Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.
25 April 2024
Recently trending
Reader: " Finding a truly independent and interesting read has been magical for me. Please keep it up and don't change!"
Rob Henshaw: "When I open my computer each day it's the first link I click - a really great read."
Reader: "Carry on as you are - well done. The average investor/SMSF trustee needs all the help they can get."
David Goldschmidt, Chartered Accountant: "I find this a really excellent newsletter. The best I get. Keep up the good work!"
Jonathan Hoyle, CEO, Stanford Brown: "A fabulous publication. The only must-read weekly publication for the Australian wealth management industry."
Ian Silk, CEO, AustralianSuper: "It has become part of my required reading: quality thinking, and (mercifully) to the point."
Reader: "Is one of very few places an investor can go and not have product rammed down their throat. Love your work!"
Reader: "Congratulations on a great focussed news source. Australia has a dearth of good quality unbiased financial and wealth management news."
Eleanor Dartnall, AFA Adviser of the Year, 2014: "Our clients love your newsletter. Your articles are avidly read by advisers and they learn a great deal."
Reader: "I can quickly sort the items that I am interested in, then research them more fully. It is also a regular reminder that I need to do this."
John Egan, Egan Associates: "My heartiest congratulations. Your panel of contributors is very impressive and keep your readers fully informed."
Scott Pape, author of The Barefoot Investor: "I'm an avid reader of Cuffelinks. Thanks for the wonderful resource you have here, it really is first class."
Professor Robert Deutsch: "This has got to be the best set of articles on economic and financial matters. Always something worthwhile reading in Firstlinks. Thankyou"
Andrew Buchan, Partner, HLB Mann Judd: "I have told you a thousand times it's the best newsletter."
John Pearce, Chief Investment Officer, Unisuper: "Out of the (many many) investmentrelated emails I get, Cuffelinks is one that I always open."
Don Stammer, leading Australian economist: "Congratulations to all associated. It deserves the good following it has."
Reader: "The BEST in the game because of diversity and not aligned to financial products. Stands above all the noise."
Ian Kelly, CFP, BTACS Financial Services: "Probably the best source of commentary and information I have seen over the past 20 years."
Steve: "The best that comes into our world each week. This is the only one that is never, ever canned before fully being reviewed by yours truly."
Reader: "Keep it up - the independence is refreshing and is demonstrated by the variety of well credentialed commentators."
Reader: "It's excellent so please don't pollute the content with boring mainstream financial 'waffle' and adverts for stuff we don't want!"
Reader: "I subscribe to two newsletters. This is my first read of the week. Thank you. Excellent and please keep up the good work!"
Reader: "Best innovation I have seen whilst an investor for 25 years. The writers are brilliant. A great publication which I look forward to."
Reader: "An island of professionalism in an ocean of shallow self-interest. Well done!"
Reader: "Great resource. Cuffelinks is STILL the one and only weekly newsletter I regularly read."
Noel Whittaker, author and financial adviser: "A fabulous weekly newsletter that is packed full of independent financial advice."
Reader: "Love it, just keep doing what you are doing. It is the right length too, any longer and it might become a bit overwhelming."
Australian Investors Association: "Australia's foremost independent financial newsletter for professionals and self-directed investors."
Changes are expected in the superannuation rules in the Federal Budget 2016. Here we list a ‘Deficit Dozen’ of potential amendments.
Please take our simple survey on what you would change (not what you think will change). It will only take a minute or so.
We will publish the first results on Sunday 1 May 2016, two days before the Budget.
The survey is now closed.
The potential changes are:
Are there any other superannuation changes you think may be or should be introduced?
Yes - it is interesting to see what people think about the budget, and the budget is important. I look forward to the results but not as much as I look forward to government and superannuation industry really putting the consumer first.
Hi Stephen, you're correct this survey will have no impact on the Budget, but the fact that over 600 people have responded shows Cuffelinks' readers have an opinion and they want to express it. The comments provide a great insight into what people think about superannuation and possible changes. We will publish the results plus all the comments on Sunday and again in next week's newsletter. Cheers
Why are we spending time and energy on the 2016 Budget? Your survey is unlikely to change what the Government is going to do. We should be spending all this time and energy on the real issue: the fact that Australians are having to deal with the risks of retirement with very little assistance from the industry that should be doing just that - the superannuation industry.
