Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 655

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026

The Strait of Hormuz has been described as the world’s most critical energy artery, but in February 2026, that artery was effectively severed. As conflict between the US and Iran escalated, the closure of this passage didn’t simply spike the price of oil — it broke the global supply chain for refined products in ways that have no modern parallel, not even the 2022 Ukraine crisis.

2022 vs 2026

The 2022 Ukraine energy crisis was severe, but its oil impact was one of trade redirection, not physical destruction. While the International Energy Agency (IEA) initially forecast that 3 thousand barrels per day (mbpd) would be removed from global markets, the actual production reduction was smaller - Russian oil was diverted to new buyers in Asia and Turkey, often at a significant discount to bypass Western sanctions. Refineries outside Russia ran flat out to capture soaring margins. The system strained but did not break.

The 2026 Iran energy crisis is categorically different. The Strait blockade has physically trapped an estimated 14 to 15 mbpd of crude - roughly five times the peak disruption of the Ukraine crisis. Unlike 2022, however, the market entered this conflict with high global crude inventories, providing an initial buffer. Several emergency mechanisms have since cushioned the impact further. The IEA coordinated a record 400 million barrel strategic reserve release - more than double the 2022 response - delivering approximately 2 mbpd to the market. Saudi Arabia ramped its Petroline pipeline from 3 mbpd to its 7 mbpd ceiling, generating approximately 4 mbpd of incremental exports, while the UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (ADCOP) lifted an estimated 0.4 mbpd above pre-war throughput. Together these factors have prevented the crude price spiralling out of control, even as roughly half the total Hormuz shortfall remains unmet.


Sources: IEA OMR March 2026; S&P Global; EIA; Rystad Energy.

The refined product problem

The crude market has partial buffers. The refined product market has none. The Strait carries about 5 to 6 mbpd of refined products – petrol, diesel, and jet fuel – representing roughly 19% of all global seaborne trade in finished fuels. Unlike crude, there is no pipeline or alternative route through which these products can bypass the chokepoint.

The disruption does not stop there. Of the 14–15 mbpd of Gulf crude normally transiting the Strait, approximately 80% flows to Asian refineries. That feedstock loss is now spreading rapidly across the region in the form of refinery run cuts. In China, Sinopec has cut throughput by more than 10% while smaller teapot refiners have lost access to nearly 1.4 mbpd of Iranian crude imports. In Singapore, ExxonMobil’s Jurong Island operations have been cut to 50% or lower and Singapore Refining Co has reduced runs to 60%. Accounting for the full extent of cuts across Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and smaller regional refiners, Wood Mackenzie estimates the total Asian run cut at 4 to 5 mbpd. Combined with the direct loss of Gulf refined product exports, the total shortfall reaches 9 to 11 mbpd — far exceeding anything the crude offsets can address.


Sources: IEA OMR March 2026; Wood Mackenzie. Approximate.

The result is a refined product market under a degree of stress that makes the 2022 Ukraine crisis look mild by comparison. The crude price is below its 2022 peak while every refined product price is well above it.


Sources: Reuters/EIA; LSEG; Wood Mackenzie. 2026 figures as of mid-March 2026.

The jet fuel crack spread at $52.10 per barrel — nearly double its 2022 peak — is forcing airlines to respond. Qantas has raised international fares by approximately 5% and warned that some routes may become uneconomical if prices remain elevated. Air New Zealand has cancelled approximately 5% of its schedule through early May.

The aviation impact is just one dimension of Australia’s broader economic exposure. The country imports roughly 90% of its liquid fuel as refined product from Asian refining hubs — South Korea accounts for 32% of imports, with Singapore (23%) and Malaysia (23%) making up most of the remainder. While direct Gulf imports are negligible, approximately 59% of the collective crude intake for Australia’s top suppliers transits the Strait. Australia does not import Gulf fuel directly, but the Asian refineries providing its supply are critically dependent on that Middle Eastern feedstock.

Australia’s two remaining domestic refineries — Ampol’s Lytton in Brisbane and Viva Energy’s Geelong facility — provide a partial buffer, sourcing crude primarily from Southeast Asia and Africa, but they meet less than 20% of national consumption. With Asian refiners cutting runs and China and Thailand suspending fuel export contracts, competition for available refined product is intensifying rapidly. Australia’s 29 days of petrol reserves and 25 days of diesel provide a buffer — but one that is rapidly depleting as international supply lines tighten.

