Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 190

Size matters for SMSF performance

An SMSF needs a balance of at least $200,000 to be cost-effective and sustainable, new research by SuperConcepts and The University of Adelaide’s International Centre for Financial Services has found.

A major study, When Size Matters: A closer look at SMSF performance, based on more than 88,000 fund-year observations, examined the performance of four fund sizes. The study found that SMSFs with balances over $200,000 significantly outperformed smaller funds in both cost-effectiveness and investment diversification. All SMSFs in the study had outsourced their administration.

Just over 20,000 individual funds, with an average asset value of $845,000 and average annual expenses of $8,919, were examined using figures from the 2008-9 to 2014-15 financial years.

The fund sizes were:

Size 1 funds: Asset values less than $200,000

Size 2 funds: Asset values between $201,000 and $500,000

Size 3 funds: Asset value between $501,000 and $1,000,000

Size 4 Funds: Asset values greater than $1,000,000.

As shown below, SMSF performance was found to be relatively similar for size 2 to 4 funds, although fund size 4 outperformed the others slightly during the last three fiscal years of the study period. The smallest size 1 funds consistently underperformed against all other sizes, and posted negative returns in five of the seven sampled financial years, including the last four.

SMSF performance

SMSF performance

Diversification into asset types

The study measured diversification by the number of asset classes in which a fund had invested with a weighting of 10% or more.

The largest size 4 funds held significantly more asset classes than size 1 SMSFs and, in fact, a balance of less than $200,000 showed deterioration in asset diversification.

“Fund diversification has, on the whole, marginally improved over time,” the report says. “At the beginning of our sample period, the average fund held investments in 2.06 asset classes, and this has increased to 2.15 at the end of our sample period. We observe an inverse relationship between the level of diversification and the volatility of fund returns.”

Expenses come in many guises

SMSFs incur many establishment and administration costs. The ATO’s list of common costs include:

 

 

  • actuarial costs

 

  • accountancy fees

 

  • audit fees

 

  • costs of complying with Government regulations

 

  • investment adviser fees

 

  • SMSF’s annual lodgement fee

 

  • life insurance or total and permanent disability insurance premiums

 

  • investment research subscriptions, and

 

  • costs for amending a trust deed.

 

As funds grow larger, the expense ratio drops due to greater operational efficiency.

“Expense ratios for the largest funds (size 4) are significantly lower than the expense ratios for the smallest funds (size 1). When a fund passes a threshold of having $550,000 under management, its expense ratio dips below 2%, whilst diversification and performance of the fund is comparable to any of the larger funds. Below this threshold, performance, diversification and expenses begin to deteriorate”.

The study concludes that while performance, diversification and expense ratios continue to improve as funds grow, these traits deteriorate in funds with asset balances below $200,000, making smaller funds inefficient. Some commentators suggest that small SMSFs are not sustainable and that the government should legislate a mandatory minimum size to start an SMSF.

 

Lee Anthony is studying for her Masters of Publishing at the University of Sydney. The full report can be downloaded here: 'When size matters: A closer look at SMSF performance'.

5 Comments
Doug
February 16, 2017

Hi SMSF Trustee,
What I meant was I was given those quotes for just the same basic service. I have no problem with paying more for further services but that was not what I was offered by the four administrators that asked for quotes after having personal meetings with three. I ended up going with an internet service.

Doug Reynolds
February 16, 2017

Sorry SMSF but I have to disagree with you. My administrator charges $795 and does a great job.

SMSF Trustee
February 16, 2017

I'm not sure if the Doug to whom I replied is the same as Doug Reynolds, but on the assumption that he is, then I'm sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying. I read the original post as saying that fees of $790 up to $3,500 were a rip off, as advisors just seeing SMSF as a cash cow by charging those fees. If that's not what you were saying then perhaps we're actually in agreement, but that's how I read it.

If you're getting a great service for $795 then that's fantastic. It sounds like just a basic compliance service, not a full self-management capability (mine includes trading on-line, fund information and research, information about legislative changes, full audit and tax returns, daily valuations of all assets and on-line access to valuations, etc). But if it gives you what you want, that's excellent.

SMSF Trustee
February 16, 2017

Sorry to be really blunt, but that's nonsense Doug. For the work that is done by anyone doing even a half decent job of auditing, doing tax returns and managing ATO relationships, processing investment switches, providing reports on fund income, capital gains, etc, admin fees of anything less than $5000 are very, very cheap in my view.

My fund is at the larger end of what's in the survey and I pay just over $10,000 a year in admin fees, but the work that's done gives me total peace of mind about the Fund complying with the law and being properly managed at all times.

Get real about the costs of investing people!

Doug
February 16, 2017

One reason that smaller funds underperform is the size of the Admin fees. I have been quoted anything between $790 for full admin including audit to $3500. I think a lot of advisors and accountants see SMSF management as a new cash cow.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The SMSF gaps in the Productivity Commission’s Superannuation Report

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Chinese steel - building a Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes

China's steel production, equivalent to building one Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes, has driven Australia's economic growth. With China's slowdown, what does this mean for Australia's economy and investments?

Latest Updates

Economy

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Investing

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Property

Australian house price speculators: What were you thinking?

Australian housing’s 50-year boom was driven by falling rates and rising borrowing power — not rent or yield. With those drivers exhausted, future returns must reconcile with economic fundamentals. Are we ready?

Shares

ASX reporting season: Room for optimism

Despite mixed ASX results, the market has shown surprising resilience. With rate cuts ahead and economic conditions improving, investors should look beyond short-term noise and position for a potential cyclical upswing.

Property

A Bunnings play without the hefty price tag

BWT Trust has moved to bring management in house. Meanwhile, many of the properties it leases to Bunnings have been repriced to materially higher rents. This has removed two of the key 'snags' holding back the stock.

Investment strategies

Replacing bank hybrids with something similar

With APRA phasing out bank hybrids from 2027, investors must reassess these complex instruments. A synthetic hybrid strategy may offer similar returns but with greater control and clearer understanding of risks.

Shares

Nvidia's CEO is selling. Here's why Aussie investors should care

The magnitude of founder Jensen Huang’s selldown may seem small, but the signal is hard to ignore. When the person with the clearest insight into the company’s future starts cashing out, it’s worth asking why.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.