Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 474

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 474 with weekend update

  •   8 September 2022
  • 16

The Weekend Edition includes a market update (after the editorial) plus Morningstar adds links to two highlights from the week.

While media attention focusses on the disquiet of borrowers facing rising interest rates, we overlook the investors who are enjoying a higher income flow on bonds and deposits. It is clear that a saver who earns 1% when inflation is 6% is going backwards by 5% in real terms. As interest rates rise, the same saver who now earns 4% will feel like their income has received a boost as it is covering more of the inflation impact. The pendulum seems to be swinging back to savers as interest rates rise.

But are the borrowers or savers winning from rising inflation and its impact on rates? It's commonly argued that governments can 'inflate away the debt' because they repay their maturing bonds with money that is worth less in future than when they borrowed it. In effect, the debt requires a smaller percentage of the government's revenue as inflation eats away at the value of the borrowing.

So far so good. But does the same apply for households?

Last week, a friend asked whether, as a borrower with a large mortgage, he should be happy to see high inflation. That is, does inflation 'inflate away his debt'? In theory, if wages increase in line with the CPI, he still owes the same amount of money but he earns more. My first instinct was to follow the traditional reasoning that high inflation benefits borrowers.

But here's the catch. He said that rising inflation is leading to higher interest rates on his mortgage, but his salary is not increasing to match CPI. So how can his debt be ‘inflated away’ when it is costing him more and he does not earn the salary to match it. In what sense is his debt becoming less? How can someone with a large debt be pleased by high inflation when all he sees is mortgage pain?

Good question. How have governments 'inflated away their debt' in the past but the same logic does not apply now for households? I put this question to Shane Oliver of AMP as my head was starting to spin. He replied: 

"Governments did inflate their way out of high debts left over from the end of World War 2 because post-war inflation combined with strong economic growth helped reduce the value of their debts relative to GDP. But that was a period of low bond yields. If bond yields had risen more in line with inflation, then governments would have found it a lot tougher.

It's harder for individuals. High inflation can help reduce a person's mortgage debt burden if interest rates stay low and wages growth is strong. This happened in the early part of the inflation surge in the first half of the 1970s when wages growth was well above inflation (in 1974 inflation rose to nearly 18% but wages growth was 25% or so) and interest rates were slow to move up with inflation. And back then, mortgage debt was relatively low (compared to people’s wages anyway). My parents benefitted in that period.

But right now we have the worst possible combination of high mortgage debt levels, rapidly rising interest rates and wages growth running well below the rate of inflation. Wages are nowhere near making up for the rise in interest payments on mortgages. So while the real value of the debt may be falling in the sense that consumer prices are rising faster than the value of the debt, it's not helping people with a mortgage due to slow wages growth.

So I don’t think the old concept of 'inflating the debt away' applies now to those with a mortgage."

What about savers in the current inflationary environment, and what is the comparison with the past? A recent chart produced for the US by JP Morgan is a guide, as reproduced below. In the 1980s, high inflation pushed the Fed to increase rates rapidly, and the chart shows savers earned higher interest rates (the grey bars) than the level of inflation. In the 1990s and even 2000s, deposit rates generally kept up with inflation.

But gradually, as bond rates fell after the GFC, the inflation rate exceeded bond yields. That was the position in both the US and Australia in the 2010s and into 2020 as Covid hit. Bond and bank deposit yields fell to close to zero. Real savings yields were negative as inflation exceeded savings rates.

Over the last four decades, therefore, we have experienced high inflation with high rates, low rates with low inflation, and now we have low but rising rates with high inflation. 

So which is best for households? For savers, it feels better to earn higher rates even if inflation is high. Retirees complained about 1% rates when inflation was 2% and probably prefer 4% rates when inflation is 6%. And borrowers are unhappy with rates at 4% when inflation is high rather than 2% when inflation is low, because wages are not growing to 'inflate their debt away'.

In the current inflationary conditions, it is the savers who feel better off than the mortgage holders.

