Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 633

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Often described as the 'cardigan and slippers' of the investment world, bonds are perceived by some as conservative or unremarkable. In practice, fixed income serves as one of the most versatile and vital building blocks of portfolio construction, contributing income, diversification, and resilience across market cycles.

The asset class is notable for its breadth. Investors can access government, corporate, and securitised markets across regions and sectors, each offering distinct risk and return characteristics. This variety allows fixed income to complement equities and alternatives while contributing to risk reduction and income generation.

Despite these strengths, bonds are often overlooked by individual investors. The fixed income market is large and complex, with less transparency and liquidity than equities, making direct access more challenging. Extended periods of low yields and the media’s emphasis on equity markets have also contributed to perceptions of limited appeal. However, current yield levels and evolving market dynamics have reinforced the critical role that fixed income can play in portfolio construction.

The traditional 60/40 equity and bond allocation has long been considered a benchmark for balanced investing. The challenges of 2022, however, underscored the importance of re-examining this framework. Investors should carefully assess both the composition and scale of their fixed income and equity allocations, while also considering complementary exposures such as gold, real estate, or commodities to strengthen diversification. Importantly, these developments have not diminished the relevance of fixed income but rather highlighted the need for a more thoughtful application of the asset class.

Across environments, fixed income demonstrates its versatility. When interest rates decline, longer-duration bonds can deliver meaningful capital appreciation. In periods of rising rates, shorter-duration and floating-rate instruments can help preserve capital and mitigate volatility. More broadly, bond performance is shaped by the path of growth, inflation, and monetary policy; factors that ensure fixed income remains both a source of dependable income and an effective counterbalance to equity risk.

Different types of bonds

The fixed income universe spans a broad range of instruments, including cash, government bonds, investment-grade corporates, high-yield bonds, emerging-markets debt, and structured finance such as commercial mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.

Cash serves as the ultimate source of liquidity and stability, but holding excessive balances can leave portfolios overly conservative and constrain long-term returns. Beyond cash, the major fixed income categories share certain common characteristics: they provide diversification, income, and in many cases liquidity. At the same time, they expose investors to risks such as interest rate sensitivity, credit deterioration, inflation, and in some instances, currency fluctuations.

The balance of these traits varies by sector. Government bonds are typically the most liquid and carry lower credit risk, but they remain exposed to interest rate and inflation risk. High-yield and emerging-market bonds offer higher potential returns, though with greater credit and currency volatility. Structured finance instruments can deliver differentiated exposures and yield opportunities, but often with more limited liquidity.

Crucially, no bond is entirely risk-free. Even government securities, often perceived as safe, can lose value when interest rates rise or inflation erodes real returns. This spectrum of benefits and risks underscores the versatility of fixed income and highlights the value of active management in calibrating allocations across sectors to align with evolving market conditions.

Interest rates and bonds

A defining characteristic of fixed income is its sensitivity to interest rates. Because bonds pay fixed coupons, their prices move inversely with prevailing yields: when rates decline, existing bonds with higher coupons become more valuable, and when rates rise, their prices fall. The magnitude of this effect is a function of duration, with longer-maturity bonds exhibiting greater price sensitivity.

For government bonds, which carry minimal credit risk, this relationship is generally straightforward: falling rates typically translate into higher prices. For corporate and other credit-sensitive bonds, however, the outcome is more nuanced. The reason rates are moving matters. If yields are declining due to expectations of slower growth or higher default risk, credit spreads can widen, offsetting or even reversing the positive impact of lower base rates.

Understanding this dynamic is critical for portfolio construction. Interest rates not only shape return potential across the spectrum of fixed income assets but also influence how bonds interact with equities and other asset classes in different market environments.

The outlook for bond markets

The starting point for global fixed income is more attractive today than in much of the past decade. Yields remain above their five-to-10-year averages, creating a stronger income foundation and a larger cushion against potential volatility. At the same time, credit spreads are narrower than average, suggesting limited compensation for credit risk in some segments. This highlights the importance of selectivity, particularly in areas that may be vulnerable if growth slows or inflation reaccelerates.