Conclusion

The global refined product supply chain is only as resilient as its narrowest physical chokepoint. Where 2022 was a price shock the market absorbed through trade redirection, 2026 is a physical blockade compounded by infrastructure destruction and a regional ‘feedstock famine’.

The crude oil market has been partially protected by the policy tools available to governments and the IEA — reserve releases, pipeline diversions, emergency output increases. These mechanisms, while imperfect, have provided a meaningful buffer for global crude benchmarks. For refined products, no such safety net exists. The finished fuel that used to flow through the Strait cannot be rerouted or replaced from alternative sources. Until the Strait reopens, the world remains in a structural fuel deficit and no policy tool currently deployed can change that.

 

Jason Teh is a Portfolio Manager at Clime Investment Management Limited, a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only. The author has not taken into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person (and is current as at the date of publishing).

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

  •   25 March 2026
  • 29
  •      
  •   
29 Comments
Robert G
March 26, 2026

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026.
Indeed. Aided and abetted by both major political parties here in Oz,
As a result of shutting down all but two of our refineries, ( 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2021 ) we became almost totally dependent on overseas supply.
I wrote to the relevant minister voicing my concerns about our lack of fuel security in 2019 and received a reply from the then Assistant Acting Secretary - Energy Security Branch.
As a member of the International Energy Agency, Australia was required to hold 90 days supply of fuel.
It had become non-compliant in 2012, 7 years earlier.
In 2019 the government was "developing a plan" to become compliant again, 7 years later, in 2026, which is now,
This "plan" was to include stock on hand, on order, on a boat or held somewhere offshore.
Which is also where we are now.
We have gone from "just in case" to just in time" or maybe "just too late".

19
Rob
March 26, 2026

How many of the closed refineries have unused but usable, storage would be a good question. I recall being told years ago that Mobil's SA refinery was in "moth balls" officially but unofficially, the real reason was massive site rectification costs ie pollution! That would be my first audit - unused storage across the country

Robert G
March 26, 2026

The Port Stanvac refinery in SA was mothballed in 2003 and closed permanently in 2009.

1
Robert G
March 27, 2026

Have just done a bit more digging.
Apparently, as at 15 March, of the 32 member nations of the IEA, Australia was the only one that didn't hold the minimum requirement of 90 days fuel supply.

1
L F
March 27, 2026

And now Port Stanvac is being sold off for housing so there is no future site to offload crude oil

James#
March 28, 2026

Looks like the woke, ideological clean energy wet dream is about to confront reality, physics and real economics here on Fantasy Island! Energy security, prosperity, resilience and national security should always trump dubious UN emissions reduction targets. Hard times need hard people prepared to make hard decisions, not woke ideologues.

10
I Tanner
March 30, 2026

Indeed ! I note they are not bombing wind turbines and solar farms.

2
James#
March 30, 2026

Unsurprisingly! You can't damage the world economy, threaten food security and hold the world to ransom, by stopping the export of wind and solar energy. Nice regime that they are in Iran, they have however threatened to take out the UAE's desalination plants that the region depends on to survive.

I guess too we don't need all the other things that come from hydrocarbons and petrochemicals including plastics, fertilisers, fabrics and pharmaceuticals to name a few!

Just think what Iran could do with nuclear weapons. They're zealously, ideologically crazy enough to use them on Israel, despite the collateral damage to Gaza and Lebanon. But then Israel would preemptively strike Iran with a nuclear weapon to prevent this. Better?

4
BeenThere B4
March 26, 2026

In 2019 the then Dept of Environment & Energy, Australia published an Interim Report of Liquid Fuel Security Review. This was "buried" (contained inconvenient parlous liquid fuels situation) and there was no Final Report.

With some link to CoAG, there is also a National Oil Supplies Emergency Committee (NOSEC) that went into hibernation.

So fuel shortage is not a new problem.
IMHO politicians of both hues have been economical with the truth!

5
Steve
March 26, 2026

The bizarre thing is how could increasing our fuel reserves be a bad thing politically? What has held successive governments back from meeting the 90 day requirement? Now Labor (Greens) can probably be expected to not want more of that nasty fossil fuel, but it wouldn't lose them any votes, so why not "do the right thing"? Of course it will be very interesting to see if Albos mob start to address this when the situation does eventually come to a resolution (ditto for fertilizer and anything else that's essential). Can we see Bowen arguing for MORE fossil fuel storage? I think Iran will become a Hindu country before that ever happens!

