Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 594

How can you not be bullish the US?

Great question. (Wish I had asked it 5, 10 or 15 years ago.) Near-term – say, to pick a random date, until 20 January 2025 – momentum may stay with the US trade. But beyond that US equities look rich, their EPS advantage may narrow, rising bond yields may crimp returns, and the next cycle – which isn’t here yet – should favour other markets. I’m not convinced Trump can offset these headwinds.

Who’s not bullish the US? Exhibit 1 – nicked from Torsten Slok – shows the share of US consumers expecting higher equity prices is now at an all-time high. The AAII survey is also high (not at a record). So is Mike Hartnett’s BoA fund manager survey. I don’t know when this will peak. The bulls can project their hopes and dreams on the President-elect until inauguration day (20 January 2025).

Exhibit 1: Everyone (almost) expects higher equity prices

Source: Conference Board, NBER; Minack Advisors (thanks Torsten Slok)

The key to US exceptionalism has been earnings out-performance. Since 2016 EPS-driven out-performance has been enhanced by the US market rerating versus other markets (Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: Earnings drove most (not all) US exceptionalism

Source: MSCI, IBES/DataStream, NBER; Minack Advisors

That rerating coincided with a widening gap between US and non-US long-run EPS forecasts. The gap between expected US and non-US long-run EPS growth is now at 8%, a record, excluding 4 months in the GFC (Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 3: US exceptionalism is for the long run

Source: MSCI, IBES/DataStream, NBER; Minack Advisors

I doubt that US EPS growth will outpace the rest of the world’s by that much. Even if it does, that superior EPS growth is now in the price. Exhibit 4 shows prospective PE ratios based on long-run (5 years ahead) EPS level. The US market has re-rated relative to other developed markets even after taking into account its faster long-run EPS growth.

Exhibit 4: US is expensive even with exceptional EPS

Source: MSCI, IBES/DataStream, NBER; Minack Advisors

The US market is expensive relative to its own history, relative to other markets and relative to other assets. The prospective earnings yield is now in line with the 10-year Treasury yield (Exhibit 5). I expect 10-year yields to breach 5% in 2025. At some stage rising long-end yields will be a headwind for equity valuations in the US.

Exhibit 5: Exceptional valuation at risk from bond yields

Source: MSCI, IBES/DataStream, Bloomberg, NBER; Minack Advisors

The post-GFC cycle saw unusually strong US EPS growth and unusually weak EPS growth outside the US. Why will that change? The principal reason why ex-US EPS has been so weak since the GFC is that earnings had ballooned to unsustainable levels before the GFC. EPS in US$ terms quadrupled between 2002 and 2008. That EPS bubble bursting kept EPS weak for several years. However, rest of world EPS is now back on its pre-bubble trend and has resumed normal growth through the past few years (Exhibit 6).

Exhibit 6: The rest of the world back on EPS growth trend

Source: MSCI, NBER; Minack Advisors

US EPS has grown at an above-average pace since the GFC: 4% real over the past decade versus a long run average of 1.75%. Most of that exceptional growth – and most of the recent US EPS out-performance versus other markets – is due to the Magnificent 7 (Exhibit 7). I don’t analyse single names, so I don’t have a strong view on how long the Magnificent 7 can maintain EPS growth at recent rates. At some stage the law of large numbers will have to kick in. But several clients have commented that 2025 will be the ‘show me the money’ year where investors will want companies to show the payoff for the massive investment in artificial intelligence. If the returns aren’t there, valuations could fall.

Exhibit 7: Mag 7 explains most of US EPS exceptionalism

Source: Bloomberg, IBES/DataStream, MSCI, NBER; Minack Advisors

Much of the recent EPS out-performance of the S&P493 versus the rest of the world has been driven by diverging macro growth rates (Exhibit 8). However, I expect the growth gap between the US and the rest of the world to narrow in 2025.

Exhibit 8: This was not the year for RoW recovery

Source: Bloomberg, NBER; Minack Advisors

Mr Trump’s election has turbocharged US outperformance. While there may be a few sectors that benefit from specific policies, it’s not clear to me that Trump locks in sustained US equity outperformance. The cycle gap between the US and non-US markets should narrow next year. The prospect of higher long-end yields is a greater threat to the expensive US market. Mag 7 performance will be tested if AI underwhelms. And everyone is so bullish the US, who’s not already in?

 

Gerard Minack founded Minack Advisors in 2013 and has a wealth of experience as a macro strategist.

This article contains material based upon publicly available information, obtained from sources considered reliable, and is not soliciting any action based upon it. Opinions expressed are current as of the date of publication. All forecasts and statements about the future, even if presented as fact, should be treated as judgments, and neither Minack Advisors Pty Ltd nor its partners can be held responsible for any failure of those judgments to prove accurate. Minack Advisors Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC, authorised representative number 443937.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

2025: Another bullish year ahead for equities?

That’s racing: financial markets and wagering parallels

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.