On Tuesday this week, the Reserve Bank signalled more pain for borrowers:

"The Board expects to increase interest rates further over the months ahead, but it is not on a pre-set path ... The Board is committed to doing what is necessary to ensure that inflation in Australia returns to target over time."

The Governor of the Reserve Bank, Philip Lowe, also gave an address to the Anika Foundation on Inflation and the Monetary Policy Framework this week. Every time he speaks, the media dissects each word for a hint on future policy. The fact that such depth of analysis has been misleading in the past does not reduce the enthusiasm. Some analysts interpreted his latest speech as indicating rates had reached a 'neutral' zone and future increments will ease, say to 0.25% instead of 0.5%, but they are still going up. 

We have now experienced five consecutive months of rate increases: four of 0.5% and one of 0.25%. Each time, the news programmes trot out the usual stories of young couples with large mortgages who will need to buy frozen vegetables instead of fresh. They could run the same stories from months ago.

Who are the lenders and the borrowers, the winners and the losers? According to the ABS, the median age in Australia is 38.4 years, and:

  • People aged 20 to 44 years made up 37% of the combined capital city population, compared with 30% of the population in the rest of Australia.
  • People aged 55 years and over made up a smaller proportion of the population in capital cities (26%) than in the rest of Australia (34%).

Almost 80% of SMSF members are over 50 and their balances are far higher than for those under 50. About 75% of retirees own their home, and the desire of younger Australians to enjoy the Great Australian Dream shows little sign of abating. It's safe to generalise that younger people are the borrowers (or aspiring borrowers) and older people are the savers. Higher interest rates affect people differently depending on their resources, life stage and age, and we know from the Intergenerational Report that this chart will grow increasingly fat at the top (for example, 5% of Australians are expected to be over 85 by 2050).

Australian population by age and sex

The youngest members of the so-called Silent Generation (although many are far from silent) are 77, and with post-war frugality and home ownership, most are in the 80-100 years bracket where health, volunteering and estate management gain higher priority. Baby Boomers are currently aged between 58 and 76 and retiring in their thousands every week, and some are expecting to live another 30 years and prefer to live off income rather than capital. Home loans are either small or paid off.

We often overlook that the oldest of the Millennials - those young upstarts - are in their 40s, but many have large mortgages. This is the generation facing the major impact of rate rises on loans. They are the couples aged 26 to 41 that we see on the news when rates rise. And some of the freedom-loving, resourceful and independent Gen Xers can now retire, but many have mortgages, so there is a mix of fortunes in there.

One argument for the Reserve Bank continuing to increase rates is that levels of consumer confidence and spending remain high, and unemployment is at historical lows. In fact, Ross Gittins from The Sydney Morning Herald believes a tipping point has been reached where long-term unemployed have returned to the workforce and Australia will have a permanently lower unemployment rate. He wrote:

"By getting 125,000 long-term unemployed back into the working world, it’s lowered the floor under the unemployment rate by about 1 percentage point. So even if the economy turns down in coming months or years, the unemployment peak, however high, is likely to be about 1 percentage point lower than it otherwise would have been. It gets us closer to a level of full employment that makes more sense to an ordinary person who thinks full employment surely must mean unemployment close to zero."

Longer term, we need to challenge our assumptions of a return to low inflation in 2023 after a year of pain. Although the Reserve Bank still believes ...

"Inflation is expected to peak later this year and then decline back towards the 2–3% range. The expected moderation in inflation reflects the ongoing resolution of global supply-side problems, recent declines in some commodity prices and the impact of rising interest rates."

... there's another view, as Bernard Keane wrote in Crikey this week:

"Life is going to get a lot tougher for central bankers as climate change, worker shortages, pandemics, geopolitical instability and the growing use of sanctions create constant inflationary pressures on economies."

In this week's edition ...

Lisa Thompson and four of her colleagues from Capital Group draw on the lessons from a combined 171 years in the market, through bulls and bears, to highlight key takeaways on lessons learnt.

