Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 403

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 403

  •   15 April 2021
  • 8
  •      
  •   

Most Australians hold their superannuation in a balanced fund, often 60% growth/40% defensive or 70%/30%. Lifecycle funds are also popular, where the amount in defensive assets increases with age. Employees who are not engaged with their super (and that's most people when they start full-time work) simply tick a box for the default fund selected on their behalf by the employer.

For example, UniSuper, the fund for the higher education sector with 450,000 members holding $90 billion, says:

"Our Balanced investment option returned almost 6% in 2020. This is an important result because it’s our default investment option and most of our members invest in it."

Of course, 2020 was no ordinary year, and UniSuper also reports:

"The difference between our best- and worst-performing investment options was about 60%. The reason for this is that our best performer, the Global Environmental Opportunities option, focuses on technology and decarbonisation. Our worst performer, the Listed Property option, is heavily invested in shopping centres, which have suffered during the pandemic."

What an amazing difference for simply ticking the correct box in an application form from a major superannuation institution. That 60% variation in money to live on can make a massive difference in retirement standards, and it shows the importance of asset allocation and fund selection.

Here is the strategic asset allocation of the UniSuper Balanced option.

It is common for a balanced option to hold 30% to 50% in cash and fixed interest, but with high-quality bonds and term deposits earning 1% or less, the composition of the 'defensive' assets increasingly varies between funds. We have previously discussed how Hostplus uses infrastructure assets rather than bonds in its defensive allocation.

Take another example, Vanguard's Diversified Balanced ETF. Sounds perfect for superannuation, as 'diversified and balanced' is a recommended long-term savings strategy. This is more a 50/50 fund and gains its exposure by investing in the following Vanguard sector ETFs.

It's a solid retirement solution for many people, but let's delve deeper into the Global Aggregate Bond Index Fund, typical of where many super funds hold their fixed interest allocation:

Number of issuers: 2,488, average credit quality AA-
Number of holdings: 9,795 (That's what you call diversification. Negligible credit exposure to any one name, absolutely rock solid credit risk).
Yield to maturity: 0.92%
Effective duration: 7.5 years
Weighted average maturity: 9.2 years

With a duration of 7.5, if interest rates rose 1% across the rate curve, the bond fund would lose 7.5%. Or make 7.5% if rates fell 1%. Investors should know that a 1% rate move could wipe out 8 years of 0.92%. How many people in such a balanced fund realise half their allocation is earning less than 1%?

This is not a criticism of the product. It is typical and a reflection of current market circumstances. Anyone who wants returns needs to take risk.

Elsewhere, Colonial First State (CFS) offers lifecycle funds rather than a single balanced fund, and here are the five asset allocations in their FirstChoice Employer Super or Commonwealth Essential Super. More defensive assets with age.

At the moment at CFS, the defensive allocation for the older cohorts is a mix of multi asset, alternatives, credit, emerging markets debt, and ‘total return’ fixed interest in addition to regular duration Australian bonds plus cash. It's worth checking with your super fund what is in the defensive bucket.

This edition focusses on the asset allocation problem we all face, especially bonds versus equities. Many people use the rule-of-thumb of 'your age in bonds'. That is, at age of 70, hold 70% in bonds. But low interest rates means income is insufficient for the lifestyle many retirees want, and hence the debate about spending capital that Firstlinks has covered in detail. The challenge is to find assets that deliver returns with acceptable risk, or adopt other strategies such as working longer or part-time.

The Reserve Bank's Head of Financial Stability, Jonathan Kearns admitted a few weeks ago that the values of all investments are vulnerable to a rise in interest rates, and bonds may not provide the traditional hedge for other parts of a portfolio:

"Because risk-free sovereign rates effectively underpin the pricing of all sorts of assets, if you have a rise in yields because of risk premia then that can affect the pricing of a broad range of assets simultaneously. Investors who thought they perhaps had a hedge through owning bonds and equities can find that all of their assets fall simultaneously and then that can have negative feedback for the economy through wealth effects.”

Three articles this week focus on the allocation issue, but first up, Ross Clare of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) says that contrary to the claims of the Retirement Income Review, the vast majority of Australians die with little or no superannuation. The issue of whether they spend their super or pass it to their kids is not relevant for most people.

Then Brad Dunn looks at how an investor might achieve 5% in the current market, showing how asset allocations have changed over time to reach this income level. One way a portfolio can boost income without stockmarket risk is in bank hybrids, and Campbell Dawson describes the extraordinary movements in this sector in the last 12 months.

