Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 255

Blue skies for consumers, caution for investors

"Blue skies, Smiling at me

Nothing but blue skies, Do I see."

- Composed by Irving Berlin in 1926

The equities bull market is excited by the potential for technology to continue to change the world. Among many examples, Waymo, Zoox and Uber are developing self-driving cars, Amazon is employing AI rather than human cashiers in automated grocery stores, Facebook is mining your behaviour and predicting your next move for advertisers, Titomic and CSIRO have built the world’s largest 3D titanium printer, another 3D printer manufactured a human kidney, and just about every auto manufacturer is racing towards electric vehicles. Meanwhile, global spending on AI and machine learning is forecast to grow from $12 billion last year to $58 billion by 2021.

It’s almost impossible not to be caught up in the wave, but investors need to remember that the rapid advances in technology have been funded by a record supply of money at the lowest interest rates in history. When technology has changed the world in the past, investors didn’t always win.

Often, the consumer reaps the benefits. From Moore’s Law accurately predicting the doubling of transistors per chip every two years, to Koomey’s Law observing that the energy of computation is halved every 18 months, or Kryder’s Law showing the number of bits that can fit onto shrinking hard drives doubles every 18 months, and Swanson’s Law that states the cost of the photovoltaic cells needed to generate solar power falls by 20% with each doubling of manufacturing capacity, we find a lot of evidence that companies need to run faster and faster just to stand still.

As the sales volume rises, supplier returns decline because the technology becomes commoditized and cheaper. This is great for customers and the planet, not so good for shareholders who are swept up in the excitement of the new, new thing - as investors may yet discover.

Is Australia different?

Australia is not immune from the exuberance gripping parts of the equity market, such as the valuations of emerging disrupters such as Kogan, Pushpay, Getswift, and Afterpay.

One of the best performing industrial stocks over nearly two years has been Kogan (ASX:KGN), established in 2006. Despite the threat from Amazon, its share price has rocketed from around $1.50 a year ago to around $9.00 today. According to its Wikipedia entry, it has a “portfolio of retail and services businesses including Kogan Retail (the and retail websites), Kogan Marketplace, Kogan Mobile, Kogan Internet, Kogan Insurance, Kogan Health, Kogan Pet Insurance, Kogan Life Insurance and Kogan Travel.”

Despite the spread of interests, Kogan derives over 90% of its gross profit from its core e-commerce retail business selling private label and third-party products.

Based on most recent numbers, the founder Ruslan Kogan appears to be a solid operator of the core business. Through “sourcing, analytics and automation”, Kogan’s gross profit margin was 17.9% at the end of FY17, compared to 15.5% the year prior.

The company has also strongly improved various metrics recently. As at June 30, 2017, the company claimed to have 955,000 active customers, representing a 36% increase from FY16. For the six months to December 2017, revenue at the online retailer jumped 45.7% to $209.62 million and reported profit was 470% higher at $8.33 million. Keep in mind, however, that in the prior period there was $3 million of costs associated with the IPO. Add back those costs into the prior period and the jump in profit isn’t as high.

On 23 April 2018, the company provided its Appendix 4C Cash Flow Statement for the quarter ended 31 March 2018 (3QFY18) and reported revenue growth of 46.1% and active customers of 1,288,000 or 5% of the Australian population.

But while Kogan displays growth, sound management, and popularity amongst shoppers, investment returns are determined by a company’s future prospects. We must ask whether the determinants of the company’s future are beyond management’s control.

Perhaps this is the reason new ‘verticals’ such as mobile and pet insurance are being explored by Kogan. Kogan has, for example, entered the mobile phone services space and has grown gross sales from a standing start in 2016 to $3.6 million in FY17, and has also launched an internet service offering unlimited NBN data plans for as little as $58.90 per month.

While they are currently small divisions, they leverage the Kogan’s database, and bring to the company a stream of recurring revenues, something retailing lacks. But these new verticals are already populated by larger and more established rivals. And in the case of internet service providers, margins are also generally under pressure.

Competition from the global giants

When the much larger and deeper-pocketed Amazon announced its entry into Australia, Kogan’s response was to welcome additional competition, citing ‘online retail’ accounting for about 7.5% of the total Australian retail market, compared to 20% for economies with a large marketplace player such as an Amazon or an Alibaba.

A similar response was offered by A2 Milk, upon news the global food giant Nestle had entered the Chinese market with its own A2 protein baby-milk formula. A2M told that it is “uniquely positioned to benefit from expansion of the category over time”.

Perhaps Kogan and A2 Milk should ask Woolies and Myer how they felt after the arrival of Aldi and Zara respectively.

Amazon recently announced that a fulfilment centre would be operational in the second half of 2018 in Moorebank, south west of Sydney. The location sits in the middle of one of Australia’s biggest retail markets, ensuring fast delivery to a significant proportion of its customers, many of whom may have previously shopped with Kogan. Amazon’s move may also increase product selection and support more third-party sellers using Amazon’s marketplace and fulfilment services.

Research results from US tech giant Pitney Bowes showed widespread dissatisfaction among Australian shoppers with local merchants, with 88% choosing to shop through overseas retailers in the past year. Almost nine out of 10 Australians shop through offshore e-merchants.

With Amazon Australia now offering goods from more than 5,000 sellers — making it the fastest-growing Amazon marketplace in the world, ahead even of India – it could be more challenging for domestic e-commerce providers to continue to claim a unique selling proposition.

Australia is a small country with few global winners. However, investors are betting that all of the latest batch of upstarts are going to win despite much larger global rivals and low barriers to entry. In the short run, popularity determines returns, but ultimately share prices cannot help but follow business performance.

Australia’s crop of disrupters need to be watched closely, especially when share prices are implying uninterrupted double-digit growth.


Roger Montgomery is Chairman and Chief Investment Officer at Montgomery Investment Management. This article is in the nature of general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

What do you expect from your portfolio today?

Investing in global disruption, four years on


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.