Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 382

Perpetual: Biden impact not as important as China for Australia

For a view of the US election result and the effect on the stock markets and the economies of the US and Australia, we’re talking with:

  • Kyle Lidbury, Head of Investments Research, Perpetual Private
  • Amanda MacDonald, Investment Specialist, Perpetual Private
  • James Holt, Senior Investment Specialist, Perpetual Investments

What does a disputed election mean for the stock market?

Amanda: The biggest risk to markets is a contested result. The likelihood of increased volatility is really dependent on that scenario happening.

James: Markets like certainty. People want a decisive result – either a blue wave or red wave. If it’s a contested result, the big fear is that it will be a [year] 2000 type result which came down to one state – Florida – and went on for weeks and eventually came down to hanging chads and only a handful of votes.

Amanda: And coupled with all the other risks in the US at the moment, social unrest, the pandemic – these will all add up along with a contested result as increasing the likelihood of more volatility and bad news for the stock market at least in the short term.

James: One flip side for volatility, a positive, there may be more opportunities for active investors.

When the market has a big rally like we’ve had and there is an expected clear result with Trump and taxes stay low, or an expected clear result with Biden and he spends up – either way is a good scenario but if they don’t know which it’s going to go is negative. It’s also worth remembering there are two elections that are important today – there’s also the senate.

Kyle: With a split vote between the Presidency and the Senate could also increase uncertainty as legislation is stalled in the senate.

Would a Democrat or Republican victory be better for the stock market in 2021?

Kyle: The US stock market is pretty divergent to all markets, including the Australian market, at the moment largely to do with technology. That is one of impacts of the COVID-19 crisis, which have made real winners and losers from the crisis. Certainty around earnings for tech stocks on the US market is driving their valuations up and up, while other sectors – without that certainty of earnings – have not performed well.

One thing that is really affecting us [Australia] from a ‘future prospects’ perspective is the current state of the Australia-China relationship, which is poor. You’ve seen several industries come up against fairly hefty barriers, including copper, barley and now even lobsters. Education and tourism are also affected – both top 5 exports for our country. Our strength is iron ore, which so far has not been affected.

Together with these other industries, there’s no doubt this helped us through the GFC and why we avoided a recession. The risk of lack of Chinese support, that’s more of a headwind for us that the US election.

As a result of the US election, I don’t see there will be much change from the US perspective. The China trade war – the hemming in of China has bipartisan support and won’t really change as a result of who gets in.

James: Over the long term it doesn’t matter who is the President. For over 200 years, the country has thrived under different presidencies. In the short term, Biden might give the economy a net boost – if there’s a clear result one way or the other, the markets will move on pretty quickly.

Kyle: One thing to note is that the tech stocks have dimmer prospects under Biden. There are elements of the Democratic party that want to break up those companies.

Amanda: Generally, with less pressure from regulation [than] under a Biden presidency Tech stocks will likely continue their divergence from the rest of the market.

James: Tech stocks are pretty richly priced anyway, even before COVID; and they’ve come out of COVID-19 pretty even more so from that perspective it’s worth noting that once you get these elections out of the way things return to basic fundamental, they’re probably ripe for rotation.

Do politics really matter when it comes to stock market performance after an election?

Amanda: The year after an election the incumbent president tends to show a more positive return.

Kyle: Historically, evidence points to returns being better under a Democrat presidency – but with a split congress.

James: True - we saw that in the late 90s when Bill Clinton was President. Republicans were in control of congress and cut spending and kept tax low and Clinton was the President acting as centrist between the left-wing Democrats and the right-wing Republicans. Funnily enough if the Democrats win the Presidency and the senate stays Republican that might be the best result as businesses can take more confidence that there will be fewer changes in the law and be more confident to invest and get on with business.

Democrats and Republicans will take the US economy in different directions. What should we look for and what market sectors will benefit from a Democrat or Republican victory?

Kyle: There’s a lot that will be similar, but there are some differences. Both candidates have stated a desire to spend on infrastructure for example. However, Biden has said it will be around green initiatives such as renewables and environmental. Some stocks have rallied quite strongly on that prospect.

In terms of trade, there won’t be a significant amount of difference as we’ve talked about that.

Trump has talked a lot about bringing jobs back to America, but he’s been less successful on that than he might like to think despite the tariffs and other things. There’s a lot of data that says there was economic stimulus but it was largely through the tax cuts that were passed, but what that did was hide a contraction that you saw from the reduction in trade as a result of the trade war.

Even though the economy grew – it could have grown much more strongly if there was more harmonious trade.

James: The funny thing with the Democrats is that they’ve jumped on the trade bandwagon as well so we shouldn’t expect much difference under the Democrats – even if the Democrats are more diplomatic about it.

How will ESG investments be affected by either President?

Amanda: Biden has laid out quite a clear plan for his clean energy revolution with a net zero emissions target by 2050. As Kyle mentioned previously Biden has indicated to put $2tr into green infrastructure over four years. Trump doesn’t focus on climate change and has made no clear plan towards a greener future for the US.

From an ESG perspective, companies that have exposure to renewable energy sources and innovations will probably perform better under a Biden win. And Biden has also stated his intent to re-join the Paris climate agreement.

What advice do you have for investors and their investment portfolios regardless of the election result?

James: Keep your long-term plan in place. Don’t make any rash decisions in the short term – remember elections come and go and economy moves on and you should base your investment decisions on that.

Kyle: Yeah, trying to position your portfolio for the outcome of an election is folly, particularly when it’s close or contentious. At the end of the day it doesn’t have much of an effect on markets as people would think.

The other side of things, is that, looking back to 2016 and Trump’s victory – what was widely expected to be a negative for markets turned out to be quite positive. Even if you get the result right, it may not have the effect you expect. When you can’t make high conviction bets, it’s just important to be broadly diversified in a portfolio that is positioned for a variety of different outcomes and you don’t have all your eggs in one basket.

 

Perpetual Investments is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information only and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or consider your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from Perpetual, please click here.

 

3 Comments
Eye
November 09, 2020

China has little need of Australian lobsters, wine, barley, etc. China has significant reserves of iron ore but would prefer to use Australia's reserves while still available. With around 500 vessels the People's Liberation Army Navy is considerably larger than the US fleet, with the equivalent of an entire British Royal Navy being added every couple of years. At 40% of global ship-building capacity China is significantly out-producing Japan or South Korea and Xi Jinping is now accelerating the buildup of the PLAN while exhorting his troops to "prepare for war". In keeping with the Chinese Communist Party's long term strategy to bring down the USA and become the world's predominant superpower before 2049 Australia's iron ore will have a significant role to play. Ref:
'The Hundred-Year Marathon' by Michael Pillsbury: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HnNEIkxzCc
'Stealth War' by Brig. Gen. Robert Spalding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8IEtlOVzq4
'Trumps Biggest Failure' by Kraut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhMAt3BluAU

Joe
November 11, 2020

There is another culture other than imperialistic one you have yet to understand. Don’t be xenophobic and psycho by the mobs.

biggusriggus
November 12, 2020

There is nothing xenophobic whatsoever about keeping abreast of the broader political climate, especially with respect to national interests. After all, that's how many of us Australian's ended up living here in the first place. It would be completely disingenuous to suggest that two nation states share the same objectives. Appreciate the recommendations.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Capital Group: What the U.S. election means for investors

MFS Investments: Blue wave fails to reach shore

The 2020 US presidential elections

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.