Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 158

SMSFs and infrastructure is marriage made in heaven

It would seem a marriage made in heaven. An Australia thirsty for infrastructure capital and SMSF trustees looking for investments offering a healthy yield at a time of record low interest rates with less volatility than either property or equities.

Research shows a majority of trustees think long term when making their investment decisions. An asset class that falls between cash/government bonds and property/equities in terms of risk profile and offering yields above the cash rate would have appeal to the more than one million people who are SMSF trustees and members. In particular, those in the retirement phase, where income is a priority, would welcome access to this asset class.

The reality is, however, that SMSFs are effectively shut out from direct infrastructure investment – a potential $590 billion in funds under management can’t find a direct infrastructure home.

Massive demand for infrastructure

There can be no debate that Australia’s infrastructure needs could sorely do with this capital. Like all developed countries, Australia needs to both replenish its existing infrastructure and invest in new stock as our population grows rapidly. It is estimated Australia’s population will reach 30 million people by 2030, and that number will require an infrastructure spend of at least $350 billion in the next decade, according to the Australian Council of Learned Academics.

Politicians of all shades have recognised this need. Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott wanted to be known as the “Infrastructure Prime Minister”. His successor, Malcolm Turnbull, appointed a Minister for Cities, recognising that much of the spending will need to be in the major cities, particularly Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, where the combined population is expected to reach 18 million by 2030. Motorists in these cities today will relate horror stories about road congestion; imagine how much worse it will be if the issue is ignored and populations grow at these projected rates.

It’s not just traffic congestion. Water, rail (urban and inter-city), energy and telecommunications, ports (air and sea) will all require investment if Australia is to have a fully-productive economy. But infrastructure comes with a hefty price tag, and governments of all persuasions face budgetary restraints. In this fiscal environment, the $2 trillion superannuation pool is an obvious source of capital.

Barriers to SMSF investment

To date only some of the larger funds have invested directly in this asset class. At 30 June 2015, the APRA-regulated funds had $54.8 billion (4% of their total FUM) invested in Australian and overseas infrastructure. Of this figure, two superannuation sectors, industry funds and public sector funds, dominate with $45.8 billion (84%). But clearly more capital is needed, and the $590 billion SMSF sector seems an obvious choice.

Currently most super funds invest in infrastructure programmes that require capital exceeding $500 million, but SMSFs are perfectly placed to invest in smaller infrastructure projects (i.e. $100 million or less), which have funding structured appropriately for them.

But it is extremely difficult for SMSFs to invest directly in infrastructure. The reasons are many but four stand out:

  • high dollar entry point
  • illiquidity of the asset
  • hefty entry and ongoing management fees
  • lack of strong government backing for this initiative.

So why haven’t governments (and the industry for that matter) devised solutions to allow SMSFs to invest in infrastructure. It surely can’t be that governments believe the investment acumen needed for this asset class is beyond SMSF trustees. The evidence is overwhelming that they are smart investors.

A Commsec report issued in late 2015 showed SMSF trustees were early buyers when the share market dropped. A recent ATO report said:

“Changes in the composition of SMSF asset portfolios show the ability of (trustees) to adjust to changing circumstances and economic conditions.”

In recent times, trustees have shown a growing appetite for ETFs and overseas shares (typically via managed funds) as they diversify away from their traditional investments in blue-chip Australian equities, cash and property.

What needs to be done?

The problem is far from insurmountable, as the SMSF Association outlined in its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), before the Senate Economics Committee, and to the Federal Government and other relevant stakeholders.

The options we canvassed included offering unitised investments in smaller parcels (our figure was $25,000) or issuing small-scale infrastructure bonds. If these options were adopted, then the issue of risk would have to be addressed. While investment in brownfield infrastructure does offer a degree of security, the same cannot be said of greenfield projects (think BrisConnect and the Lane Cove tunnel). A government guarantee or support might be part of the investment equation.

Liquidity is an issue that will demand answers from trustees with a secondary market probably the most viable option. Trustees, especially those in the retirement phase, will want to be able to trade their investments if their financial circumstances change. But although they will want this option, their investment history shows they are ‘sticky’ investors who take investment decisions based on the long term. Liquidity is not just an issue for SMSFs, with the APRA-regulated funds also raising the topic in their submissions to the FSI.

Those who argue managed funds offer infrastructure assets for the retail market must accept this is only part of the solution. It overlooks the fact that trustees prefer to invest directly. Losses incurred by managed funds in the wake of the GFC left trustees wary about this investment structure.

Politicians and the industry need to bring some ingenuity to this issue, because it is hard to see the downside. SMSF trustees want yield, and have the investment acumen to understand this asset class. On the other side of the ledger, Australia needs capital for infrastructure, and to effectively exclude a $590 billion pool seems short-sighted, to say the least. It’s an issue the incoming government must address and engage on with the industry.


Andrea Slattery is Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of the SMSF Association.



Advantages of splitting superannuation contributions

Getting the most from your age pension


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Latest Updates


'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Policy proposals allow young people to access their super for a home bought from older people who put the money back into super. It helps some first buyers into a home earlier but it may push up prices.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.


Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.


Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.


Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.