Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 190

A study of NAB’s Subordinated Notes 2

NAB has just announced the launch of a new income offer, NAB Subordinated Notes 2, with the primary purpose of repaying NAB Subordinated Notes (NABHB), which are due to mature this year.

The Notes will pay a quarterly coupon of 2.2%-2.3% (margin determined by the book build) over the 90-day bank bill swap rate (BBSW), which was 1.77% at 10 February 2017. The initial indicative rate will be 3.97%-4.07% pa with the rate set on the date of issue. The Notes are expected to redeem on 20 September 2023 (subject to mandatory conditions not being breached) and will be tradable on the ASX under code NABPE.

Subordinated notes

A key consideration in this issue versus last year’s hybrid or preference share issues from CBA, NAB and Westpac that offered margins of 4.9%-5.2% over BBSW is that NABPE is a subordinated note and will be treated as Tier 2 Capital. The reduced margin reflects the lower risk of these securities and offers investors another risk choice. This is more akin to a debt instrument, and unlike the listed bank capital notes and preference shares, distributions are non-discretionary.

Comparable securities

While there are a handful of listed subordinated notes (ANZHA, WBCHA, WBCHB and NABHB), Westpac Capital Notes 2 remains the only listed issue containing a non-viability clause (explained later) and offers the closest comparison.

Due to the short term to maturity of the existing Tier 2 subordinated notes, investors should also consider the unlisted institutional market when looking at relative pricing.

Arguably, the closest comparable in the unlisted market is NAB’s Tier 2 Floating Rate Notes expected to be repaid in 2021 (NAB +240 LT2 FRN above).

Our view on NAB Subordinated Notes 2

We find that retail investors are often looking to hybrids as an alternative to cash accounts rather than equities. The fall in cash rates to historical lows means investors are forced to look elsewhere than term deposits or cash accounts for income and hybrids have been a natural beneficiary.

However, subordinated notes are often overlooked as their perceived risk among direct investors is equal to preference shares and capital notes. This likely explains the wider margins we often see in the listed subordinated notes vs the unlisted market.

Our view is that they can offer value as an alternative to investor portfolios. The greater security, lower volatility and increased certainty of income distributions means they are attractive to those willing to take more risk than government bonds yielding below 2% pa and term deposits yielding anywhere between 2%-2.5% pa, but less volatility than the listed hybrids. In a world where rates look like they may be on the rise, floating rate notes can offer value to investors seeking income.

Equity pundits will often point to equities providing both income and capital growth, but for investors who can’t stomach the equity roller coaster, subordinated notes offer a lower risk alternative to equities, preference shares and capital notes.

Pricing NAB Subordinated Notes 2

At first glance, the Margin to Maturity of both listed and unlisted subordinated notes indicates that NAB’s anticipated margin of 2.2% over BBSW is priced in line with the secondary market. However, the listed market typically trades at wider premiums than the institutional market and we would prefer a wider margin. In addition, the new NAB issue includes some updated APRA-required write-off clauses which make it rank junior to other Tier 2 issues by NAB.

Note: Investors in subordinated notes earn the sum of the margin and BBSW.

The pricing reality is that NAB does not need to pay over the odds and the bank is not looking to raise large swathes of new money. The majority of this issue is expected to be acquired by existing investors rolling from NABHB and the lack of longer term ASX-listed subordinated notes means the demand will be strong.

Overall, it’s an opportunity for investors to diversify into lower risk listed securities that offer greater capital stability than hybrids. Do not feel neglected if you do not secure an allocation, and investors should note the anticipated repayment of ANZHA and WBCHA in mid-2017 is likely to result in further issuance in the near future.

Note there is automatic conversion under the Non-Viability Trigger Event (explained below) and income is unfranked. Investors often overlook that returns quoted on some hybrids include franking credits. Unfranked payments should be considered more attractive, avoiding the need to wait until the end of the tax year to claim back the franking.

Non-Viability and Inability Event clauses

Investors who are familiar with the new style hybrids seen over the last couple of years will be aware of the new clauses. They are a result of APRA requiring further reassurance that in another GFC event, if required, some securities such as hybrids would convert to ordinary equity, thereby reducing the bank’s debt costs and protecting deposit holders.

Now that banks have to hold a higher level of subordinated debt and a better-quality loan book, it seems unlikely that these conditions will be breached, however, investors would do well to consider the increased disclosure and warnings within each prospectus over the last couple of years.

Newer style subordinated notes contain a Non-Viability Trigger Event that is subject to rulings by APRA that have yet to be tested. In theory, should APRA view the bank as non-viable without a capital injection, the subordinated notes and Tier 1 hybrids would automatically convert to ordinary shares. Tier 1 hybrids would convert prior to Tier 2 subordinated notes, and there may be junior categories within the subordinated notes issues.

We have also seen a gradual introduction of an Inability Event Clause which states that in the event that the issuer is unable to issue further ordinary shares (ie the company has ceased trading), note holders lose their investment. Investors would do well to remember this is an additional risk.

NAB Subordinated Notes 2 will be listed on the ASX and the price will be subject to market movements. Investors selling on market may receive a price lower or higher than the issue price.

 

Sulieman Ravell is Managing Director at Wealth Focus, and publishes the FundsFocus newsletter This article is general in nature and it does not take into account your needs, objectives or financial situation. You should always take these matters into consideration before making an investment decision.

  •   16 February 2017
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why bank hybrids are far too expensive

Is it time to sell bank hybrids?

The best income-generating assets for your portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.