Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 481

Valuations still stretched in Australia’s housing market

Australian property market prices are falling, and rents are rising rapidly. Interest rates are rising even faster, and affordability statistics have diverged quite sharply between houses and units. The affordability of houses is as poor as it has ever been, and while the affordability of units is below average, it is nowhere near as bad as houses. This is likely reflecting:

  • a change in living preferences following the pandemic, and
  • the effect of lower population growth (particularly students) over the last few years.

In terms of mortgage payments, a 40%+ increase in one year is higher than any other time since the 1970s. The Reserve Bank has started to express some doubt over further rate rises, but the market is expecting another 1.25%+ of rate rises.

Affordability was already as poor as it had ever been in some markets before the rate rise, and housing valuation and affordability statistics worsened over September 2022. For investors, rental yields improved a little as rents rose while prices fell, but yields are still very low versus history, and interest rate rises would have swamped any gains for investors looking to borrow.

Markets are pricing in an extraordinary 7%+ mortgage rates over the next year. That would double the 2021 mortgage repayments for a 20% deposit mortgage. Given Australia has (a) the second most-indebted consumers in the world and (b) mostly variable interest rates, it seems unlikely that interest rates can rise that far without crashing the property market.

What are the limits to house prices?

Valuing the overall housing market is difficult given the rise in Australian house prices over the last 30 years, but there are limits. If house prices grow at 10% p.a. for the next 20 years, and wages/rents kept going up at their historical rates then:

  • The median Sydney house price would be over $7 million.
  • The median Sydney house price would be 45x higher than the median wage.
  • Even if you managed to scrape together the 5% deposit (only twice the median annual pre-tax salary) to qualify for a 95% mortgage, the mortgage payment would come in at almost 3x the median pre-tax salary.

That's not a realistic vision of society to me. There are a number of key inputs into housing valuation, but interest rates are the most important. Other limiting ratios are:

  • Mortgage payments to rent: comparing the cost of a mortgage with the cost of renting the same house. Using this ratio to constrain house prices, we assume that people will prefer to rent when the ratio gets high rather than buy.
  • Mortgage payments to wages: assuming when the ratio gets high, people rent because they cannot afford to buy.
  • Property prices to wages: assuming when the ratio gets high, people rent because they cannot save enough money to afford a deposit. We treat this as less important than the above two ratios.
  • Rental yield: Rental yield is the annual rent divided by the property price. By using this ratio to forecast prices, you are assuming when the ratio gets low, investors will not buy property as they are not getting a return that is high enough.

Detailed charts for the above locations can be found in the property detail update. For more on how and why we use these ratios see our residential real estate forecasting methodology.

Waiting for the effects of rate rises

CBA economist Gareth Aird has an apt analogy of the person at the bar who has just downed five shots in a row but doesn’t feel drunk yet. The effect is coming but it is delayed.

The delay is in four parts:

1. Delayed direct impact of rate rises. Typically rate rises take 2-3 months before affecting cash flow for a borrower. i.e. only 0.25-0.75% of recent increases have actually been felt by borrowers.

2. Delayed effect due to greater than usual concentration of fixed-rate mortgages. In March 2020, the Reserve Bank also introduced a facility where they lent directly to the banks at 0.1% for three years. This facility (and other market interventions) allowed banks to drop three-year fixed mortgages to around 2%. In response, fixed mortgages went from 10-15% of refinancing to over 40%. These will roll off, but in the interim, there are far more people who will be unaffected by the rate rises until they refinance.

3. Delayed indirect impact of rate rises. From the 3 months, for borrowers to actually notice and change spending patterns. For businesses that rely on consumer demand, it can take another few months before the effect flows through.

4. Delayed second-order and above effect. The economic multiplier compounds the effect for months going forward. i.e. consumers spend less on eating out which means that restauranteurs have less money to spend and then may lay off staff who also reduce spending. The effect of this echoes multiple times through the economy. Typical estimates suggest 1-2 years for changes in monetary policy to have the full effect.

The net impact is that the valuation ratios we have included in this report reflect the latest interest rate hikes announced by the central bank. The economic impacts, and the impact on house prices, are largely yet to come. When these factors are considered, we find that with higher interest rates, we need never-seen-before valuation ratios for house prices not to fall.

 

Damien Klassen is the Chief Investment Officer at Nucleus Wealth. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

6 Comments
Mark Hayden
October 30, 2022

Thanks Damien, there has been a lot of thought put into those ratios and metrics. This is one of those articles I will come back to and re-read. To me it paints a clear direction for the path - the challenge will be the distance and the timing.

Briza
October 27, 2022

My recent renovated house I was quoted $490,000 to build and replace my 20sq home. Land around here sells for about $700,000 for a 400sqm block. Real estate agents value house $900,000 to $1m. There comes a point when new homes can not be built for under $1m in desired areas so it puts a floor under how far prices can drop.

Jack
October 27, 2022

How about what's happening in the US?

"Mortgage rates topped 7% for the first time in 20 years, the latest milestone in a rapid climb that has all but paralyzed the housing market. The rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage averaged 7.08% this week, according to a survey of lenders by mortgage giant Freddie Mac. Just seven weeks ago, the rate was below 6%. A year ago it was just over 3%."

JH
October 27, 2022

Try 17 per cent when we bought in Mosman in 1992! Rates are still too low!! Interestingly read article on agent up here in Noosa Tom Offerman - he said he sold a house on Witta Circle Noosa on the water for $255k in 1992 now worth well over $15m! Vs our house in Mosman bought for $675k in the same year …..now worth a third of $15m? So what’s it prove - buy on the water and far away from jobs and stress?

Alex
October 27, 2022

Can't generalise too much, every house is different. At the moment, houses in good condition are holding up because they avoid shortage of labour and materials. Places that need work are the ones struggling.

SMSF Trustee
October 30, 2022

Alex, there's some truth in what you say, but don't push it too far. Most of the change in prices paid for established dwellings (which is after all what most of this sort of discussion is about) reflect changes in land value. It's quite possible to apply a general factor for land prices in each region - it's what the Valuer-General does all the time to give Councils a basis for setting local rates and the State revenue folks a basis for land tax calculations.
But, yes, even on a similar plot of land in the same area, different houses can perform differently. A 5 bedroom house will be more expensive than a 3 bedder, to state the obvious.
The specific situation you mention probably also holds true at the moment, but I see that as a very narrow situation that doesn't at all contradict the broad comments about whether house prices (a) are falling and (b) remain above some sort of 'fair value' level (in which case they are more likely to fall further than not). They are and they probably are would be the thrust of the article. What you've said doesn't contradict that.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Budget cash splash will do more harm than good

A housing market that I'd like to see

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.