Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 379

Is currency exposure an unwanted risk or source of returns?

Australia is a small, open economy which compels superannuation funds, fund managers and other large investors to look offshore for investment opportunities. In round terms, the market cap of the Australian Securities Exchange is $2 trillion and superannuation assets alone are almost $3 trillion.

Australians investing overseas

There are three main rationales for expanding investment horizons beyond domestic markets:

  • To uncover and exploit a much larger opportunity set to add to returns
  • To add diversification to the portfolio as a way of reducing risk
  • To move more ‘invisibly’ in offshore listed markets compared to the relatively small Australian market where large investors are liable to leave a ‘footprint’ and push market prices unfavourably as they place large trades into the market (the technical concept of investment strategy ‘capacity’).

Investing offshore, of course, brings a new portfolio dimension into play:  currency risk. Generally, any offshore asset in which an Australian investor invests is actually a bundle of two exposures – the risk/return of the asset itself, measured in the currency in which the asset is denominated (‘local currency’), and the value by which the investor’s ‘base currency’ (AUD) moves in relation to this local currency over the holding period – the currency exchange rate movement.

Here’s how this breaks down over the past decade for an investment in index-tracking (passive) international equities:

 

Developed & Emerging Markets
(MSCI All Countries World Index)

 

1 yr

5 yrs

10 yrs

Local currency

14.63%

10.11%

10.67%

Currency movement

(8.47%)

(0.83%)

1.29%

Base currency (AUD)

6.16%

9.28%

11.96%

Source: MSCI, Parametric. Reflects Accumulation Index returns (net), pre-tax, annualised over performance periods ended 31 August 2020. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Major impact of currency return

The ‘currency movement’ contribution to returns (capturing the difference between the portfolio’s local currency and actual AUD experience) are meaningful, especially over shorter time periods. Data informing investment decisions should always reflect the investor’s base currency – what is actually relevant to the investor.

To illustrate this, the comparable 1-year return for Developed Markets (only) equities was 14.39% in local currency terms, which lags the 14.63% All Countries return noted above, making it look like adding Emerging Markets was a good tactic. However, the AUD Developed Markets return was 6.39%, outperforming the AUD All Countries return of 6.16%

It shows in fact that expanding to Emerging Markets was a losing bet from an Australian perspective.

Of course, a sophisticated investor can currency-hedge the portfolio to reduce or remove the currency risk and isolate the particular exposure offered by the underlying assets (the ‘local currency’ performance). To currency-hedge, large superannuation funds typically use a series of ongoing trades in currency forwards (derivative contracts) whose pay-offs move in the opposite direction to the exchange rate movement of the underlying asset.

This does not quite mean that a fund fully currency-hedging its international equities over the last decade would have received 10.67%, though the fund’s AUD return should have been similar. Why? Because few currency hedges perfectly offset the underlying exposure and, even if they do, currency hedging comes at a cost.

For example, the Emerging Markets component of the above All Countries equities portfolio would have been difficult to currency-hedge in practice due to the limited liquidity in hedging instruments and regulatory restrictions on trading the currencies of some countries.

Particular attention needs to be paid to how to fund the ongoing rolling of the currency forwards (because these cashflows do not match the cashflows of the underlying hedged physical asset), and also to the tax implications of the hedge.

In other words, the currency hedge is of the pre-tax financial performance of the investment, not post-tax, nor does it hedge (offset) the actual cashflows required or generated under the hedging arrangement.

Currency as a source of return

Currency management is changing from ‘risk mitigation’ to currency as a potential return source. This promising new chapter in currency thinking marks an evolution which began in the early days of compulsory superannuation in Australia (the 1990s), when a typical balanced equities/fixed income global investment portfolio would have the growth assets (equities) unhedged and the defensive assets (fixed income) fully hedged. Effectively, currency exposure was treated like a growth asset, appropriate for fund members with a reasonable time horizon and risk appetite.

In the 2000s, the idea of a setting a static ‘hedging ratio’ for offshore equities came to the fore, like a targeted 50% hedged, 50% unhedged exposure. This ‘least regret’ approach meant that, given the volatility inherent in currency, a hedged/unhedged combination would not overwhelm the underlying equity performance (if the AUD rallied) nor overly damage the results (if the AUD deteriorated) over successive performance periods.

Today, this classic balanced portfolio is more likely to have about 28% of the equities and 61% of the fixed income currency-hedged (APRA quarterly superannuation statistics – June 2020).

The thesis that currency can be a return source is being pursued in programmes to dynamically adjust currency hedging ratios and ‘tilt’ to or from currency positions based on shorter-term views around whether the AUD (or any other currency) is over- or under-valued and how global macro-economic themes will impact the currency’s supply and demand.

Few of these sophisticated, dynamic currency management programmes have been around for long enough to build up a long-term track record. As they do, it will be fascinating to see whether currency, long seen as an unwelcome risk in global portfolios, can make a successful, remarkable transition to becoming a valued source of returns.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment adviser. This material is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Additional information is available at parametricportfolio.com.au.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Five principles from the lost decade of value investing

The role of financial markets when earnings are falling

After 30 years of investing, I prefer to skip this party

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.

Retirement

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.