3
john
March 27, 2026

Following is from The Conversation

Relatively cheap, widely available renewable energy technology means not only governments but also companies and individuals can reduce their own reliance on fossil fuels, permanently.

Compared to what we get from fossil fuels, renewable energy is clean, cheap and reliable.
Solar and wind can provide virtually unlimited energy without greenhouse emissions. They also eliminate smog, strip mining, gas fracking, oil spills and oil-related warfare – not to mention avoiding the radioactive waste, accidents and weapons proliferation that go hand in hand with nuclear power.

Renewables have low requirements for raw materials, land and water. Waste from solar farms is about 1,000 times smaller than the avoided carbon dioxide from burning equivalent fossil fuels.
These technologies also come out ahead on price. Solar and wind have provided virtually all new power plant capacity in Australia over the past decade.

At a global level, solar and wind are being installed five times faster than everything else combined. This is compelling market-based evidence of their low cost.
The reliability test also favours renewables. In recent years, Australia’s shaky fleet of ageing coal power stations has become a substantial threat to grid stability. In contrast, solar and wind are very predictable, because thousands of collectors spread over a million square kilometres greatly reduces the impact of collector malfunctions and local weather.

An electric truck charging
Electric vehicles are making inroads for consumers and also heavy industry. Netze / Unsplash
Energy from solar and wind can be stored and released on demand via batteries and pumped hydro projects such as Snowy 2.0.
Consumer electric vehicles are also taking off, and heavy transport is not far behind. In China, electric truck sales have reached parity with diesel trucks. In Australia, major companies such as Fortescue are on track to drastically cut their emissions.

4
Dudley
March 27, 2026


Without storage, PV produces most when needed least and does not produce when needed most.

Hard to justifying battery storage even when "3 free hours of electricity up to 24kWh/d".
To store $7.20 / day.
Hard to find an installer to install battery storage only.


2
john
March 29, 2026

Dunno about that. Middle of the day often hot with blazing sun, lot of air-cons going plus offices, factories etc churning away

1
Dudley
March 29, 2026


"Middle of the day often hot with blazing sun, lot of air-cons going plus offices, factories etc churning away":

Yes. In primarily cooling regions, PV reduces demand on grid summer midday.
Offsetting household production numbers elusive.
( My 1kWe 4kW heat air conditioner adequately cools several day and night rooms. )

In heating regions, PV most needed around sunrise to 9AM and 6PM to 9PM to run heating air conditioners.
PV production at smallest in Winter.
https://www.synergy.net.au/-/media/Images/Blog-images/Duck-curve-2025.jpg
( My air conditioner insufficient, add resistive heating in day rooms )

PV might save me $500 / y after considering depreciation and a reasonable return on capital.
Better off improving my investment returns.

2
Steve
March 28, 2026

You really seem the perfect Labor/Green voter. Do you see ANY problems with the statements above? Do you even think to question them and how they gel with what your own eyes might observe? Renewables have low requirements for land? Really? Reliable - yes, sometimes (kind of an oxymoron to be reliable only occasionally don't you think; that's actually more the definition of unreliable). Wind, solar are not reliable (well solar reliably stops every evening) which is why they need roughly triple the nominal installed capacity to allow for non-contribution. "These technologies come out ahead on price" - if you ignore the essential need to pay for back-up power generation when the renewables are not being reliable. The only reason coal fired stations are dodgy is that they have been on the "to be closed" list for ages - would you put new tyres on a car you plan to scrap soon? And then the govt realises the almighty mess we'd be in if they did actually close so they get an "extension". But be absolutely certain, they are not going anywhere, there's nothing to replace them. OK yes, the sun is free, as is the wind. But guess what, so is the gas & coal - its there in the ground already. Oh, there's a cost to actually using it to get electricity but the same goes for wind & solar. If you look at the total cost, which includes transmission lines etc you can see bills have gone up, not down. If the market was so compelling, why so many government subsidies? Electric truck charging - have you been outside the inner city? We have long highways and many have diesel powered charging stations (a bit ironic). Yes, there are some fabulous things about the renewable world, but out there in the real world we can't just pretend the shortcomings don't exist or are just a slight inconvenience - they are 100% showstoppers - you cannot replace diesel for farming, mining, most transport (electric line for trains stops at Lithgow in NSW, west of that you're all diesel), all your imported solar panels and EV's come on diesel powered ships, natural gas is used to make fertilizer which we NEED for food production. And even for those few with EV's if you charge overnight at home the overwhelming majority of the electricity is from coal & gas. Solar only good in the day, but if your cars at work, you're not charging it more often than not. 65% of electricity in the last year was from coal & gas - in the evening when the solar contribution totally stops, it is even higher. I think you should question virtually anything published by certain outlets; they have an agenda and facts and evidence are not part of it. Sorry if this sounds a bit narky but really, to simply regurgitate such falsehoods and show virtually zero intellectual rigour is to me quite offensive to thinking people. Just open your eyes for crying out loud.