Our interview this week is with Andrew Swan from the Man Group, who is also a multi-decade investor now specialising in Asian equities. Most Australians are underweight Asian stocks but there are growing opportunities when developed economies are facing economic and demographic headwinds.

At the conclusion of the reporting season, it's more important to identify emerging themes than the short-term results from a few companies. Daniel Moore and Michael O'Neill from Investors Mutual identify three major trends all investors should know.

Steve Johnson of Forager has always been known as a value manager, looking for unloved stocks trading at an estimate of a discount to fair value. So now that one-third of his portfolio is in growth, has he changed his style?

Charlie Jamieson invests in the top end of the bond market in government securities, where finally after years of low rates, some value has appeared. He checks the prospects using scenario analysis with variations around his base case.

It's certainly been a wild ride in bonds with the AusBond Composite index down another -2.5% in August, taking the drawdown above 12%. It's even worse for some global investors, with the hedged Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index down 11% since its peak on 4 January 2021, but the unhedged index has lost around 20%. For any investor thinking that the time to buy in a market is after a selloff, it's worth checking bonds.

Source: BondAdvisor

Regular readers will be familiar with Peter Thornhill's views on dividends from industrial companies, so how does he react to the massive payouts from resource stocks? He checks the numbers.

And the CEO of the Grattan Institute, Danielle Wood, received much acclaim last week at the Jobs and Skills Summit for her opening keynote address and how she set the tone for the event. We publish one of the section highlights plus links to the entire talk as a good summary of the issues facing Australia.

Two additional articles from Morningstar for the weekend. Christine St Anne discusses the outlook for dividends with stock analysts, while Nicola Chand reports on expectations that the strong GDP results will soon show signs of easing

Finally, as we head into spring and summer, spare a thought for the Europeans about to face a winter with soaring electricity and gas prices. It will become a massive social problem. The Irish Times quoted a cafe owner hit by an electricity bill up 250% in a year to €9,836.92 for 73 days. That is a lot of cappuccinos.  

Our White Paper this week is from Neuberger Berman, with a fascinating perspective on the development and rapid growth of private markets. Much in the news recently as Australian super funds increasingly rely on unlisted investments, it's also attracting far more retail interest.

For those who read Firstlinks and then don't return for another week, there are often fascinating comments on our articles. No exception are the 60 or so comments on That Horse Has Bolted and they're worth another look. 

Graham Hand

Weekend market update

In the US on Friday, equity markets closed higher, breaking a three-week losing run. The benchmark S&P500 rose 1.5% but is still off its levels of a month ago, while NASDAQ continued the renewed confidence in tech with a further rise of 2.1%.

From AAP Netdesk: The local share market snapped its two-week losing streak thanks in part to the mining sector, which bounced back from its worst week in two years. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index on Friday closed up 45 points, or 0.7%, to 6894.2. For the week, the index finished up 65 points, or about 1%, for its first winning week since August 15-19.

The mining sector was the top performer on Friday, up 3.3% as Mineral Resources, Fortescue Metals and BHP made strong gains. Mineral Resources rocketed 13.6% to an all-time high of $71.51 after The Australian Financial Review reported the mining services company was considering spinning off its lithium business. Fortescue Metals had its best day since April 28, rising 6.1% while BHP added 3.2% and Rio Tinto advanced 2.7%.

The energy sector also saw a recovery, rising 1.1% after the price of oil rebounded overnight to $US89 a barrel. Woodside Energy increased 1.3% to $32.52 and Santos added 1.0% to $7.85. 

The big four banks also saw some increases with Westpac adding 0.4% to $21.25, ANZ growing 0.5% to $23.02, NAB up 0.8% to $29.85, and CBA adding 0.3% to $95.53. Tech grew for the fourth consecutive day, adding 0.5%. Tyro gained another 9.5% while Wisetech Global gained 2.5%, the logistics platform's first-ever close above $60.

