Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 313

Super is delivering for people about to retire

Contrary to many opinions, super is reducing reliance on the age pension for the large majority of people entering retirement. At the end of December 2018, only 45% of 66-year-olds were accessing the age pension, and only 25% of 66-year-olds were drawing a full age pension.

The average consolidated super balance for Australians aged 60-64 (i.e. those approaching retirement) is now over $300,000. This is far from where the super system peaks, as average balances continue to rise across all age groups as the system matures.

Average consolidated super account balance, by age

Source: Taxation statistics, ATO

The success of super is widespread

The average retirement phase member balance across all large APRA funds at June 2018 was $281,253. These are not consolidated balances, but it is far less likely for a member to have multiple account-based pensions than it is to have multiple accounts in the accumulation phase.

This figure is an average of balances spread across all age cohorts in retirement and will include older retirees who have either spent the bulk of their super or never had much in the first place (only one in five people aged over 75 has a super balance).

Super balances at the household level

Most people enter retirement as a couple, so considering the combined super balances of a couple household in the 60-64 age group is a better measure of how well people are financially prepared for retirement.

The majority of people in the 60-64 age group are part of a couple. The combined super balance of a couple-household will be higher than the average male balance in this age group of $336,360. The average female balance is $278,000, but simply adding these averages together would be misrepresenting the likely true picture. Broken work patterns and part-time work need to be factored in.

This means that a typical couple-household will probably be starting retirement today with more than $400,000 in super.

Who is getting the age pension?

These averages are significant in that they are all above the lower threshold for the age pension assets test of $258,500. This means that the average member in the retirement phase does not get the full age pension.

In 2018, only 42% of age-eligible retirees were on the full age pension. This is an overall average and includes retirees in their 90s who have never had super.

Recent retirees are much less likely to be on the full age pension, with the typical super balance at retirement for a household over $400,000, and most owning their own home. As stated above, Department of Social Services (DSS) data reveal that the majority of new retirees are not accessing any age pension and only 25% of 66-year-olds were accessing a full age pension.

The apparent success of super in building savings at retirement means most people can expect to spend longer in retirement before they receive any age pension.

Age pension access at selected ages, as at December 2018

Source: Calculations based on ABS and supplied DSS data.

Retirees will need access to secure and reliable income

The next phase for large APRA funds will be to make it easier for their members to convert an appropriate part of their super into secure, lifetime income to compensate for their delayed and reduced access to the age pension.

Jeremy Cooper is Chairman, Retirement Income, at Challenger. The full research report by Challenger can be accessed here.

9 Comments
Tom
July 09, 2019

Our sons grew up observing us accumulate super over 30 years in an SMSF. We were very successful until the 2016 budget betrayal taught them and us a lesson about sovereign theft.
That was the final straw that broke our faith in anything associated with government pledges pertaining to super.
We were fortunate in that we were at an age we could take it all out and we thankfully did.
I was a hands on expert in SMSF's and spent 30 years ducking and weaving through the SIS act. Many years ago I joined the national tax association as trustee of our SMSF and did hundreds of hours on trusts and SMSF regulations. It just got to a level of complexity that was ridiculous. A dog's breakfast regurgitated.
Why would anyone now tie their money up for 20-50 years knowing that with the ever changing goal posts you have no hope of being treated in a fair and equitable fashion when you retire. If your self employed invest in your business the tax advantages are better with less regulation.

David
July 08, 2019

Does college mean university? Or are they using Americanisms in the HILDA survey?

Michael Keane
July 08, 2019

Using HILDA data from 2001-2016, here are Age Pension take up rates at age 65 compared to age 75, broken down by education level:

Age 65 Age 75

College 19% 42%

High school 44% 74%

HS Dropouts 50% 81%

So the pattern that age pension participation is relatively low at age 65, and then rises with age, has been true for a long time. The low participation rate for people who recently turned 65 is nothing new - it's right in line with the historical pattern. There is no reason to think they won't rely on the Age Pension more as they get older.

Alfredo
July 05, 2019

When I came to Australia 40 years ago under the Skilled Migration program, I was told that by the time I reached pension age, the government would look after me in my old age, provided I worked hard and consistently. So I did. In the meantime, I managed to save enough to buy an investment property, which I am still paying off. I sacrificed luxuries, holidays, entertainment, even health issues so I could keep the property.
Today, I am about to retire and I have been told I will be lucky to access a part-pension.
I feel cheated and let down by the government and the saddest thing is there is nothing I can do!!!

Chris
July 07, 2019

And you believed them ?!

This is the same logic that companies had towards our parents (as a Gen-X), that "the company will look after you" before making them redundant at 55 and unable to claim a pension on either the State (already got their company pension and too much money as a redundancy payout) or their own pension fund which they could access at 65.

So we (Gen X) don't trust anyone - the Government, the company, no one - except ourselves, to look after ourselves in retirement.

