Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 249

$1 million v $500,000 and accepting a pension

The article on why $1 million is always superior to $500,000 despite the potential loss of franking credits and age pension attracted many worthy comments. A reader, John Hyslop, asked about self-funding a retirement and staying off the age pension. John asked:

“This is a powerful analysis with great supporting graphics. Could you please run some numbers on two other couples?

Let’s use the same basic assumptions as in your article but with a different mindset. The couples have always been self-reliant. They realise that they have been fortunate to save well, with generous taxpayer help in tax concessions, and essentially tax-free retirement. They are concerned that coming generations are being asked to fund a great lifestyle.

They aim to refrain from being on the age pension for as long as possible can. They realise that they can live a good life on $50k p.a. They will avoid major house extensions or ‘unnecessary’ spending simply to qualify for the age pension. Although being forced to make annual withdrawals from their SMSF, they could build up another investment reserve fund outside super using any surpluses.

Could you re-run the numbers to assess when they ‘have to’ go on the pension and with the possibility of being able to leave some inheritance for the kids? I believe the system is unsustainable and is likely to produce inter-generational conflict.”

Hi John

Under age pension rules, a couple can have a home of unlimited value and receive a full age pension if their other assets are worth less than $380,500. The pension cuts out when assets exceed $837,000.

The couple with $500,000 will be eligible for a part-pension from the start which will make up half their annual income. The couple with $1,000,000 will start to receive a part-pension when they reach age 72 after drawing down some of their capital. Using the minimum drawdown rule would not impact the period until they become eligible for age pension because from age 65 to 75, the minimum drawdown rate is 5%, the same as the investment return.

The charts below show:

  1. Both couples will go on the age pension, unless they feel strongly that they should not be a ‘burden’ on the budget. This is typical of most retirees as even with compulsory superannuation since 1992, it is expected that 70% of Australians of eligibility age will still be drawing a part-pension by 2055 (see 2015 Intergenerational Report).
  2. When the Smiths become eligible for the age pension, they also receive their franking refunds (assuming not in an SMSF), and no longer need to drawdown capital to spend $50,000 a year.
  3. Due to the more modest lifestyle, neither couple runs out of other capital, so there will always be something in reserve for unexpected costs or a bequest.

It’s especially interesting to contrast the consequences of living on $50,000 versus $80,000 (in the previous article), with both couples trading off greater financial security for a lesser lifestyle, assuming money delivers lifestyle benefits.

Smiths ($1 million) versus Joneses ($500,000) based on $50,000 annual expenditure

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. My thanks to quantitative analyst Estelle Liu for assisting with the calculations.

8 Comments
Dudley
April 14, 2019

Until the home owning couple's capital reduces to less than the asset test $840,000 limit the comparison is between the risk free Age Pension and a risk free investment.

A home owning Age Pensioner couple with $0 capital receives a risk free $36,000 per year indexed to the highest of Wage, Consumer Price or Beneficiary Living Cost inflation.

A home owning Self Funded couple with $1,000,000 capital earning 1% real risk free has an income of $10,000 per year. To receive risk free $36,000 per year they need $3,600,000 invested at 1% real.

Graham Hand
April 13, 2019

Hi KW, Thanks for your comment. Please note, we are not licensed to give personal financial advice, and we don't know your full circumstances.

We also do not know the credentials of people who respond. They might not be properly qualified.

A better approach would be for you to contact a good financial adviser.

Graham
April 22, 2018

Hi Neil, assuming Labor is elected and can pass its plans, they announced a 'pensioner guarantee' that anyone on an age or disability pension will receive excess franking credits, including future pensioners. The date you mention (28 March 2018) specifically applies to SMSFs, where the SMSF must have had at least one member on a pension on that date to receive the franking credit refund. Disadvantages SMSFs. 'Pensioner' in this context does not mean a person with an SMSF drawing a pension from their fund.

Neil
April 22, 2018

Just to clarify, my previous comment is assuming the ALP form government and get its changes passed. My understanding might be wrong; that a person who was receiving an Age pension on the day the changes were announced keeps ALL franking credits. If one BECOMES an Ap after that one does not.

Laine
April 22, 2018

Neil

Any aged pensioner will still receive the full franking credits on their individual income with any excess refunded as cash. This is regardless of when they first became (or become) an aged pensioner.

Any aged pensioner who was a pensioner as at 28 March this year will also continue to receive the excess franking credits within their SMSF.

If you were not a pensioner at that date but later become one, you will receive the refund of unused franking on your individual income but not within your SMSF.

All this applies to a change in the system which is not yet law and may never become law.

There is also talk of them backdating their proposed changes to capital gains tax so the new rate affects any property bought from 1 July 2017.

Does this mean theat if you buy in 2017 and sell in 2018 after holding for more than one year and the ALP form govt in 2019 they can come back and charge you extra tax ???

How can anyone plan anything with these sorts of ad hoc and back dated policies.

Neil
April 22, 2018

"When the Smiths become eligible for the age pension, they also receive their franking refunds (assuming not in an SMSF),"? How So? There is no return of franking credits other than to offset tax liability.

Mark Reynolds
April 19, 2018

Is it just me, or is the assumption about franking credits "becoming available again once on the aged pension:, an acceptance by the author that the current government is doomed, and labor is set to win the next Federal election?

Bill Buttler
April 19, 2018

Thanks for this article. It's great to read something aimed at the man in the street for a change. $500k is a realistic target for most employed Australians, who cannot hope for the luxury of being able to live off income in perpetuity. However, there is a major qualification in the shape of the planning risk of relying on the continuation of current Age Pension eligibility rules.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Super is delivering for people about to retire

$1 million is never worth less than $500,000

Retirement: Making income the outcome

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.