Six of the ASX's 11 sectors finished lower, however, with consumer staples lagging the most, by 1.25%. Both major supermarkets recorded losses, with Woolworths down 1.6% and Coles falling 1.2%.

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

Morningstar Investment Conference for Individual Investors is on Thursday 13 October 2022. Register here for in-person or digital attendance. Use the code MICII_FL for an 80%+ discount for Firstlinks readers.

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Indicative Listed Investment Company (LIC) NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC (LMI) Monthly Review from Independent Investment Research

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website


C (the other one)
September 13, 2022

Hi Graham and all, I have been investing in shares for more than 20 years but never bought bonds. What is the easiest way to buy bonds and bank hybrids in Australia? I understand you are not providing financial advice and I qualify as a wholesale client and am fully responsible for my one choice. Thanks.

September 10, 2022

With the cash rate so low for so long, why is it that most commentators constantly refer to the Term Deposit or Savings rates as the only miserable return for income seekers. ? Even before the recent increases in the cash rate there were investment grade bonds with maturities of only a few years that paid around 3.5% to 4% pa. The risk factor is minimal and many such bonds can be bought with about $10,000. Commentators need to widen their comparison scope.

Graham Hand
September 10, 2022

Well, Charles, on "Commentators need to widen their comparison scope." ... you need to widen your reading scope. I have been writing about this for a long time. For example:

September 11, 2022

Apologies to you Graham, but I suggest you are the exception. The mass media commentators don't go beyond bank TDs

September 12, 2022

"mass media commentators don't go beyond bank TDs":

TDs, and covered bonds, are the highest grade of bond - capital guaranteed by Bank, Law and Government.

The majority of the public would be at a disadvantage when selecting lesser grade bonds.

In a market not repressed by central banks or governments, TDs yield well relative to the risk.

SMSF Trustee
September 10, 2022

Charles, some examples please. Short term IG bonds were not paying 3-4% until very recently. More like 1-2%.

September 10, 2022

"More like 1-2%":
... and the prices dropped ~15% / y:

SMSF Trustee
September 11, 2022

Dudley that can't be right either. Short term bond prices could not drop that much. Only long term bonds have the duration to move that much in price on a 1-2% increase in yield.

September 11, 2022

"Short term bond prices could not drop that much.": Nor yield so much.

September 10, 2022

Hi Graham,
Looks like " The Horse Has Bolted" has won the comments race for the year..
I wonder if the tax incentives were not inside Superanuation Funds, would they be as popular with the people who realy do not need a Super Fund. This is where the "greed" comes into play.
As i have been an average wage(we all have different opinion on that amount) worker all my life, i believe in the KISS rule (Keep It Simple Stupid) so people do not get mislead by the spin doctors, that does include "Super Funds" themselves....Paying for a Financial Adviser is costly, but "good advice doesn't cost----it pays" this means so much for the average worker over time..
The amount of money in some Superannuation (SMSF included) is incomprehensible for most people... Limit the amount of $ in Super Funds and take away the greed..Super was brought into play for the workers who really need it in their Retirement..

September 10, 2022

Hi Steve .S !.............You say : "I wonder if the tax incentives were not inside Superannuation Funds, would they be as popular with the people who really do not need a Super Fund. This is where the "greed" comes into play." Likewise , you say : "As i have been an average wage(we all have different opinion on that amount) worker all my life,....." My reply Steve is "Wonder no more" ! You have literally answered your own questions ! Of course the tax incentives make Superannuation attractive.....if not......people would continue to invest elsewhere as they did previously.....and those vast sums of money would be used for different purposes other than those chosen by the "Super Funds" privately owned housing , land , the share market , precious metals and jewels , art etc. As you also say :"we all have different opinion on that amount". Ambition and success drive people differently. If you are content with being an "average wage worker" then that is fine. If you want "better" than that, then it is up to you to decide to "do something to earn or create more wealth for yourself". Otherwise, stay as you are!? 