With the last 12 months delivering the biggest difference between world equity and world bond returns for at least 50 years, Daniel Morris says investors are faced with a decision to rebalance if they are now overweight equities. It's not an easy decision as equities continue to run strongly and bond rates are so low, but by definition, rebalancing forces investors away from previous winners.

Then Craig Stanford shows how correlations between bonds and equities have changed. On the surface, falling sharemarkets suggest slower economic growth and lower interest rates (rising bond prices), such that bonds and equities should be negatively correlated. But where are we in these strange markets?

Obviously, no silver bullets for portfolio construction here, but this collection of articles at least gives you information to help your personal decision.

Moving on to other topics ...

It's hard to ignore the second-largest economy in the world and Australia's largest trading partner, and Martin Lau reveals five trends in China which are influencing his investing.

Then Lawrence Lam offers eight observations about selling shares, saying we focus too much on the buying decision. My favourite is the insight that when it comes to selling, consider why you bought the share in the first place and whether anything has materially changed, or are you just reacting to a short-term market.

In this week's White Paper, Franklin Templeton reflects on predictions of above-average economic growth, record fiscal and monetary stimulus and increased likelihood of inflation and says we are in an economic environment never seen before.

And check the latest BetaShares prediction on ETFs linked here as the sector officially exceeds assets of $100 billion.

For our Comment of the Week, I always enjoy the quality of the feedback we receive. They really are worth checking, especially those on last week's piece by Jon Kalkman which has received over 7,000 views.

Here is one from Peter Henery on Hugh Dive's article on residential property:

"As a long term resi prop investor I salute your analysis. Very few 'get it '....but you did pretty well. Here's what you missed! (1) You cannot save your way to wealth. You must use OPM (aka Other People's Money or leverage.) Name me one other asset where the banks 'fall over themselves' to lend you 80% LVR? (90%+ with LMI) And so long as you service the loan, won't make a margin call if the value falls! (2) Now work out the IRR when you only have 10-20% skin in the game and property rises just 3% per year. And that happens year after year and nobody bliks an eyelid! When we have a 'boom' year, the returns should be illegal! (3) Next, all the banks and all the gov't are 'in on the bet' and they are on your side. Just take VIC gov't income. Mostly land tax and stamp duty. Do they want property to keep going? What makes up the banks balance sheets? Do they want it to 'keep going'? The only game in town for dumb old Aussie battlers."

Peter is right about the leverage, but it's also the forced saving and compounding over decades which has made 'Aussie battlers' wealthy.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

A full PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles will be loaded into this editorial on our website by midday.

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Australian ETF Review from BetaShares

Indicative Listed Investment Company (LIC) NTA Report from Bell Potter

Monthly Investment Products update from ASX

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

8 Comments
Steve
April 18, 2021

One of the best deals at the moment for young super fund members is the dirt cheap CFS WS Personal Super at only 0.2% flat pa admin fees, no cash account, and with a mix of Bennelong Australian Shares & T Rowe Price International Shares, also with some listed property for a bit more diversity. That will thrash any balanced or Life Cycle industry fund hands down. Lowest fee, highest return long term.

Mike West
April 19, 2021

Having been a financial planner , I note most punters don't add in the other investment fees ( oh its only 0.2%) . Looking at the " admin fee " is a trick , ie look at the other management /investment/ buy /sell fees / property borrowing fees . Some will surprise !!!! Look at the prospectus and fine print .Even the industry super funds are now around 1% p.a , not to mention the increases of 30% on the income protection insurance rates just this year for some last time I looked .

Brandon
April 19, 2021

Definitely worth considering investment costs into the equation. Both bennelong and T-Rowe have nearly a 1% management fee on top of the 0.20% admin fee vs CFS index options that have a 0.15% management fee plus the admin, taking it to 0.35%. Comparatively, the index will provide a more stable long term investment but will not sacrifice performance.

Where we can not guarantee performance, we can guarantee costs (mostly). I know that at the end of the day, regardless if active outperforms index, I am still saving almost 1% difference in fees. But ofcourse there is also a point where performance outweighs costs and vice versa.

Gary M
April 21, 2021

Hi Steve, that cost you quote does not include investment management fees of the managers you mention.

Ian
April 15, 2021

Totally agree with that view (Richard's) however, it also depends on the sum of money involved.
Holding 60-80% of $2 million plus is indeed madness, and is foregoing huge potential returns over a couple of decades, however, if the sum is smaller, say less than $500,000 there is an argument to hold more in cash as any share wipeout would be more devastating to their next few years income.

