 years

There is a need to build policy resiliency and flexibility, which is especially important with the equilibrium or normal real cash rate materially lower than it has been over the 40 years leading up to the GFC. In practical terms, the normal real cash rate is where inflation is seen to be stable and output on average is close to potential. It is entirely plausible the normal real cash rate is now close to zero, compared to around 2.5% in the past. Significantly, the result is that the scope to raise nominal interest rates to levels that prevailed in past cycles will be very limited and unnecessary given the future prospects for growth and inflation.

The subdued medium-term growth and inflation outlook reflects weaker employment and productivity outcomes inhibiting consumption, a lack of attractive projects for capital investment, and demographic factors such as declining population growth. In some countries such as Japan and across Europe, the issue is more acute and this is where official cash rates have been moved into negative territory. There is strong evidence that negative rates have arrested a steeper decline in output and growth than otherwise – especially in the absence of the political and economic power to expand fiscal policy when sovereign debt burdens were so high.

Janet Yellen has messaged several important thematics shaping the Fed‘s thinking, including the future monetary policy framework which will include an expanded monetary policy toolkit. There is no going back to the conventional and simple adjustments to the policy cash rate. The so-called unconventional monetary policy measures will remain in scope for years to come. This means central banks will have much larger balance sheets, they will continue to use forward guidance, make targeted asset purchases and, as required, change the level of interest rate paid on excess reserves banks hold with the central bank.

Negative rates counterproductive

By its omission, it may be concluded that the US toolkit does not contemplate negative official cash rates. There is mounting evidence that negative rates adversely impact bank profitability which could ultimately weaken the stability of the financial system and at its extreme becomes a tax on savers. In parts of Europe, depositors are paying banks to leave their money on deposit, with a potential adverse impact on investor and consumer confidence. It can encourage distortions in other asset prices as investors hunt for yield.

We are also seeing a divergence in approach across central banks in the tools employed. This reflects a few factors – including weaker inflation and economic performance and the way the credit channel operates in different economies. For example, the European Central Bank, having moved to negative rates and purchased significant proportions of the European sovereign debt market, are now buying corporate debt. This reduces the cost of corporate borrowing by driving yields lower. Yellen’s speech alluded to this approach: the ability if required to expand the types of assets purchased to be added to the toolkit. The Bank of Japan seems set to continue its expansion of balance sheets and further moves into negative rates, although clearly mindful of unintended consequences.

Even if rates rise, the peak will be very low

So where does this end? Not any time soon because there is no real alternative. Rates are set to remain very low for a long time with punctuations of volatility but not a sustained rise. We continue to look for a handoff to fiscal policy and even a recognition that some bank regulation is a disincentive to capital investment and inhibits the free flow of capital. For the Fed, a further policy tightening is likely before end 2016. Yellen refers to the asymmetry of risks and that there is no pre-set path. This is why the Fed’s approach will be gradual and data dependent. The nominal Fed funds rate peak in this cycle may be as low as 2%.

 

Anne Anderson is Head of Fixed Income at UBS Australia. This article is general information and does not consider any investor’s circumstances.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Trusting the process in a high-rate environment

Can quantitative tightening help tame inflation?

Which asset class in Australia offers the best value now?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Super crosses the retirement Rubicon

Australia's superannuation system faces a 'Rubicon' moment, a turning point where the focus is shifting from accumulation phase to retirement readiness, but unfortunately, many funds are not rising to the challenge.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Indexation of Division 296 tax isn't enough

Labor is reviewing the $3 million super tax's most contentious aspects: lack of indexation and the tax on unrealised gains. Those fighting for change shouldn’t just settle for indexation of the threshold.

Shares

Will ASX dividends rise over the next 12 months?

Market forecasts for ASX dividend yields are at a 30-year low amid fears about the economy and the capacity for banks and resource companies to pay higher dividends. This pessimism seems overdone.

Shares

Expensive market valuations may make sense

World share markets seem toppy at first glance, though digging deeper reveals important nuances. While the top 2% of stocks are pricey, they're also growing faster, and the remaining 98% are inexpensive versus history.

Fixed interest

The end of the strong US dollar cycle

The US dollar’s overvaluation, weaker fundamentals, and crowded positioning point to further downside. Diversifying into non-US equities and emerging market debt may offer opportunities for global investors.

Investment strategies

Today’s case for floating rate notes

Market volatility and uncertainty in 2025 prompt the need for a diversified portfolio. Floating Rate Notes offer stability, income, and protection against interest rate risks, making them a valuable investment option.

Strategy

Breaking down recent footy finals by the numbers

In a first, 2025 saw AFL and NRL minor premiers both go out in straight sets. AFL data suggests the pre-finals bye is weakening the stranglehold of top-4 sides more than ever before.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.