Regionally, the backdrop differs between developed and emerging economies. Relative growth, inflation dynamics, and policy settings appear more supportive for select emerging markets, while developed economies continue to face challenges from slower growth momentum and evolving policy responses. In the US, headwinds from trade tariffs and a softening labour market remain key risks to growth. These conditions argue for caution in higher-risk credit exposures such as high-yield debt, while reinforcing the role of quality fixed income as a stabiliser.

Final word

Fixed income has often been characterised as unexciting, but in portfolio construction, stability and predictability are valuable traits. Beyond their defensive qualities, bonds offer a wide spectrum of opportunities across sectors, maturities, and geographies. When thoughtfully combined, these exposures can provide reliable income, enhance diversification, and mitigate portfolio risk, while also offering potential for capital appreciation in shifting market environments.

The challenges of 2022 underscored the need to revisit traditional portfolio frameworks and consider a broader set of asset classes. Yet they also reaffirmed the enduring relevance of fixed income. Far from being a “boring” allocation, bonds remain a dynamic and versatile asset class, one that continues to serve as both ballast and opportunity within well-constructed portfolios.

 

Eric Souders is a director and portfolio manager at Payden & Rygel, a specialist investment manager partner of GSFM Funds Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information in this article is provided for informational purposes only. Any opinions expressed in this material reflect, as at the date of publication, the views of Payden & Rygel and should not be relied upon as the basis of your investment decisions.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

  •   15 October 2025
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Errol
October 16, 2025

I think bonds have their place in a balanced portfolio but for most people the often cited 60/40 allocation is I feel too much exposure to bonds. Recent market experience would also question whether bonds now truly move in the opposite direction to equities.

While the article clearly outlines their benefits, there have been many articles claiming “It’s Bonds Turn” over the last 5 years. That hasn’t worked too well.

3
Tony Reardon
October 16, 2025

Surely one's attitude to the appropriate mix of assets depends on age. I advise my sons to be in their fund's high growth option which I take to be minimal fixed interest whereas in our SMSF we are about 46% cash/fixed interest (we are both in our seventies).

2
Lisa Romano
October 16, 2025

It’s reassuring to read about bonds during a period of heightened excitement around gold. My 60/40 is reversed to the norm, and fixed interest forms the major part of my SMSF and also my personal investment folio. They provide stability, a regular income stream and can be sold if cash is required. Meanwhile stocks are a balance, providing an inflation hedge and dividend income. Sadly dipping my toe in US stocks directly has fallen short of expectations in the years since COVID. However I will retain what little I have in the hopes that a longer term approach may prove more successful.

1
CC
October 16, 2025

US stocks done short of expectations,
really ?? Suggest trying the index....
Bonds don't provide stability when interest rates rise as we saw in recent years, unless use FRNs

1
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Red pill or blue pill? Navigating the matrix of fixed income

Things may finally be turning for the bond market

Duration: Friend or foe in a defensive allocation?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Latest Updates

Financial planning

How much does it really cost to raise a child?

With fertility rates at a record low, many say young people aren’t having kids because they’re too expensive. Turns out, it’s not that simple and there are likely other factors at play.

Exchange traded products

Passive ETF investors may be in for a rude shock

Passive ETFs have become wildly popular just as markets, especially the US, reach extreme valuations. For long-term investors, these ETFs make sense, though if you're investing in them to chase performance, look out below.

Shares

Bank reporting season scorecard November 2025

The Big Four banks shrugged off doomsayers with their recent results, posting low loan losses, solid margins, and rising dividends. It underscores their resilience, but lofty valuations mean it’s time to be selective. 

Investment strategies

The real winners from the AI rush

AI is booming, but like the 19th-century gold rush, the real profits may go to those supplying the tools and energy, not the companies at the centre of the rush.

Economy

Why economic forecasts are rarely right (but we still need them)

Economic experts, including the RBA, get plenty of forecasts wrong, but that doesn't make such forecasts worthless. The key isn't to predict perfectly – it's to understand the range of possibilities and plan accordingly.

Strategy

13 reflections on wealth and philanthropy

Wealth keeps growing, yet few ask “how much is enough?” or what their kids truly need. After 23 years in philanthropy, I’ve seen how unexamined wealth can limit impact, and why Australia needs a stronger giving culture.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.