September 10, 2022

An interesting aspect of the graph is the proportion of residence in capital cities changes from the 50years cohort up. It matches observation in that migration of the retirees to QLD and other areas for lifestyle reasons is increasing. In QLD, there were jokes about the Gold Coast and Noosa being full of Victorians. They can sell their capital city homes for a huge differential, and move to cheaper, more convivial areas. This is causing a lot of the price increases we’ve seen in rural areas like NSW North Coast, and parts of QLD. The downside is that the health, community and other services can’t get workers who can’t afford the accommodation, and are facing increasing numbers of users.
I would expect to see the same pattern over the next few decades, but with a twist. As more of them die, the rural real estate values will flatten with demand falling off…. and a corresponding decline in the ability of state and local government to sustain the buildup of services.
Demography, as the Chinese are finding out makes for interesting times….

Peter S
September 08, 2022

Graham, Thoroughly enjoyed your welcome note today.

September 08, 2022

Kind of wondering why I have stopped receiving the email notification for the newsletter? Have you changed your systems? Don't want to miss anything, read every week.

Graham Hand
September 08, 2022

Hi Stephen, we will look into it, nothing has changed at our end. G

September 07, 2022

So I understand inflation will not inflate away my debt if my wages don't match CPI, but what if they do?


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever

In his recent shareholder letter, Warren Buffett mentions several stocks he expects Berkshire Hathaway will own indefinitely, including Occidental Petroleum. We look at ASX stocks that investors could buy and hold forever.

The best strategy to build income for life

Owning quality, dividend-producing industrial shares is key to building a decent income stream. Here is an update on the long-term performance of industrial stocks against indices, listed property, and term deposits.

Are more taxes on super on the cards?

The Government's broken promise on tax cuts has prompted speculation about other promises that it may consider breaking. It's widely believed that super is lightly taxed and a prime candidate for special attention.

Lessons from the battery metals bust

The crash in lithium and nickel prices has left companies scrambling to cut production, billionaires red-faced, and investors wondering how a ‘sure thing’ went so wrong. There are plenty of lessons for everyone.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 545 with weekend update

It’s troubling that practical skills like investing aren’t taught at schools as it leaves our children ill-equipped to build wealth, and more vulnerable to bad advice. Here are some suggestions to address the issue.

  • 1 February 2024

For the younger generation, we need to get real on tax

The distortions in our tax system have been ignored for too long, and we're now paying the price. It's time Australia got real and addressed the problems to prevent an even greater intergenerational tragedy.

Latest Updates


16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever

In his recent shareholder letter, Warren Buffett mentions several stocks he expects Berkshire Hathaway will own indefinitely, including Occidental Petroleum. We look at ASX stocks that investors could buy and hold forever.

Investment strategies

Clime time: 10 charts on the outlook for major asset classes

The charts reveal that interest rates can't rise much further as Australian mortgage holders are under stress, bank dividends look solid, and the bond market is in flux because yields are being manipulated.


Phasing out cheques, and what will happen to cash?

Cheques and bank service, or the lack of, were major topics when I addressed a seniors’ group recently. The word had got out that the government was phasing out cheques, and many in the audience were feeling abandoned.


What financial risks do retirees face?

Treasury's consultation into the retirement phase of superannuation is generating a lot of interest. This submission to the consultation outlines the key financial risks to an individual’s standard of living in retirement.


Recession surprise may be in store for the US stock market

Markets are partying like it's 1999, but history suggests that US earnings and economic growth are vulnerable following an interest rate tightening cycle. Investors should prepare their portfolios accordingly.

Investment strategies

3 under the radar investment opportunities

The Magnificent Seven are hogging the headlines, yet there are plenty of growth opportunities elsewhere, at a fraction of the cost. Here are three stock ideas riding key areas of structural and cyclical change.


Why a quant approach can thrive in the age of passive investing

The rise of passive investing is unlikely to derail the value of quantitative strategies. Passive investing hasn’t eradicated the irrationality of crowds, leaving pockets of opportunity to outperform indices.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.