Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 51

Stock market Olympics, and the winners are -

Which countries won the medals in the race to beat their pre-GFC stock market highs?

Global stock markets peaked in late 2007 at the top of the global credit boom, before plunging 50% or more in the 2008-2009 GFC. Since then some countries have done better than others. At one extreme, the Venezuelan market has kept on rising without missing a beat throughout the GFC and the 2011 sovereign debt crisis, despite suffering severe domestic political and economic crises. Other markets have just kept going down (with the occasional minor recovery), like Greece, Cyprus, Slovakia, Slovenia, Jordan, Morocco, and Italy. Most markets are still somewhere between their late 2007 highs and their early 2009 lows.

The medal table

The following chart shows the current index levels for 60 major stock markets (as at Monday 24 February 2014) relative to their pre-GFC all-time highs.

AO snip1 Ed51

AO snip1 Ed51

The blue/orange bars indicate the current level of each stock market index relative to its all-time pre-GFC high, which for most countries was in late 2007. The black bars indicate the current level relative to the 2007 high if the all-time high was before 2007. For example the Thai market (FTSE SET index) is currently 43% above its 2007 peak but still 23% below its 1994 all-time peak (before the 1997 Asian crisis hit).

Many European markets had their all-time peaks in the 1999-2000 dot-com bubble, and today are still below both their 2007 peaks and their dot-com peaks. On the other hand Japan peaked at the end of 1989 and it may never see those levels again.

Australia is currently in 11th place among the developed markets (even NZ is beating us!). Since Australia is considered a ‘developed’ market with a mature economy, we are primarily interested in how we have gone against other developed markets.

(This study excludes the impact of dividends, inflation and exchange rates, and instead uses broad price index returns in local currencies in each country. In this way it reflects how local investors saw their local share price index move over time in nominal terms, which is the way most people think about stock markets in their own country).

Here are the medalists. We will cover each of the medal winners in more detail in later articles in this series.

Gold medal: Denmark

AO snip2 Ed51

In January 2013 Denmark became the first of the ‘developed’ country stock markets to reclaim and beat its pre-GFC high. It had peaked on 11 October 2007 at the top of the global credit bubble right before the GFC hit.

The Danish stock market had a similar experience to most other markets over the course of the past decade. After surging in the late 1990s dot-com boom it collapsed in the 2001-2002 tech wreck, rose strongly from early 2003 to October 2007, plunged 50+% in the GFC, rebounded strongly in 2009, but fell back in the 2011 sovereign debt crisis, and then surged during the 2012-2013 rally.

On paper, Denmark should not be a good place to do business, as it has:

  • an old and rapidly aging population
  • very high dependency ratio
  • the world’s highest minimum and average wage levels
  • the highest pensions in the world (as a percentage of pre-retired incomes)
  • the highest tax rates (top marginal tax rates above 60%, plus 25% VAT)
  • high social security costs (social expenditure takes up a mammoth 30% of GDP)
  • a huge government sector (the government employs more than one third of all workers)
  • heavy unionisation
  • mountains of stifling European regulations
  • a fixed currency
  • lack of natural resources
  • a location stuck on the edge of a decaying Europe in structural decline.

However it still manages to be a world class high-tech manufacturer and exporter with the best performing stock market in the developed world.

Silver medal: USA

The US was the second developed world stock market to reach new highs after the GFC. The S&P 500 index peaked at 1,527 on 24 March 2000 at the height of the dot-com frenzy, and then just beat that level with a new high of 1,565 on 9 October 2007. It then promptly plunged in the GFC to a trough that was lower even than the bottom of the 2001-2002 ‘tech-wreck’. In March 2013 the S&P500 index finally recovered and exceeded its dot-com and 2007 highs.

AO snip3 Ed51

Like Denmark, the US suffered a sharp and deep domestic contraction (the longest and deepest since the 1930s depression). The economy has only been saved from deflation and further contraction by the Federal Reserve’s zero interest rate policy and its unprecedented asset buying programs. Unemployment levels reached 10% in the sub-prime crisis and are still too high five years later. Economic growth is still relatively weak and bond yields have been rising since July 2012, but the stock market is soaring.

Bronze medal: UK

Like the US, the UK market also had an astronomical dot-com boom in 1999-2000. The all-time peak for the FTSE-100 index was 6,930, reached on the last day of December in 1999. This was not even beaten in the great 2003-2007 credit bubble, although it came within 3% of the 1999 high on 9 October 2007.

