Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 156

Rules can change, but the final score still matters most

Amid the furore over the potential changes to superannuation rules, investors should not turn away from the continuing taxation benefits. Super is still the best place to save for retirement for the majority of people.

I am reminded of events during the GFC. It was as if some investors had a view on how the game should be played, rather than how it will be played. There is no point sulking over the rights and wrongs of retrospectivity, but rather, focus on the remaining advantages.

As the GFC was unfolding, some bearish friends seemed certain the whole financial system would collapse and probably never fully recover, especially after the fall of Lehman Brothers. The problem in their case was that more than anything, they wanted the system to collapse because it deserved to collapse.

Their only question was timing. Inevitably, I’d pipe up, “But don’t you think governments might take some action to prevent the complete destruction of the global economy?”, to which the reply was usually, “Investors should have known the risks and they will have to pay the costs.”

(My preference was that the destructive impact of the GFC should have been more widespread. The buying opportunities would have been even better and the lessons imparted would have been better learned. It would have been a lot longer before they were repeated.)

However, the job of an investor is to discount probabilities. The likelihood that the governments of the major economies of the world standing idly by seemed fanciful, so I steadily deployed capital into the ongoing destruction of the markets. I finally ran out of available funds in February 2009, which was only a month before the market eventually bottomed.

Understanding the rules

It is critical to operate within the rules of the system to achieve the best results, even if you don’t agree with the rules. For example, you may think that negative gearing is a foolish system that causes more harm than good and distorts the market. But while the system exists, if you intend to own investment property, you need to understand the system and structure your financial affairs to create the greatest long-term benefit. As Kerry Packer famously said, “Of course I am minimising my tax - if anybody in this country doesn't minimise their tax they want their heads read”. If the rules on negative gearing change and the benefits disappear, then you must find the most advantageous setup available under the new regime.

Another under-exploited opportunity is when couples find themselves in different tax brackets. Investment earnings should be in the lower-earning spouse’s name, and opportunities such as superannuation spouse contributions’ should be thoroughly investigated.

Superannuation remains a place where people can exploit the rules of the game, provided there is a willingness to lock precious capital away and notwithstanding the ever-changing rules of the system.

Consider the taxpayer in the 37% tax bracket who expects to be in that bracket for the rest of their working life and then retire in 20 years’ time. The table below shows the different path of $10,000 saved inside and outside of superannuation. For simplicity, the investor will make 10% per annum, equal parts earnings and capital growth with the after-tax earnings reinvested.

The capital saved out of ordinary income begins life as $6,300 (after paying 37% tax on $10,000 income). The capital contributed pre-tax to superannuation begins its life as $8,500 (after paying the 15% contributions tax). The immediate disadvantage of ordinary savings leaves the saver with only 74.1 cents ($6300/$8,500) for every superannuation dollar.

The pernicious effect of the higher tax rate widens the advantage by roughly 0.7c per dollar every year, culminating in the amount saved out of ordinary earnings being worth only 60.5% of the same amount saved behind the shield of superannuation. That is, in this 20-year example with the same earnings rate, the investor has $30,191 when saving outside super while they have $49,871 inside super, making the non-super investment only 60% of the super balance.

The Government still wants people to fund their own retirement

If you are nervous about potential changes to the superannuation system, remember that the Government wants you to fund your own retirement. They may poke around to extract additional tax revenues from the enormous superannuation savings pool, but it remains the place where the average saver is likely to generate the best return on an after-tax basis.

Know the rules of the game and exploit them to your greatest advantage.

 

Tony Hansen is Chief Investment Officer at Eternal Growth Partners. This article is for general educational purposes and does not address the investment needs of any individual.

 

2 Comments
Ramani
May 20, 2016

Tony Hansen

While most of us saw GFC as the inevitable culmination of asinine asset liability mismatch, securitisation taken to a fine art form without substance, intermediaries placing themselves ahead of consumers and investors, auditors colluding with managers in falsifying valuations and the mythical belief that Governments can never fail, you appear to divine - decades later - missed opportunities.

The rest of us lack the blinding hindsight you have retrospectively been endowed with. The next Nobel prize in medicine (ophthalmology) is surely in the post...

Sure you are not working behind the scenes to provide more opportunities via GFC Mark- 2?

Despite all this, your conclusion that super is the best long term savings vehicle for most is fair. In this case, the end justifies the means, and we will overlook your medical escapades.

Tony Hansen
May 21, 2016

I certainly am doing nothing that I'm aware of to expedite the next GFC. I abhor and avoid leverage, and so avoid it entirely. I am likewise leery of most other forms of complex financing.

Believe me when I say that it was with a cautious hand and no sense of where we would be seven years hence when I was deploying my life-savings into the wreckage wrought by the GFC.

All I was attempting to do was to assess the risk/reward and make what appeared to be the economic choice that would provide the greatest benefit for my family.

I was very fortunate, that like every other major midnight in the history of capitalism, a new dawn eventually came.

It is that self-same assessment of risk/reward I encourage others to employ by stacking the tax system in their favour in utilising the superannuation system to the greatest extent they can.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Superannuation and retirement policies

YourSuper will save $17.9 billion! Surely you’re joshing

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 455 with weekend update

The resolve of many investors to focus on the long term with their share portfolios is increasingly tested as the list of negatives lengthens. There is a lack of visionary policies during an election campaign and stimulatory spending is contradicting the aims of tighter monetary policy.

  • 28 April 2022

Latest Updates

In praise of our unique democracy and its sausage

For all the shortcomings of our political campaigns, our election process is the best. We are blessed with honest administrators and procedures that we all trust to hand over power peacefully, with a big snag. 

Investment strategies

Is the investing landscape really different this time?

Many market analysts argue that the pandemic has changed everything but we must judge whether the circumstances are as drastic as billed. A quick review of four major events helps decide if this time is different.

Economy

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Retirement

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

About 39% of the labour force is aged over 45. Intergenerational reports highlight the challenges of an ageing population and the impacts on consumption patterns, dependencies, public finances and economic growth.

The real story behind the crypto crash

The recent sell-off in the crypto market and its trigger - the collapse of the Terra UST coin - has affected many institutions either holding or trading crypto assets, including crypto fund managers.

Investment strategies

Cash is the nightingale, the bird in the hand

The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and it's an apt metaphor for investment choices. In 2021, as investors hunted in the bush for decent returns, demand overwhelmed supply. Cash is the bird in the hand.

Strategy

Book review of 'Putin’s People' and his motivation for war

Author Catherine Belton argues Putin’s sole ambition is to hold onto power. Her book seeks to understand why Putin invaded Ukraine after he became isolated and out of touch with reality during the pandemic.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.