Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 190

Size matters for SMSF performance

An SMSF needs a balance of at least $200,000 to be cost-effective and sustainable, new research by SuperConcepts and The University of Adelaide’s International Centre for Financial Services has found.

A major study, When Size Matters: A closer look at SMSF performance, based on more than 88,000 fund-year observations, examined the performance of four fund sizes. The study found that SMSFs with balances over $200,000 significantly outperformed smaller funds in both cost-effectiveness and investment diversification. All SMSFs in the study had outsourced their administration.

Just over 20,000 individual funds, with an average asset value of $845,000 and average annual expenses of $8,919, were examined using figures from the 2008-9 to 2014-15 financial years.

The fund sizes were:

Size 1 funds: Asset values less than $200,000

Size 2 funds: Asset values between $201,000 and $500,000

Size 3 funds: Asset value between $501,000 and $1,000,000

Size 4 Funds: Asset values greater than $1,000,000.

As shown below, SMSF performance was found to be relatively similar for size 2 to 4 funds, although fund size 4 outperformed the others slightly during the last three fiscal years of the study period. The smallest size 1 funds consistently underperformed against all other sizes, and posted negative returns in five of the seven sampled financial years, including the last four.

SMSF performance

SMSF performance

Diversification into asset types

The study measured diversification by the number of asset classes in which a fund had invested with a weighting of 10% or more.

The largest size 4 funds held significantly more asset classes than size 1 SMSFs and, in fact, a balance of less than $200,000 showed deterioration in asset diversification.

“Fund diversification has, on the whole, marginally improved over time,” the report says. “At the beginning of our sample period, the average fund held investments in 2.06 asset classes, and this has increased to 2.15 at the end of our sample period. We observe an inverse relationship between the level of diversification and the volatility of fund returns.”

Expenses come in many guises

SMSFs incur many establishment and administration costs. The ATO’s list of common costs include:

  • actuarial costs
  • accountancy fees
  • audit fees
  • costs of complying with Government regulations
  • investment adviser fees
  • SMSF’s annual lodgement fee
  • life insurance or total and permanent disability insurance premiums
  • investment research subscriptions, and
  • costs for amending a trust deed.

As funds grow larger, the expense ratio drops due to greater operational efficiency.

“Expense ratios for the largest funds (size 4) are significantly lower than the expense ratios for the smallest funds (size 1). When a fund passes a threshold of having $550,000 under management, its expense ratio dips below 2%, whilst diversification and performance of the fund is comparable to any of the larger funds. Below this threshold, performance, diversification and expenses begin to deteriorate”.

The study concludes that while performance, diversification and expense ratios continue to improve as funds grow, these traits deteriorate in funds with asset balances below $200,000, making smaller funds inefficient. Some commentators suggest that small SMSFs are not sustainable and that the government should legislate a mandatory minimum size to start an SMSF.

 

Lee Anthony is studying for her Masters of Publishing at the University of Sydney. The full report can be downloaded here: 'When size matters: A closer look at SMSF performance'.

5 Comments
Doug
February 17, 2017

Hi SMSF Trustee,
What I meant was I was given those quotes for just the same basic service. I have no problem with paying more for further services but that was not what I was offered by the four administrators that asked for quotes after having personal meetings with three. I ended up going with an internet service.

Doug Reynolds
February 16, 2017

Sorry SMSF but I have to disagree with you. My administrator charges $795 and does a great job.

SMSF Trustee
February 16, 2017

I'm not sure if the Doug to whom I replied is the same as Doug Reynolds, but on the assumption that he is, then I'm sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying. I read the original post as saying that fees of $790 up to $3,500 were a rip off, as advisors just seeing SMSF as a cash cow by charging those fees. If that's not what you were saying then perhaps we're actually in agreement, but that's how I read it.

If you're getting a great service for $795 then that's fantastic. It sounds like just a basic compliance service, not a full self-management capability (mine includes trading on-line, fund information and research, information about legislative changes, full audit and tax returns, daily valuations of all assets and on-line access to valuations, etc). But if it gives you what you want, that's excellent.

SMSF Trustee
February 16, 2017

Sorry to be really blunt, but that's nonsense Doug. For the work that is done by anyone doing even a half decent job of auditing, doing tax returns and managing ATO relationships, processing investment switches, providing reports on fund income, capital gains, etc, admin fees of anything less than $5000 are very, very cheap in my view.

My fund is at the larger end of what's in the survey and I pay just over $10,000 a year in admin fees, but the work that's done gives me total peace of mind about the Fund complying with the law and being properly managed at all times.

Get real about the costs of investing people!

Doug
February 16, 2017

One reason that smaller funds underperform is the size of the Admin fees. I have been quoted anything between $790 for full admin including audit to $3500. I think a lot of advisors and accountants see SMSF management as a new cash cow.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The SMSF gaps in the Productivity Commission’s Superannuation Report

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Five stock recoveries not hanging on COVID predictions

The focus on predicting the recovery from the pandemic is the wrong emphasis. Better to identify great companies benefitting from market changes over a three- to five-year horizon with or without COVID.

Peak to peak, which LIC managers performed during COVID?

A comprehensive review of dozens of LICs shows how they performed in the crucial 'peak to peak' of COVID. This 14 months tested the mettle and strategies of a sector often under fire, with many strong results.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Blink and you missed a seismic shift in these stocks

Blink and it happened. If announcements in this sector were made by a producer of iron ore, gas, copper or some new tech, the news would have been splashed across the front pages. Have we witnessed a major change?

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Latest Updates

Shares

Platinum’s four guiding investment principles

Buying mispriced stocks is often uncomfortable when companies are outside the spotlight and markets are driven by emotions. And it's inescapable that the price paid ultimately determines the end result.

Interviews

Andrew Lockhart on corporate loans as an income alternative

Loans to corporates were the traditional domain of banks, but as investors look for income alternatives to term deposits, funds have combined hundreds of loans into a single structure to create a diversified investment.

Retirement

10 things I learned in my faux-retirement

Pre-retirees should ‘trial run’ their retirements. All those things you want to do - play golf, time with the family, a hobby, write a book - might not be so appealing in reality, but you might discover other benefits.

Retirement

Achieving a sufficient retirement income portfolio

Retirees require a reliable income stream to replace the wages they received when they were working and should focus on the dollar income generated over time rather than the headline yield percentage.

'Wealth of Experience' podcast and ASA webinar on ETFs v LICs

Peter reveals some top stock picks with an emphasis on long-term assets like Sydney Airport, Graham discusses spending in retirement and valuing assets, the key to Amazon, guest Andrew Lockhart and plenty more.

Strategy

Lucy Turnbull’s three lessons on leadership and successful careers

From promoting women to boost culture to taking opportunities as they arise, Lucy Turnbull AO says markets should not drive decision-making and leaders must live and breathe the company's mission and values.

Economy

Are concerns about inflation inflated?

While REITs and some value stocks are considered 'inflation-sensitive' assets, the data provide little support that they are good inflation hedges, and energy stocks and commodities are too volatile. So what works?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.