Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 382

MFS Investments: Blue wave fails to reach shore

While the final outcome of the US general election remains undecided, a few things have become clear: Republicans appear poised to retain control of the Senate and look likely to narrow the Democrats’ majority in the House of Representatives. The presidential race hangs in the balance, but even if former Vice President Joe Biden prevails over incumbent Donald Trump, he will likely find himself constrained legislatively.

The outlook suggests that markets anticipate lower levels of stimulus than would have occurred under a 'blue wave' scenario in which the Democrats swept both houses of Congress with comfortable majorities and regained the White House.

Markets expected such an outcome in recent weeks and priced in a 'reflation trade', pushing up long-term interest rates, value stocks, cyclical names and small-cap equities. Much of that trade is being unwound, flattening the yield curve, pushing long-term rates, real yields and inflation expectations lower while boosting stay-at-home equities, large caps, and high-tax- paying companies and undermining renewables, infrastructure and companies taxed at lower rates.

Volatility measures have declined, but the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) futures curve remains inverted and elevated relative to its history, suggesting higher-than-normal levels of volatility into early 2021.

Should Vice President Biden ultimately win, in my view he would enter office with a weak mandate relative to expectations given his underperformance and the underperformance of his party. However, the executive branch wields a great deal of power when it comes to the nation’s regulatory framework. Therefore it will be interesting to see, if Biden does win, whether his approach to regulation will also be constrained. US presidents additionally exercise tremendous power on the trade front. In this area a President Biden would be less confrontational than President Trump.

Here are our takeaways assuming a Biden victory:

  1. A multitrillion-dollar stimulus package that includes elements of the Green New Deal is likely off the table.
  2. A public option for health care insurance is also unlikely given the projected makeup of the next US Senate.
  3. The Senate will almost certainly block Biden’s plan to raise taxes on corporations and high- earning individuals.
  4. One area of potential bipartisan agreement on fiscal policy could be a moderately sized infrastructure package, given the combination of relatively high unemployment as a result of the pandemic, along with near-record-low borrowing rates.

Regardless of the election’s outcome, the economy remains impaired by the pandemic and the outlook has been complicated by the fact that the trajectory of profit margins peaked and was heading lower long before the pandemic triggered the recession. Further, a vaccine won’t cure a decade of increasingly leveraged corporate balance sheets.

Against this uncertain backdrop, we continue to seek to own companies we think will survive and emerge stronger when the pandemic subsides — with or without stimulus — while avoiding those we believe are structurally disadvantaged.

 

Robert M. Almeida is a Global Investment Strategist and Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management. This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Comments, opinions and analysis are rendered as of the date given and may change without notice due to market conditions and other factors. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The 2020 US presidential elections

Capital Group: What the U.S. election means for investors

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.