Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 609

Should America follow Australia with a sovereign wealth fund?

If reports are correct that former Morgan Stanley technology banker Michael Grimes is set to lead President Trump’s planned U.S. sovereign wealth fund, or SWF, the administration has chosen a highly credentialled and qualified candidate. But that doesn’t make an SWF a good idea. On the contrary, such a fund would pose significant economic risks to American taxpayers and voters and would give future presidents - Democratic and Republican - unprecedented control over the U.S. economy and federal budget.

The US as an atypical candidate

America is about as far from the prototypical SWF nation as a country can be. Most countries with SWFs are smaller nations with substantial fiscal reserves such as Norway, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates. The U.S. has the world’s largest economy with large annual federal deficits and a national debt approaching $40 trillion - about $100,000 a person.

It’s always difficult to fund an SWF and generate consistent returns, but all the more so for a nation burdened by such large budgetary issues. An SWF will be effectively debt-financed so long as the U.S. is running large deficits. All money is fungible. Even if Washington ostensibly funds an SWF with revenue from taxes or tariffs, it comes at the cost of more debt because the U.S. government doesn’t have a budget surplus to invest. This would make an SWF the economic equivalent of a leveraged hedge fund. To generate positive returns for Americans, it would have to achieve sustained risk-adjusted returns exceeding the government’s borrowing rate. That would be exceptionally difficult, especially over the medium and long term.

An American SWF would distort markets and invite political interference. Governments have a poor record of picking economic winners, as seen in failed investments like Solyndra and Fisker Automotive. Government investment funds also tend to drift beyond their original mandates due to misaligned incentives. A prime example is Australia’s Future Fund.

Australia is a red flag

Established in 2006 to finance the country’s unfunded public pension liabilities by 2020, the Future Fund has yet to allocate a single dollar for this purpose and is unlikely to do so any time soon. The fund either reinvests its returns or spends it on remarkable administrative costs. The fund’s staff includes four people who in fiscal 2023-24 made more than a million Australian dollars a year. Meanwhile, government pension liabilities continue to burden taxpayers, costing billions annually while Australia’s government debt keeps rising.

Although the Future Fund’s returns have generally exceeded borrowing costs, they have lagged behind private counterparts; more so when accounting for the fact that being government-owned exempts the Future Fund from taxes other funds have to pay. Australian taxpayers would have been better off with lower taxes and the freedom to invest or consume as they saw fit.

The flawed justification for keeping the Future Fund even as debt continues to accrue is the mistaken belief that it generates 'free money'. Proponents argue that as long as returns exceed borrowing costs, the fund should continue indefinitely. By that logic, the U.S. government could simply borrow trillions, invest the money, and eliminate taxation altogether. But money is never free and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. If returns are insufficient, taxpayers will be significantly worse off.

The greatest danger of an SWF is political interference and cronyism. The Future Fund is Australia’s third-largest investment fund when measured in total assets. This affects asset prices and distorts markets. An American SWF would be even more distortive, potentially becoming the world’s largest institutional investor. This would give the federal government enormous leverage over domestic and global markets, enabling it to manipulate markets, businesses and investments.

Politicians have already attempted this in Australia. The Labor government recently attempted to alter the Future Fund’s investment mandate to ensure that it 'must' have regard for government priorities. Such changes would affect investment decisions and influence the corporate governance and strategic direction of private companies in which the fund has invested.

A political plaything?

If BlackRock’s ESG focus is controversial, imagine the potential for politicians to use an American SWF as a political tool. Even if this now appeals to some Republicans, they should picture what it would mean under a Democratic administration. The rapid fluctuations in mandates alone would cause dangerous market instability and uncertainty. Every four years could bring new demands, leaving investors and businesses with limited ability to make medium- or long-term plans.

A president who can leverage the government’s balance sheet strategically to influence private businesses would circumvent congressional authority and further expand executive power. And it would undermine the constitutional separation of powers by weakening Congress’s exclusive control over federal spending.

In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton stressed that the president shouldn’t have unilateral control over commerce or the economy. Establishing a U.S. sovereign wealth fund would represent a dramatic shift from this principle, granting the president a previously unimagined authority more akin to that of a monarch - an outcome America’s Founding Fathers never intended.

 

Dimitri Burshtein is a principal at Eminence Advisory.

 

  •   30 April 2025
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The 2020 US presidential elections

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Latest Updates

A speech from the Prime Minister on fixing housing

“Fellow Australians, I want to address our most pressing national issue: housing. For too long, governments have tiptoed around problems from escalating prices, but for the sake of our younger generations, that stops today.”        

Taxation

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

Exchange traded products

Multiple ways to win

Both active and passive investing can work, but active investment doesn’t in the way it is practised by many fund managers and passive investing doesn’t work in the way most end investors practise it. Here’s a better way.

Economy

The Future Fund may become a 'bad bank' for problem home loans

The Future Fund says it will not be paying defined benefit pensions until at least 2033 - raising as many questions as answers. This points to an increasingly uncertain future for Australia's sovereign wealth fund.

Investment strategies

Managed accounts and the future of portfolio construction

With $233 billion under management, managed accounts are evolving into diversified, transparent, and liquid investment frameworks. The rise of ETFs and private markets marks a shift in portfolio design and discipline. 

Property

Commercial property prospects are looking up

Commercial property is seeing the same supply issues as the residential market. Given the chronic undersupply and a recent pickup in demand, it bodes well for an upturn in commercial real estate prices.

Infrastructure

Private toll roads need a shake-up

Privatised toll roads in Australia help governments avoid upfront costs but often push financial risks onto taxpayers while creating monopolies and unfair toll burdens for commuters and businesses.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.