15
Dudley
March 28, 2026


"Just open your eyes for crying out loud.":

Thinking helps.

To be 'fair', john did not offer his thoughts, just quoted:
john March 27, 2026 'Following is from The Conversation'

Possibly exasperated with 'The Conversation' propaganda.

Paragraphing is free.

5
Steve
March 28, 2026

Yes Dudley I did think that after I posted but there was nothing to say John agreed or disagreed with the article, so I presumed regurgitating it without any caveat implied an alignment of views. Just one of those hot button topics and the drivel from the Conversation article is one of the reasons we are in this mess - too many people actually believe what they read from so-called journalists. Apologies if I have gotten it wrong.

2
Dudley
March 28, 2026


"The Conversation article":

A day-dream world where all the investing and building has been done and dusted.

When intermittent resources have been heavily exploited will there be less fighting over the choicest locations compared to oil?

Claudia
March 29, 2026

Except of course all that renewable stuff (wind turbines, solar panels and battery) will fall onto a screaming heap if Chine ever doesn't like something that Australia does or says and stops selling the stuff to us. Particularly given that all the renewable generation stuff only last about 10 years. Further, claims that renewables need limited land and carbon driven inputs is, in m opinion another incorrect claim probably made by city people that haven't seen fast amounts of rainforests chopped down and agricultural land taken over to wind and solar farms.

1
john
March 26, 2026

Of course the world would not be in this situation if such as Harris was elected instead of trump

3
Steve
March 26, 2026

All I can say is that we can only control what we can control. We have zero influence on overseas elections; we have total control of our own resource sector - where and when we extract and where and how we process/refine/store. We cannot blame the rest of the world for problems of our own making. We are on a large island and anything can be cut off. What if China invades Taiwan - could our fuel imports be cut off if we side with Taiwan/US? Its not that hard to look ahead and plan for various contingencies. With our vast army of public servants you would think we would have all our bases well and truly covered. Just look at the table of countries that DO have 90 days or more fuel supply - the government would have you think our pitiful 30 days is quite normal. BS. And again, we're a damn island!

16
GrumpyOldMan
April 06, 2026

Not just our fuel imports at risk from China. Those renewables may be even worse. Output from an AI search on this:
"Chinese solar inverters often communicate with servers hosted in China for monitoring, and experts have expressed concern regarding the potential for remote shutdown capabilities. Reports have surfaced about “rogue” or undocumented communication devices found in Chinese-made inverters that could bypass firewalls, theoretically allowing for remote manipulation or disconnection of power grids."
Potential immediate shut down if Emperor Xi is displeased.

B
March 30, 2026

shortsighted comment, john
we'd be in a slightly different situation = held ransom by an Islamic Republic of Iran armed with nuclear weapons, bent on destroying the 'Decadent West'. Obama's 'Iran Deal' that Harris would have inherited unquestioningly (like Biden did) was never a real solution to Iran’s Nuclear Program. Appeasement never works, it just passes the buck.
World politics also changes nothing regarding Australia's energy dependency on overseas (which is all oceans away from our geography) and unpreparedness for fuel emergencies, be they caused by a war or a natural disaster or a pandemic or some other unforeseeable Event X. The situation is a complete joke for a country as energy rich as Australia. Our government's dream of decarbonising our economy with solar and wind has just received a reality check. But of course, knowing Australia, nobody will do anything about our fuel situation - as soon as we've weathered this crisis something else will hold our 8 second attention span.

5
Aro
March 29, 2026

Leaving aside what should have been done, the question is what can be done today and tomorrow to help with the situation we are in.
Even if we had the 90 days worth of oil in storage it would be useless unless we had the refining capacity to process the oil. So in addition to storage capacity we also need refining capacity.
Now comes the hard part , how much extra are we willing to pay to have this safeguard in fuel supply?
Will we be dependent on oil/gas as much in 10 to 20 years time?
These oil shocks seem to come every 5 to 10 years, the costs to the country are not known or have not been revealed.

