Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 60

Status, longevity and the age pension

Policy makers seem to overlook the fact that people of higher socio-economic status have longer life times. Unfortunately, there is little data from Australia to study this effect. It requires greater study considering the impact on financial planning for the high socio-economic client and the topical issue of increasing the age pension entitlement age.

Socio-economic status

Until 2005, the UK Office of Statistics published separate mortality tables every five years for six different occupational classifications. This is the best public mortality data set available at a national level related to socio-economic status. The classifications range from Class 1 (‘Professional’) to Class V (‘Unskilled’). The difference in average life expectancy from age 65 for these two classifications was 4.2 years for males and 4.3 years for females in the 2005 data. Since the first data in 1976, life expectancy increased more for higher status than for lower status.

There are a range of possible explanations. Unskilled occupations may have involved greater risk and lead to health problems in later life. Professionals may have developed better diet and health care habits that extend into later life. However there are deeper dimensions and career experiences within occupations.

Someone who has studied these deeper dimensions is Sir Michael Marmot. Originally from Australia where he graduated in medicine in 1968, he became an international expert in longitudinal studies of health and longevity. His book, ‘Status Syndrome’, published in 2004, is a comprehensive coverage of his work in a field that might be labelled psychosocial effects on health and longevity. My conclusions from Marmot’s work are that whilst health status and income are significant determinants of longevity, differences in longevity in later life are also due to the level of autonomy and engagement people have enjoyed in their careers.

A first implication of these conclusions is that financial planners lucky enough to capture clients with these fortunate career attributes as well as financial self sufficiency, need to factor in a substantially longer life time (and future improvement) than population averages.

A second implication relates to how age pension policy is being managed. In current public debate it is an easy logic to argue something like “since the age pension started in 1909, average life expectancy has increased by 25 years so we need to keep updating the age pension entitlement age”. Average life expectancy is a neat tool for this argument; however it ignores the dimensions around this average of people with different status.

For example, women now in their 50’s and 60’s who through child rearing and divorce may have had little opportunity to enjoy autonomous and engaging careers may have little in the way of superannuation and financial assets. Waiting until age 67 or 70 for the age pension, with limited employment opportunities and below subsistence unemployment benefits, is not a satisfactory situation. Similar arguments could be applied to manual workers who physically struggle to continue occupations past age 60.

A more sophisticated approach

A better approach to age pension reform than just increasing the eligibility age for all would be to apply a more sophisticated status and financial means test from say age 60. This could be blended proportionately with a different status and means test applying fully from say age 80. Full pension rates might be different in the age 60 and 80 formulae. This approach could accommodate full inclusion of home value and (non-annuitised) superannuation assets with greater public acceptance. Let’s stop treating people as if they’re all the same when they reach age 70.

Editor’s Note: For additional material on this subject from the Wall Street Journal, 18 April 2014, see ‘The Richer You Are, the Older You’ll Get.’

 

Bruce Gregor is an actuary and demographic researcher at Financial Demographics and established the website www.findem.com.au.

RELATED ARTICLES

A brighter view of dependency ratios

Longevity awareness and the three pillars

Making judgments based on age

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.