Can anybody raise the issue of same superannuation rules applying to both politicians and common people at this coming election. Any party who promises to change the superannuation rules to politicians will get my vote (and a great majority of votes, I guess). Wow! Am I just a dreamer to expect politicians to act honestly when it comes to their remuneration and perks?
More lazy ill-conceived ideas are coming. So you think you are safe because of fumbling politicians asserting 'no changes being applied retrospectively'? With the last changes to old age pension rules, my then 77 yo sibling on part old age pension could only preserve the old asset test rules provided the super funded pension was never stopped and re-started after 31 December 2014. Effectively this change killed the concept of choice in superannuation provider, locking super provider arrangements as at 31 December 2014 unless willing to suffer the new asset test. Yes says the government, you can still exercise choice in super and escape the expensive for profit superannuation provider, but we will permanently penalise you for doing so. The same advisers and public servants who delivered that outcome will be looking for you in the May 2016 budget. Meanwhile… What is a reasonable after tax income in retirement, measured as a percentage of after tax income before retirement? Without access to the health benefits card, how much additional after tax income from super/investments is required to cover the additional health costs? How does a woman take time out of the paid workforce to raise the next generation of taxpayers and still achieve a reasonable retirement income from superannuation? The blunt rules for additionally taxing incomes over some arbitrary amount does not respect women with low superannuation balances that in later life are still trying to match the males.
Leave super alone. The tax benefits are the carrot required to persuade people to put their life savings into something they cannot touch for 50 years that is subject not only to market forces but the whim of the political ruling class for all those years. Successive govts have suckered working people into believing they need super as they individually don't have the discipline, desire or brains to save and invest for their lifetime in other financial structures not so tied to political will.
Agree with Sharon. Sick of parasitic politicians and public servants, with overly generous superannuation and other benefits provided at public expense, seeking to punish working Australians trying to provide their own retirement monies.
"Parasitic politicians and public servants"sums up the feeling of 80%of the general public.--Why should their superannuation entitlements be any greater than any other Australians.We should be all in the one boat!
Seems to me that the politicians who change the super rules should also obey and use the same super rules as the public. Also, seems to me that the politicians should be able to set the rules and leave them alone. Are they so incompetant that they have to keep changing the rules?
No wonder the black economy exists. Politicians from any party just can't be trusted.
There is no certainty i...and we need to be able to plan ahead...I have had to budget and live within my means...Governments want to get their hands on super and I don't agree with any cuts excep to the Polly Pension and the extras...try that for a start
Thanks for the great response already. Results and all comments published on Sunday night.
Bring back the Reasonable Benefits Limit (RBL). Tax payers should not be underwriting tax-sheltered luxury retirement or inheritance schemes
Add item 13: “tax-free (tax-payer funded) super fund income for life, tax-free (tax-payer funded) distributions for life, free (tax-payer funded) public transport for life, free (tax-payer funded) healthcare and medicines for life, free (tax-payer funded) utilities for life, plus a free slave for life.
To Gary M. I'll be the slave as long as I can play tennis at your place!
Superannuation is both a revenue source from taxes and a cost from concessions. The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) has released its first 'super explainer' and it shows how they think and perhaps future targets.
Among the share success stories is a poor personal experience as Telstra's service needs improving. Plus why the new budget announcements on downsizing and buying a home don't deserve the super hype.
A conversation with Government officials on the proposed super changes shows there is some logic behind those numbers.
The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.
Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.
Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise.
Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.
Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.
The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.
How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.
The US market has pummelled Australia's over the past 16 years and for good reason: it has some incredible businesses. Australia does too, but if you want to enjoy US-type returns, you need to know where to look.
As long as the banks have no desire to pay up for term deposit funding - which looks likely for a while yet - investors will continue to pay a premium for the higher yielding, but riskier hybrid instrument.
The rise of the Magnificent Seven and their large weighting in US indices has led to debate about concentration risk in markets. Whatever your view, the crowding into these stocks poses several challenges for global investors.
Money can bolster our joy in real ways. However, if we relentlessly chase wealth at the expense of other facets of well-being, history and science both teach us that it will lead to a hollowing out of life.
The copper market is barrelling towards a significant deficit and price surge over the next few decades that investors should not discount when looking at the potential for artificial intelligence and renewable energy.
Global REITs have been out of favour for some time. While office remains a concern, the rest of the sector is in good shape and offers compelling value, with many REITs trading below underlying asset replacement costs.