Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 382

Why tech companies trade at a premium

Compared to the US, where technology stocks are now the largest sector of the S&P500 at 27% of the index, Australia has a small tech component. Despite this, Australian businesses also face significant tech disruption, often by companies not traditionally associated with ‘tech’, such as Steadfast (ASX:SDF), James Hardie (ASX:JHX), CSL (ASX:CSL), Resmed (ASX:RMD) and REA Group (ASX:REA).

Many companies are using tech to disrupt competitors, and with intellectual property investment only 2% of Australia’s GDP compared to 5% in the US, as shown in Figure 1, tech disruption has barely started on a long journey.

Figure 1: IP investment remains much lower in Australia than in the United States

An innovative way to measure tech disruption

Equity analysts at UBS Securities in Australia embarked on innovative research to measure tech disruption. They were asked to rate which stocks are most effective in using data and technology relative to peers in their sector. They also checked which stocks use tech phrases in their stock exchange updates, including references to artificial intelligence, machine learning, natural language, deep learning and predictive analysis. UBS reports:

"Appen, Telstra, Insurance Australia Group, PRO Medicus, Seek, ASX, Flight Centre, QBE Insurance and Xero mentioned these phrases at least 100 times over the past five years."

Overall, they found that stocks identified as tech focused had Price/Earnings ratios (P/Es) that were significantly higher than their peers. UBS then back-tested to show that stocks with high tech disruption scores outperformed stocks with low disruption scores by an annualised 14% since the start of 2016.

Table 1 shows the identified companies and their tech disruption and tech mention scores. 

Table 1: Key growth names

Tech stocks which UBS likes include Appen, NextDC, Nanosonics, and REA. Non-tech stocks with a high-tech disruption score or lagging share prices include Aristocrat Leisure, CSL, ResMed, James Hardie, Breville and Steadfast Group. UBS thinks Altium and Magellan are worth watching, all listed above.

Tech disruption explains Growth outperforming Value

UBS also finds that tech disruption is contributing to the ongoing outperformance of Growth over Value stocks, which is a major issue for fund managers who have built their businesses on identifying 'Value' (or companies trading at below their fundamental values). The increase in the valuation gap between high and low PE stocks has, in part, been justified by high PE stocks producing significantly higher earnings growth than their low PE counterparts, as shown in Figure 2. Tech companies are usually Growth stocks.

Figure 2: Earnings of ASX200 growth stocks versus value stocks since 2007

Since the start of 2007, earnings of growth firms have nearly doubled, while earnings of value stocks have halved. The high growth firms justify higher multiples due to their higher earnings growth. The earnings of tech disrupters have also consistently grown faster than tech laggards since 2016 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Tech disrupters EPS relative to tech laggards

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and benefit from lower rates

UBS has also written notes on how ultra-low rates are having a major impact on the prices of Australian equities:

"An additional insight from those notes is that a lower risk-free rate means that long-dated future cash flows matter more than near-term cash flows in a discounted cash-flow framework. Put differently, the terminal value component accounts for a greater proportion of the value of the equity. Growth stocks are longer duration assets (more cash flows in the future). Value stocks are shorter duration assets (less cash flows in the future).

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and therefore benefit from lower rates due to their duration. Lower rates also mean that tech disruptors are able to finance technology at lower cost and take a longer-term view on tech-related projects. Lower overall market EPS growth is also positive for tech disruptors and other Growth stocks due to the scarcity premium that they command."

Figure 4 highlights the decade of Growth outperforming Value.

Figure 4: Growth outperforming Value since the GFC

 

In a note of optimism that investing is not only a tech story, UBS also notes:

"High quality industrials that are able to maintain solid earnings growth in a low interest rate environment are likely to outperform." 

The market is also seeing larger stock-specific price reactions to news events, as so much of the price is determined by long-term expectations. Either a threat to or affirmation of this future potential sends investors to buy and sell and the market catches the momentum. The potential for long-term durable competitive advantages is especially valued.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article draws on the work of Pieter Stoltz, Jim Xu and Paul Winter, Equity Analysts at UBS Securities. This article contains general information only and does not constitute personal financial product advice. It does not consider any investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

More articles and papers from UBS, a sponsor of Firstlinks, can be found here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why August company reporting season was poor

How we have invested during COVID-19

Stocks near their 52-week lows: is it time to reconsider?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.