Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 364

Howard Marks' anatomy of an unexpected rally

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have checked the latest memos to clients written by Howard Marks, Co-Chairman of multibillion-dollar asset manager, Oaktree Capital.

Marks recalls the recovery from the 23 March low resulted in the biggest three-day gain in more than 80 years, which built into a rise of 45% by 8 June. In fact, after Marks' note was published, Wall Street closed its best quarter since 1987, so it is timely to review his anatomy of a rally.

How can the market recover when the economy is much worse than before?

Prior to the pandemic, says Marks, an all-time high had been achieved when the economy was strong and the outlook good. Yet the market has recovered close to that level when economic conditions are much worse. He lists the reasons for the optimism as:

  • Investor confidence in the Fed and Treasury to bring about an economic recovery by doing 'whatever it takes'.
  • Some improvements in the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths, especially no shortages of hospital beds and optimism on vaccines and treatments.
  • The market’s ability to look beyond the crisis, supported by improving economic statistics, to a recovery in GDP and corporate earnings in 2021.

Investors became convinced that the Fed would ensure markets continued to rise, with seemingly little concern for debt levels. The Fed did not even require strong creditworthiness in corporate bonds purchased. With ultra-low rates, the discounted present value of future cash flows rises. Low returns start to look relatively attractive, argues Marks.

He has been asking his team: can the Fed keep buying debt forever?

When bullish market moves began in late March, investors who have little regard for value, such as index funds, ETFs and other automatic traders, perpetuated whatever is set motion. Then behaviours such as FOMO replace the previous greed. He adds his voice to the impact of new retail investors:

“Retail investors are said to have contributed substantially to the stock market’s rise, and certainly to its most irrational aspects … large numbers of call options have been bought in recent days, and it was reported that small investors accounted for much of the volume. Developments like these suggest the influence of speculative fever and the absence of careful analysis. There’s a widely held theory that government benefit checks have been behind some of the retail investors’ purchases. And that makes sense: in the last three months, there’ve been no games for sports bettors to wager on, and the stock market was the only casino that was open.”

Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

He acknowledges his usual cautious approach generates many opposites to the points made above (as described in his previous memos), but it depends what weight the markets gives to each at a point in time.

How to make sense of what is happening

Marks says it is futile to expect the stock market to operate with a universally accepted and reliable way to value companies without bouts of optimism or pessimism. The market can swing quickly between ‘flawless’ and ‘hopeless’.

“But the most optimistic psychology is always applied when things are thought to be going well, compounding and exaggerating the positives, and the most depressed psychology is applied when things are going poorly, compounding the negatives. This guarantees that extreme highs and lows will always be the eventual result in cycles, not the exception.”

He appeals to a few time-honoured standards in the three stages of a rally:

  • the first stage, when only a few unusually perceptive people believe improvement is possible
  • the second stage, when most investors realise that improvement is actually taking place, and
  • the third stage, when everyone concludes everything will get better forever.

Around 23 March was the first stage, when few people focussed on economic improvement. Stage two happened quickly and we went straight to stage three. It feels to him that the market is too focused on the positives.

“I had good company in being sceptical of the May/June gains. On May 12, with the S&P 500 up a startling 28% from the March 23 low, Stan Druckenmiller, one of the greatest investors of all time, said, 'The risk-reward for equity is maybe as bad as I’ve seen in my career.' The next day, David Tepper, another investing great, said it was 'maybe the second-most overvalued stock market I’ve ever seen. I would say ’99 was more overvalued.'"

And after these two spoke, the market continued to run. So his bottom line is similar to his last few memos, that investors are not compensated for risk:

“the fundamental outlook may be positive on balance, but with listed security prices where they are, the odds aren’t in investors’ favour.”


Footnote (not from the Marks article). This chart from JP Morgan shows the rapid growth of major central bank balance sheets as they print money, and how their bond purchases have pushed down global bond rates.


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. Howard Marks is Co-Chairman of multibillion-dollar asset manager, Oaktree Capital, and here is the full text of his latest memo. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


July 06, 2020

Meanwhile, Afterpay hits $18b (yes, "b", as in 'billion') in Market cap, being the 19th largest company in the ASX, eclipsing ASX, COH, RHC, SHL, REA etc., whilst making no profit, having negative cashflow, forever raising capital and having negative return on equity.

Feels like the Gordon Gekko scene in Wall Street 2 where he says "is everyone else out there nuts ?"

July 02, 2020

If Howard and all his expert mates don't know, what hope the rest of us? Someone out there is enjoying this market.

July 02, 2020

I have been in the market since 1963 and have seen nothing like what has happened over the last 3 odd months. I realise the market normally looks approximately 9 months ahead. Do people think that in around 9 - 12 months things will be back to normal ??? Just stop and give it some real thought. I have been a follower of Howard Marks for many years as also WarrenBuffet / Charlie Munger etc i dont see them rushing into the market at the moment. Only time (and it could be a while) will tell. As a friend of mine says " keep your powder dry ".

Gary M
July 01, 2020

And NASDAQ hits an all-time high. One thing that is missed is we should no longer think about the market as one beast. It has massive winners and losers from the pandemic, and the Amazons, Apples and Googles of the world go from strength to strength. They need to be analysed in a different context.

July 05, 2020

Could the Amazons, Apples and Googles of the world form part of the next Nifty-Fifty experience?


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.