Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 406

Making a positive impact with thematic investing

Last week I read an interesting piece by someone who clearly was not a fan of thematic investing. 

He demonstrated the dangers of jumping on the ‘next big thing’, pointing out, for example, the risks early investors in the automobile faced. The Duryea Motor Wagon Company, the first U.S. car maker, was founded in 1895. Over the next 25 years, 436 car manufacturers came into existence, but 30 years later, almost all had fallen by the wayside as the big three of General Motors, Chrysler and Ford emerged.

More recently, those who committed their hard-earned cash to the online shopping phenomenon via Amazon have been rewarded handsomely, but it’s easy to forget spectacular failures such as etoys.com, Pets.com, Boo.com, which didn’t turn out so happily for investors.

The writer’s conclusion? “Thematic leaps do not axiomatically line the pockets of those willing to finance them.”

Maybe so. But does this mean we should abandon the attempt to profit from trends that have the potential to change the world? Or simply, is it that we need to be smart in how we go about it?

What is thematic investing?

Thematic investors try to identify long-term transformational trends, and the investments that are likely to benefit if those trends play out. Such investments are typically agnostic to industry sectors, or geographical boundaries.

Thematic investing focuses on structural, rather than cyclical trends. These are themes that tend to be one-off shifts that irreversibly change the world, driven by powerful forces such as disruptive technologies or changing demographics and consumer behaviour. By contrast, cyclical themes are typically short- to medium-term, and tend to revert.

An example of structural change is the emergence of e-commerce, which has fundamentally shifted the way goods and services are bought and sold. Another good example is the rise and rise of cybersecurity, which is increasingly becoming a critical threshold component of all technology solutions as more and more of our world goes online.

How can I invest thematically?

Here’s where it gets trickier.

The writer I referred to earlier is right - picking winners is notoriously difficult. For every Amazon or Netflix, there are hundreds, even thousands, of companies trying to exploit the same opportunities, but fail.

For this reason, there are benefits to gaining exposure to a theme in a different way, one that is not an ‘all or nothing’ gamble.

Thematic ETFs take this approach. They typically aim to track an index that measures the performance of a range of companies that have the potential to benefit if the theme plays out. And, like thematic investing more generally, they are typically sector and country agnostic. Diversified exposure means that the inevitable failure of some of these companies will have less of an impact. The hope is that some, or many, will succeed, and that overall the portfolio of companies will increase in value.

…. and when?

As important as the how, is the when.

One model proposes that disruptive technologies, products and ideas typically follow an ‘S’ shaped adoption curve with five stages. The chart below shows the growth, and rate of growth, at each stage.

Source: Jay Jacobs, ‘Investing in Tomorrow – A Whitepaper on Thematic Investing’, Global X

The timing of an investment is largely a trade-off between upside potential and risk.

Investing right at the start of adoption has the highest potential reward but also involves the greatest risk, as the trend is far from established, and there is a high possibility of failure.

Waiting until the later stages involves far less risk, as the theme is well-established. However, the potential rewards will also be less, as the successful progression of the theme will already be reflected in the prices of the investments being considered.

What theme might be in the sweet spot right now?

In 2021, what is a theme that fits the criterion of a ‘one-off shift that irreversibly changes the world, that is long-term in nature, and driven by powerful forces such as disruptive technologies or human behaviour’? One that is neither at the earliest stages, nor has reached maturity.

While we believe there are a few, the candidate we’re focusing on today is climate change.

Global warming is one of the defining challenges of the 21st century. Unaddressed, it will have a catastrophic impact on our planet and the lives of future generations. Many would argue the catastrophe is already unfolding.

Given the dimensions of the challenge, the size of the response and the amount of money needed to be spent on it is correspondingly large.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that to contain the rise in global temperatures to 1.5-2°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100 would require a halving in the level of greenhouse gas emissions (GGE) currently projected by 2050 under the current 2016 Paris Climate Agreement.

Energy currently accounts for around two thirds of global GGE. Global energy producer BP estimates that to achieve the extra GGE cuts suggested by the IPCC would require a 10-fold increase by 2050 in the share of energy derived from renewables - or from around 5% in 2018 to between 40 to 60%.

Meanwhile, the Energy Transitions Committee (ETC), a global organisation of energy producers, financial institutions and environmental groups, believes it is possible to create a prosperous net-zero-emissions economy by mid-century, in which case global warming would be limited to the lower bounds of the Paris Agreement’s target range.

The ETC estimates that the additional investment required to achieve a zero carbon-emissions economy by 2050 will be US$1-2 trillion per annum.

The deep cuts to emissions that will be required to limit global warming call for innovation on a range of climate and environmentally friendly activities. Investors wanting comprehensive access to this thematic are likely to want an investment that provides exposure to a broad range of solutions, including clean energy, electric vehicles, energy efficiency technologies, sustainable food, water efficiency and pollution control.

 

Richard Montgomery is the Marketing Communications Manager at BetaShares, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not address the needs of any individual. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investment value can go down as well as up.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

To tap into the long-term growth potential of this theme, BetaShares has launched the Climate Change Innovation ETF (ERTH).

 

  •   5 May 2021
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

The role of sustainability in private markets

Thematic ETFs: is the juice worth the squeeze?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.