People would do well to take the same line as me, and yes, I'm a migrant too, which just instilled that even more in me, that "I'm the one who will look after myself".

davidy
July 04, 2019

Very interesting stat that only 45% of 66 year olds are now claiming the pension.

Looks like a result of surging property prices allowing people to downsize/move up the coast with cash in the bank plus the increases in the level of assets before the pension can be claimed.

Chris
July 07, 2019

If you want the pension, you probably won't get it because you have too many assets.

If you need the pension, you won't really want it because it's essentially, poverty line wages.

Therefore, the message is clear. Look after yourselves.

John at Clime
July 04, 2019

Hi Jeremy,

I believe that you are measuring the success of superannuation using a fairly meaningless measure.

I think success should be measured by a society creating a pension outcome that ensures all retirees have a standard of living commensurate with living in Australia. It should consider all outcomes of retirement and aging.

Being not entitled to receive a Commonwealth pension is hardly a measure of success as I would define it.

It is axiomatic that if the Government imposes a superannuation contribution requirement (decades ago) inside an accounts based superannuation system that people will retire with a balance of money inside their pension fund.

To move some of these people (retirees) from the Commonwealth age pension entitlement merely requires the Government to lift the assets test entitlement level.

Adjust the assets test higher and you have more people not entitled. But is the capital that they have accumulated or saved sufficient to give them a reasonable retirement outcome?

With longevity and aged care requirements coming into play it is arguable that a average couple at 65 years old is underfunded if they do not have $1.5 million at least.

Unless the government is going to invest heavily in aged care so as to make this pre-death expense affordable then I believe that our superannuation system is a long way short of success.

Just my view.

Regards
John Abernethy

Carlos
July 05, 2019

agree with John.
just because someone doesn't get the aged pension doesn't necessarily mean they live a comfortable retirement.
especially the way governments are increasingly changing Super rules to suit their budgets rather than the outcomes of retirees.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

$1 million v $500,000 and accepting a pension

$1 million is never worth less than $500,000

Retirement: Making income the outcome

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

24 hot stocks and funds for 2021

Many investors use the new year to review their portfolios, and in this free ebook, two dozen fund managers and product providers give their best ideas for 2021 - some stocks, some funds, some sectors.

Great new ways the Government helps retirees

Last year's retiree checklist of services available was one of our most popular articles. There are some additions for 2021, and while it can take effort to set them up, they can pay off over the long term.

The hazards of asset allocation in a late-stage major bubble

The Grantham article everyone is quoting, in full. "The long, long bull market since 2009 has finally matured into a fully-fledged epic bubble ... this could very well be the most important event of your investing lives."

Four simple strategies deliver long-term investing comfort

A long-time advocate of the merits of generating income by investing in industrial companies rather than bonds or deposits checks his 'mothership' chart for the latest results, and continues to feel vindicated.

Cut it out ... millionaires are not wealthy

The widespread use of 'millionaire' must stop. Inflation means that the basket of goods and services that cost $1 million in 1960 now requires $15 million. Today, millionaires are not wealthy.

Retirement changes everything: a post-retirement investing framework

Categorising post-retirement needs – living, lifestyle, legacy and contingency – creates a framework for retirees. Advisers can translate these needs into investment goals and portfolios.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Unfortunately, all fund manager presentations are good

Part of the fund manager's job is to raise money from investors, and with years of practice, a few good stock stories and an educated guess on the future, it's not hard to present well. That's a problem for investors.

Latest from Morningstar

Win some, lose some: Buffett's 2020 scorecard

Warren Buffett's investment portfolio gains attention because of his legendary status, but parts of his empire in insurance, railways, metalworking and aircraft suppliers have been damaged by the pandemic.

Shares

Prefer or defer? Sector and investment themes for 2021

It's time for equity prices to more closely tie to a company’s underlying near-term earnings trajectory and financial strength. Despite the market trading at record levels, some stocks have been left behind.

Retirement

Is cancelling the SG increase a retiree version of ‘Buy now, pay later’?

No doubt, any reduction or deferral in the SG increase would be received favourably by many. However, early access and lower contributions undermine the foundation of our super system.

Three ways to match housing affordability with good returns

This increased focus on affordable housing is welcome but the challenge is that investors typically require ‘market’ rate financial returns. By definition, social housing tenants cannot pay market rent.

Investment strategies

Investors face their own Breaking Bad moment

Savers are making small decision after small decision that leads them away from investing and closer to outright speculating. Time will tell if this ends in a bloody climax or we all live happily ever after.

Shares

Australian banks prove resilient but risks remain

Australian major banks reported a decline in financial performance in 2020 but as the impact of the pandemic evolves, the banks maintained a strong focus on customers. Is the renewed market optimism justified?

  • KPMG
  • 1 January 2020

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.