AO snip4 Ed51

Finally, 14 years after its peak, the long wait for a new high is almost over. On 22 May 2013 the index got to 6840 which was just 1% away from its dot-com peak of 6,930, and it is now (late February 2014) once again closing in on the peak.

The UK economy has drifted in and out of recession since 2008 and has suffered massive bank losses and nationalisations, high unemployment, weak consumer spending and sluggish business investment throughout the period, but share prices have soared.

In subsequent articles in this series we will take a look at the gold, silver and bronze medal markets in more detail and compare them with Australia’s performance (shown below).

AO snip5 Ed51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some conclusions

Most of the time economic growth has little to do with stock market performance. For example, Chinese economic growth has been the highest in the world over the past 20 years but it has had one of the worst performing stock markets for just about any period over the same 20 years (apart from a couple of bubble years which collapsed quickly). On the other hand Australia was the only developed economy not to suffer a recession in the GFC and it has had the highest level of economic growth during and since the GFC, but it has had one of the worst performing stock markets during and since the GFC.

A country like Demark can overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles and unfavourable business conditions and still manage to be a world class high-tech manufacturer and exporter with the best performing stock market in the developed world.

Australia does have some world class companies that compete and win on the world stage (such as CSL, News, Orica, Amcor, Computershare, ALS, Ansell, Ainsworth). However, because they are so rare they tend to be over-priced much of the time. The local stock market is still dominated by big miners and big cosseted oligopolies that control virtually every domestic market segment, including banking, insurance, retailing, food, telcos, gambling, gas, electricity, transport, airlines, and just about every other domestic industry in which listed companies operate. They are protected from real competition by high barriers to entry and by the same tyranny of distance they complain about.

Australian investors have a long standing home bias in favour of local companies and this has often been justified by pointing to the fact that our economic growth rates have been higher than the rest of the developed world. That doesn’t translate into stock market returns. There are many fine global companies that are based in other countries that operate in a whole range of sectors and industries that are not even represented on the local Australian stock market.

Part 2 of this series takes a closer look at the gold medallist Denmark and compare it with Australia.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The next big thing: global markets and the emerging consumer

How did you go? Australian and global stockmarket winners and losers

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 467

Fund manager reports for last financial year are drifting into client mailboxes, and many of the results are disappointing. With some funds giving back their 2021 gains, why did they not reduce their exposure to hot stocks when faced with rising inflation and rates?

  • 21 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 466 with weekend update

Heard the word, cakeism? As in, 'having your cake and eating it too'. The Reserve Bank wants to simultaneously fight inflation by taking away spending power, while not driving the economy into a recession. If you want to help, stop buying stuff.

  • 14 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 465 with weekend update

Many thanks for the thousands of revealing comments in our survey on retirement experiences. We discuss the full results. And with the ASX200 down 10%, the US S&P500 off 20% and bond prices tanking, each investor faces the new financial year deciding whether to sit, sell or invest more.

  • 7 July 2022

Latest Updates

Financial planning

Five charts show predicaments facing financial advice

The number of financial advisers in Australia has almost halved at a time of greater need than ever. What has happened to the industry and its clients as yet another Quality of Advice Review takes place?

Property

House price doomsayers: Could housing prices really fall by 20%?

Why do house prices move in an up-and-flat pattern rather than up-and-down like shares? When house prices start to fall, supply reduces to create a new equilibrium, rather than needing even more price reductions.

Latest from Morningstar

Why I’m not ready for an SMSF

SMSFs are increasing in popularity among younger investors, drawn by the investment control and fixed costs. But until a sufficient balance is achieved, it may be better to stay with a large fund.

Investment strategies

Six ways to take a ‘private equity’ approach in listed markets

By taking a private equity approach to investing in the public equity markets in this difficult market, investors can harness the 'best of both worlds' and still make superior returns over the long term.

Investment strategies

How to avoid being a bad investor

It's tough to become the 'best' investor in the world, but we can certainly avoid being the 'worst'. Here are graphical examples of some long-term principles to adopt, including the difficulty of timing the market.

Financial planning

The case for closing the financial gender gap

While the gender pay gap is slowly improving in the workplace, ATO data shows Australian men aged 55-59 average $50,000 more in super than women of the same age. Financial advisers have a role to play.

Property

Three opportunities in property in Australia and APAC

Rising interest rates and occupancy threats have reduced the share prices of many property companies and trusts, but the selling underestimates the strong pockets of demand and robust earnings from good tenants.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.