Richard Brannelly
April 15, 2021

Oh Graham don't get me started on lifecycle investment solutions - they are one of my pet hates in superannuation! They are purely a post-GFC measure to mitigate trustee risk at the complete and utter expense of their members long-term needs and financial security. Why oh why should a 60-year old with an average life expectancy (& investment timeframe) of 25 years or more - and just at the time in their life when they have the most capital to benefit from compound returns - have 60-80% of their retirement nest-egg moved to an asset class like cash and/or bonds??? Insanity barely adequately describes this thinking. I wonder how many super trustees would be happy with this for themselves personally at age 60?
By all means when 2-3 years from the planned retirement date progressively move a couple of years worth of retirement income into cash to provide short-term income security - but 60-80% of the whole pie - madness!

Carikku
April 15, 2021

Richard I agree whole-heartedly.

Brandon
April 19, 2021

Frequent reply i get on the topic. But what if the market drops? Mate unless it talks the market 15 years to recover, you don't need to worry about defensive assets. Historically it is 5 years or less, which means you don't need to hold more than 5 yrs of your pension in defensive. Your short term needs are protected and the remainder of your funds are still invested in growth, prolonging your retirement funds. For a young investors like myself, the difference between having 30 to 40% of my super in fixed interest in a stage of life fund vs 100% in growth long before retirement age has significant ramifications. With a 30+ yr timeframe it's the difference of living half of my retiremntt with the age pension or dieing with more money then I first retired with.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The risk-return tradeoff: What’s the right asset mix for a 5% return?

Conservative investors are forced to choose between protecting capital and accepting lower income while drawing down capital to maintain living standards or taking additional risk. How can you strike a balance?

How long will my retirement savings last?

Many self-funded retirees will outlive their savings as most men and women now aged 65 will survive at least another 20 years. Compare your spending with how much you earn to see how long your money will last.

Buffett's favourite indicator versus all-in equities

Peter Thornhill shows how his personal portfolio has thrived under an 'all-in equities' strategy, but Warren Buffett's favourite valuation indicator says stock markets are priced at their most extreme ever.

In fact, most people have no super when they die

Contrary to the popular belief supported by the 'fact base' of the Retirement Income Review, four in every five Australians aged 60 and over have no super in the period up to four years before their death.

Five timeless lessons from a life in investing

40 years of investing is distilled into five crucial lessons. An overall theme is to embrace uncertainty to make an impact on how much you earn, how much you spend, how much you save and how much risk you take.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 403

Most Australians hold their superannuation in a balanced fund, often 60% growth/40% defensive or 70%/30%. Lifecycle funds are also popular, where the amount in defensive assets increases with age. Employees who are not engaged with their super (and that's most people when they start full-time work) simply tick a box for the default fund selected on their behalf by their employer. Are these funds still appropriate?

  • 15 April 2021

Latest Updates

Property

Whoyagonnacall? 10 unspoken risks buying off-the-plan

All new apartment buildings have defects, and inexperienced owners assume someone else will fix them. But developers and builders will not volunteer to spend time and money unless someone fights them. Part 1

Superannuation

Super changes, the Budget and 2021 versus 2022

Josh Frydenberg's third budget contained changes to superannuation and other rules but their effective date is expected to be 1 July 2022. Take care not to confuse them with changes due on 1 July 2021.

Economy

Why don't higher prices translate into inflation? Blame hedonism

Why are prices rising but not the CPI? When we measure inflation, we aren’t measuring raw price changes, we’re measuring the pleasure-adjusted or utility-adjusted price changes, and we use it incorrectly.

Economy

Should investors brace for uncomfortably high inflation?

The global recession came quickly and deeply but it has given way to a strong rebound. What are the lessons for investors, how should a portfolio change and what role will inflation play?

Risk management

Revealed: Madoff so close to embezzling Australian investors

We are publishing this anonymously knowing it comes from an impeccable source. Bernie Madoff’s fund was almost distributed to retail Australian investors a year before the largest-ever hedge fund fraud was exposed.

Exchange traded products

How long can your LICs continue to pay dividends?

Some LICs have recently paid out more in dividends than their net profit as they have the ability to tap their retained profits and reserves. Others reduced dividends to ease the burden on cashflow and balance sheets.

SMSF strategies

How SMSF contribution reserving can use the higher caps

With the increase in the concessional cap to $27,500 on 1 July 2021, a contribution reserving strategy could allow a member to make and claim deductions for personal contributions of up to $52,500 this year.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.