2
Lyn
March 29, 2026

Aro, your question, how much extra willing to pay?
I am so tired of hearing we are at risk in times of emergency whether it's oil, electricity/wind/solar, difficulty for farmers maintaining food supplies in crises, lack of submarines, naval ships, fighter aircraft or undermanned forces, all renders us incapacitated if need to defend ourselves that I'd be willing to pay a special 'Defence' levy on income to encompass all of above to be fixed, to make us self-dependent & safe so noone can circle our shores. But whom to trust to administer as no recent Govt has managed to. Perhaps a respected General to come out of retirement or about to retire with intimate experience of how to get a multitude of different things done in parallel and quickly?

1
john
March 27, 2026

Compared to what we get from fossil fuels, renewable energy is clean, cheap and reliable.
Solar and wind can provide virtually unlimited energy without greenhouse emissions. They also eliminate smog, strip mining, gas fracking, oil spills and oil-related warfare – not to mention avoiding the radioactive waste, accidents and weapons proliferation

1
Michael2
April 02, 2026

not too much interest in this comment John, which concerns me since this group are investors, have the money etc.

john
March 26, 2026

Look at this very interesting description relating to what we get from fossil fuels, versus renewable energy
https://theconversation.com/oil-reserves-last-for-weeks-solar-panels-last-for-decades-278895

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why an extended US-Iran war will punish mortgage holders

Does increasing geopolitical risk lead to higher equity market returns?

Concerns about China's rise to power seem overblown

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Indexation implications – key changes to 2026/27 super thresholds

Stay on top of the latest changes to superannuation rates and thresholds for 2026, including increases to transfer balance cap, concessional contributions cap, and non-concessional contributions cap.

Has Australia wasted the last 30 years?

The 20 years after Peter Costello left Treasury have been deemed wasted...by Peter Costello. The missed opportunities for Australia began long before.  

Super is catching up, but ageing is a triple-threat

An ageing Australia is shifting the superannuation system’s focus from accumulation to the lifecycle of retirement. While these pressures have been anticipated for decades, they are now converging at scale and driving widespread industry change.

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026

The Strait of Hormuz closure due to US-Iran conflict severely disrupted global energy supply chains. While various emergency measures mitigated the crude impact, the refined product market faces unprecedented stress.

3 ways to defuse intergenerational anger

With the upcoming budget increasingly likely to include bold proposals to alter the tax code I’ve outlined three incremental steps with fewer unintended consequences.

Navigating the next stage of life in retirement

Retirement planning is more than just saving enough money. Long-term care needs, housing choices, and social networks are just as critical for a happy and enjoyable life.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

War can’t be good, can it?

War brings immense human suffering and geopolitical chaos, but historically, equity markets have shown a certain detachment and resilience amid conflict, leading to increased profitability despite initial panic.

Property

Origins of the mislabeled capital gains tax ‘discount’

Debate over the CGT discount is intensifying amid concerns about intergenerational equity and housing affordability. This analysis shows that the 'discount' does not necessarily favor property investors.

Superannuation

Div 296 may mean your estate pays tax on assets your beneficiaries never receive

The new super tax, applying from 1 July, introduces more than just a higher rate on large balances. It brings into focus a misalignment between where wealth sits and where the tax on that wealth ultimately falls.

Investment strategies

There’s more to software than just code

AI-driven fears of collapsing software moats has triggered indiscriminate sell-offs. This has created mispricing opportunities as markets overreact to uncertainty and rising discount rates.

Economics

Europe: A new growth trajectory powered by reform and investment

Europe is undergoing a major transformation driven by security threats, US pressure, and a shift from austerity to growth. EU member states are taking proactive measures to enhance competitiveness and resilience.

Investment strategies

Orbital AI data centers prepare for launch

The new space race is driven by AI as data centers in space offer continuous solar power and reduced environmental impact. Orbital AI aims to speed data processing and ease Earth's resource strains.

Retirement

Little‑known government scheme can help retirees tap into $3 trillion of housing wealth

The Home Equity Access Scheme in Australia allows older homeowners to tap into their home equity for retirement income, yet remains underused due to lack of awareness and its perceived complexity.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.