Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 217

The potential for a value revival

The Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard observed that, “Life can only be understood backward, but it must be lived forward.” With the benefit of hindsight, events of the past often seem rational, even inevitable, yet the present is always fraught with uncertainty. This could also be said about investing.

Today’s investment climate could be summed up as cautious and noticeably bereft of conviction. While global equity markets have more than doubled from GFC lows, investors remain concerned about central bank policies, currencies and commodities, among other issues.

Even so, our company’s conviction in value investing is strengthening as we try to “understand the market backwards”.

What is value investing?

Value investing is a strategy where stocks are selected that trade for less than their intrinsic values. Value investors seek out stocks they believe the market has undervalued. These differ from growth stocks, which are companies whose earnings are expected to grow at an above-average rate relative to the market.

Value investors believe the market overreacts to good and bad news, resulting in stock price movements that do not correspond with a company's long-term fundamentals, giving an opportunity to profit when the price is deflated.

Valuation gap is extreme

Value stocks remain historically cheap relative to growth stocks. In fact, the valuation gap between value and growth stocks on a Price to Book value (P/BV) is at an extreme not seen for some time (see chart below).

Investors would have to go back to the height of the ‘dotcom bubble’ in 2000 to find such extremes. Back then, interest in tech stocks was enormous, based on their perceived growth potential. Today, it is the consumer staples sector that is attracting market focus as investors look for growth stocks that offer the perception of safety and stability in an uncertain environment.

Value on the rebound

One of the stronger catalysts for a value revival is rising interest rates. In the past, value cycles have occurred when rising interest rates have corresponded with a strengthening economy, although some argue it is the stronger economy and inflationary pressures that were the real drivers of the value revival. Today, however, global economic growth is moderate and deflationary pressures persist.

While value can be pro-cyclically correlated to the economy, this isn’t always the case. For example, investors waiting for an improving economic cycle would have missed the value upturn in 2000. Investors fleeing value in anticipation of economic weakness would have missed value’s outperformance during the recession of 1981-82. In each of these instances, we believe stocks simply became too cheap and a reversion to the mean prompted a value rally.

Rather than economic growth, we consider valuation of stocks a far more accurate predictor of future returns and a value recovery. When it comes to value, today’s valuation starting point is distinctly compelling.

Value moving beyond 'the usual suspects'

Since the GFC, value stocks have been primarily concentrated in either the resource sectors such as energy and materials or rate-sensitive sectors such as financials. For many, being a value investor has therefore meant taking on commodity risk or interest rate risk.

Recently, however, value has proliferated beyond just a few deep cyclical sectors to across the broad market. For example, value is just as cheap today within pharmaceuticals and biotechs as it is within financials and energy, as shown in the chart below.

The long-term trends for pharma and biotechs are encouraging given the ageing world population and increased wealth in emerging markets. Regulatory reform and drug pricing are clouds hanging over the industry but will not impact all companies in the same way. The best way to deal with a tough price environment is to innovate. We are invested in companies working on drugs for immune-oncology, gene therapy and Alzheimer’s which have huge potential. Current concern and uncertainty is allowing us to buy new stocks at what we believe to be a discount, and this is where the advantage of having a long-term horizon and patience comes in.

Long term view helps pick a bargain

Uncertainty is a fact of life and the road ahead is rarely obvious. One way to deal with uncertainty is taking a longer-term investment horizon. Many of the macro and political variables that drive markets in the short term are unforecastable with any reliable degree of certainty. However, long term valuations move reliably through cycles, as do economic variables like commodity prices and interest rates. Quantifying the potential impact of different scenarios on each of our holdings’ prospects and earnings and contrasting them with the company’s valuation allows us to judge whether we have identified a value bargain.

 

Peter Wilmshurst is Portfolio Manager of Templeton Global Growth Fund Ltd (ASX:TGG) plus a number of Templeton Global Equity Group's global portfolios. This article is general information and does not consider the needs of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Inflation: friend or foe of Value stocks in 2022?

The growth outperformance myth

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.