Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 192

HNW asset allocation and advice trends

In an advanced look at the results, the 2016 Investment Trends High Net Worth (HNW) Investor Report updates research on the use of advisers and the latest asset allocations.

The study is based on 2,500 responses from HNWs with investible assets (excluding super in public funds but including SMSF balances) of over $1 million, net of debt. This group is estimated to control about $9 billion of the $1.5 trillion held by all HNWs in Australia.

Some highlights include:

 

1. The number of HNWs in Australia fell to 425,000 in 2016 from 440,000 in 2015, partly due to market conditions and partly because of using debt to invest in property. The number with $2.5 million and above is growing.

 

2. The main investment problem identified by half the respondents is they are seeking growth in their portfolios but don’t expect it will come from Australian shares in 2017 (their return expectations have recovered somewhat since bottoming in September 2016, but they are still bearish). They know they should not allocate significantly to cash.

 

3. As expected in such uncertain times, there is an increasing unmet need for advice. Says Recep III Peker, Research Director at Investment Trends, “Over half of HNWs have large unmet needs for advice. In spite of this, they are increasingly reticent to seek advice, and the use of advisers is falling. Financial planners and full service stock brokers are losing ground, especially for investment advice.”

 

The changes for full service stockbrokers are particularly challenging. Those who have retained clients have a more holistic relationship, including in asset classes other than equities. But only 40% will actually call themselves a stockbroker, with most preferring names such as ‘wealth managers’, signifying a more diversified offering. They have not become ‘financial planners’, but their businesses are changing. For example, they commonly sell global ETFs to give their clients an international equity exposure.

 

 

4. Asset allocation has not changed significantly in last few years. The top-level asset distribution is 32% direct shares, 32% property, 16% cash and TDs and the rest in listed or unlisted managed funds and alternatives. Geographically, the proportion of assets overseas averages only 5%, although for the wealthy with assets $10m+, it is a much higher 10%.

 

Uncertain times and stretched market values seem to have paralysed reallocation. The amount in cash and TDs has fallen slightly by 1% to 16% in the last two years, despite uncertainty in the share market, due to low rates. HNWs in Australia are estimated to be holding $240 billion in cash, with $100 billion temporarily waiting for better market conditions.

 

 

The proportion of HNWs planning to invest in managed funds remained at 20% in 2016. About half of these HNWs want actively managed international equity funds, and two in five seek active Australian equity funds. Says Peker, “It’s been a bit of a missed opportunity that the industry has not grown its share of the HNW pie, but there is still good appetite for managed funds.”

 

The number of HNWs who have direct property has increased but average holding size has come down, perhaps indicating property is held in an SMSF.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks and this preliminary release is courtesy of Investment Trends.

  •   2 March 2017
  • 7
  •      
  •   
7 Comments
VeryAverageJoe
March 02, 2017

Graham, hi, interested you cherry-picked one quote from Uncle Warren's annual missive without mentioned the shellaking he gave the funds management trade for their collective results v low cost index thumping given over his 10 year comparison bet. Don't ask the barber if you need a haircut, right?! Reader's might like to start at page 21 of the recent Berkshire 2016 letter (google it) while I keep reading Where are All the Customer's Yachts? Funds management has it's place and purpose no doubt, but the lofty heights may not always be that place. Cheers matey, C.

Graham Hand
March 02, 2017

Hi VAJ, not sure a 'cherry pick' is fair when I simply quoted one optimistic line from Buffett that had nothing to do with funds management. Cuffelinks has published many articles on the index v active debate, showing how most active managers struggle to outperform. Not defending it, but his comparison bet was against a basket of hedge funds, where the fees are higher than the 'average' long-only manager. Certainly, indexing has a role in many portfolios.

VeryAverageJoe
March 02, 2017

Hi Graham, fair call. My bad. Cheers, C.

Roger
March 03, 2017

Thanks for the article, Graham. Interesting that your bar charts have no segment for 'bonds - listed plus unlisted'. I understand the allocation is indeed low - far too low, according to many standards.

Andrew Varlamos
March 14, 2017

Thanks Graham. How do you interpret the first graph: specifically, who are the "advisers" who are not giving investment advice? Accountants? Or insurance agents/advisers? Does the study explain this?
Cheers
Andrew

Graham
March 14, 2017

Hi Andrew. Recep has provided this clarification: The main driver of the gap between the two metrics are accountants for tax advice, who were used by nearly half of HNWs in 2016. Even accountants have lost ground over the past few years, with the share of relationships falling from 56% in 2013 to 48% in 2016.

Andrew Varlamos
March 14, 2017

Thanks Graham

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Five charts show predicaments facing financial advice

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.