Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 337

Fewer new LICs and LITs in 2019, but more funds raised

Eight new listed investment companies (LICs) and listed investment trusts (LITs) joined the ASX in 2019. This was two less than in 2018, however, the $4.1 billion in funds raised via initial public offers exceeded the $3.3 billion raised by the sector in 2018 due to a lift in the size of the average raising. The biggest surprise of the year was the dominance of fixed interest funds, which were largely absent before the last two years.

The largest transaction was by KKR Credit Income Fund (ASX:KKC) which raised $925 million in November, followed by Magellan High Conviction Trust (ASX:MHH) which issued $862 million in October. The smallest raising was by Pengana Private Equity Trust (ASX:PE1) which raised $205 million in April. PE1 expects to return to the market early in 2020 for a secondary raising.

Discounts as market caps and volumes increase

Despite the new LICs and LITs joining the ASX, overall numbers remain unchanged at 114 at the end of November. This reflects the removal of some LICs and LITs due to mergers, acquisitions and restructuring. Poor price performance was often the cause of the decision to close. Leading names issued in prior years, such as L1 Capital (ASX:LSF) and Antipodes Global (ASX:APL), have traded at discounts around 20%, which would once have been considered highly unlikely. Most equity LICs have struggled to match the rapid rise in the index during 2019. 

We expect further corporate activity in 2020, with Ellerston Global Investments (ASX:EGI) already flagging its potential conversion to a trust structure to overcome the disappointing discount to Net Tangible Asset (NTA) prevalent in the sector.

Despite the unchanged total number, the market cap of LICs and LITs increased from $41.3 billion at 30 November 2018 to $52.1 billion at 30 November 2019. This reflects three factors:

  • LICs and LITs that were removed were at the smaller end of the universe
  • A significant number of secondary market raisings by existing LICs and LITs
  • A strong year for markets led to an increase in portfolio values in 2019.

Retail money eager to invest 

With interest rates remaining low, there is still plenty of retail money looking for a home and this enabled existing LICs and LITs to tap the market for new funds. There were a significant number of secondary market raisings across the sector in 2019 with all the existing fixed income LITs returning to the market for additional funds. This should continue in 2020 with some players already foreshadowing raisings for early in the new year.

2019 also saw an uptick in both trading volumes and value as larger and more liquid issues replaced the smaller and less liquid vehicles. The rolling 12-month average number of transactions was up 42.1% and the rolling 12-month average traded value was up 26.6% through to the end of November 2019.

The year of yield

2019 will definitely go down as the year that the credit-focused fixed income asset class really established itself in the sector. Since January 2019, total assets under management in the fixed income asset class rose from $1.25 billion to over $5 billion at the end of November 2019. Four new listings during the year saw the fixed income group grow to eight.

The demand for yield from retail investors has intensified in 2019. However, we remind investors that this asset class has different risk features and the risks associated with these products must be understood before investing. Each fixed income LITs has its own unique features. 

Falling premiums and widening discounts

One additional feature of the sector over the course of 2019 was the reduction in the number of issues trading at premiums and the widening, or dogged persistence, of discounts. Capital management initiatives such as on market buybacks designed to eliminate or narrow these discounts have had limited impact. Here are the five largest premiums and discounts from the LICs we follow.

We have noticed some narrowing of discounts in selected LICs in recent weeks and expect this to continue in the new year. Continued corporate activity could be a catalyst for discounts to narrow across the sector. Whilst we think there are some good opportunities for smart investors to enter well-managed issues at a discount, it’s always important to identify a potential catalysts for a narrowing of the discount. Issues with poorly-performing portfolios are unlikely to see their discounts reduce in a hurry in the absence of a takeover offer.

Access the latest IIR Report with a more detailed list of issues and their discounts and premiums for December 2019 here.

 

Peter Rae is Supervisory Analyst at Independent Investment Research. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   18 December 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Listed bond funds leap into market gap

How can the worst feature of LICs also be the best?

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved. 

Superannuation

How much super should you have?

Average super balances are one of the most misleading benchmarks. They ignore your goals, spending and future needs, creating a false sense of security. Here is how I calculate exactly where I need to be at every decade.

Retirement

Retiring from work is easy, retiring into life is harder

Most people spend decades planning how to retire. Far fewer plan for what comes next. The biggest retirement challenge isn't always financial, and it often catches even the most prepared retirees completely off guard.

Shares

Right asset class, wrong index: the trap in Australian small caps

Most Australian portfolios are concentrated in large caps, with relatively little exposure to smaller companies. But what if the biggest risk isn't the economy, interest rates or valuations? For many, the risk is hidden in plain sight. 

Property

Are these assets the missing piece in Australian portfolios?

Many investors remain concentrated in shares, cash and property. Despite their popularity among institutional investors, real assets remain underrepresented in many SMSF portfolios. Could they be the missing piece?

Investment strategies

The biggest risk that buy-and-hold investors ignore

Investors spend decades learning how to stay invested, yet few have a plan for getting out. When a financial goal has a hard deadline, a worked example shows why a fixed derisking schedule should outrank buy-and-hold discipline.

Investment strategies

How passive investing is driving the decline of active fund alpha

Why have active managers struggled as passive investing has surged? Research suggests that flows into index funds and ETFs are creating structural headwinds, penalising the stock-picking strategies that once generated alpha.  

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.