Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 60

Status, longevity and the age pension

Policy makers seem to overlook the fact that people of higher socio-economic status have longer life times. Unfortunately, there is little data from Australia to study this effect. It requires greater study considering the impact on financial planning for the high socio-economic client and the topical issue of increasing the age pension entitlement age.

Socio-economic status

Until 2005, the UK Office of Statistics published separate mortality tables every five years for six different occupational classifications. This is the best public mortality data set available at a national level related to socio-economic status. The classifications range from Class 1 (‘Professional’) to Class V (‘Unskilled’). The difference in average life expectancy from age 65 for these two classifications was 4.2 years for males and 4.3 years for females in the 2005 data. Since the first data in 1976, life expectancy increased more for higher status than for lower status.

There are a range of possible explanations. Unskilled occupations may have involved greater risk and lead to health problems in later life. Professionals may have developed better diet and health care habits that extend into later life. However there are deeper dimensions and career experiences within occupations.

Someone who has studied these deeper dimensions is Sir Michael Marmot. Originally from Australia where he graduated in medicine in 1968, he became an international expert in longitudinal studies of health and longevity. His book, ‘Status Syndrome’, published in 2004, is a comprehensive coverage of his work in a field that might be labelled psychosocial effects on health and longevity. My conclusions from Marmot’s work are that whilst health status and income are significant determinants of longevity, differences in longevity in later life are also due to the level of autonomy and engagement people have enjoyed in their careers.

A first implication of these conclusions is that financial planners lucky enough to capture clients with these fortunate career attributes as well as financial self sufficiency, need to factor in a substantially longer life time (and future improvement) than population averages.

A second implication relates to how age pension policy is being managed. In current public debate it is an easy logic to argue something like “since the age pension started in 1909, average life expectancy has increased by 25 years so we need to keep updating the age pension entitlement age”. Average life expectancy is a neat tool for this argument; however it ignores the dimensions around this average of people with different status.

For example, women now in their 50’s and 60’s who through child rearing and divorce may have had little opportunity to enjoy autonomous and engaging careers may have little in the way of superannuation and financial assets. Waiting until age 67 or 70 for the age pension, with limited employment opportunities and below subsistence unemployment benefits, is not a satisfactory situation. Similar arguments could be applied to manual workers who physically struggle to continue occupations past age 60.

A more sophisticated approach

A better approach to age pension reform than just increasing the eligibility age for all would be to apply a more sophisticated status and financial means test from say age 60. This could be blended proportionately with a different status and means test applying fully from say age 80. Full pension rates might be different in the age 60 and 80 formulae. This approach could accommodate full inclusion of home value and (non-annuitised) superannuation assets with greater public acceptance. Let’s stop treating people as if they’re all the same when they reach age 70.

Editor’s Note: For additional material on this subject from the Wall Street Journal, 18 April 2014, see ‘The Richer You Are, the Older You’ll Get.’


Bruce Gregor is an actuary and demographic researcher at Financial Demographics and established the website


A brighter view of dependency ratios

Longevity awareness and the three pillars

Making judgments based on age


Most viewed in recent weeks

After 30 years of investing, I prefer to skip this party

Eventually, prices become so extreme they bear no relationship to reality, and a bubble forms. I believe we are there today, not for all stocks but for many in the technology space.

Australian house prices: Part 2, the bigger picture

There is good reason to believe the negatives will continue to outweigh the positives over the next 12 to 18 months. There is more concern about house prices than the short-term indicators suggest.

How to handle the riskiest company results in history

It is better to miss a results bounce and buy after the company has delivered than it is to step on a landmine. With such uncertainty, avoid FOMO by following these result season investing tips.

Australian house prices: Part 1, how worried should we be?

Three key indicators are useful for predicting the short-term outlook for house prices, although tighter lockdowns make the outlook gloomier. There is enough doubt to create cause for concern.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 369

Imagine you had perfect foresight about COVID-19 at the start of the year. You correctly foresaw that the global pandemic would kill over 700,000 among 20 million infections by August. In Australia, borders would close, cities would be locked down, most mortgagors would be on income support and companies would be allowed to trade while insolvent. You then had to guess how much the stock market would fall. Would you say about 10%?

  • 6 August 2020

The rise of Afterpay and emergence of a new business model

Sometimes the simplest ideas are the best. The founders of Afterpay stumbled on the attraction for consumers of paying by instalments, and now retailers must offer the facility or lose business.

Latest Updates


The 'Heady Hundred' case for unglamorous growth

Checking global stocks with higher prices than the FANGAM stocks but weaker margins and growth identified almost 100 companies. Astonishingly, the ‘Heady Hundred’ are valued at over US$3 trillion.


Share Purchase Plans brickbats and bouquets

Many Share Purchase Plans leave large gains on the table for institutions, but some companies are handling them more equitably. As a shareholder, check if your company receives a pass or a fail.


Three things we have learnt about listed companies in 2020

Many companies have strengthened their balance sheets but their soundness can be directly correlated to the duration of the pandemic. What lessons has 2020 revealed coming into reporting season?

Investment strategies

What does the 'fear gauge' VIX really mean?

The VIX as a measure of risk has a place in equity markets in interpreting market sentiment, but it is overly simplistic to think it can represent volatility in equities as a whole. Just what is it?


Where we see growth opportunities in software stocks

Financial software companies have favourable attributes and industry tailwinds that may see investors rewarded, especially with super funds driving for greater efficiencies and better member experiences.


Five ways to use the family home for retirement income

The family home is the bedrock on which many retirement plans sit, with special tax and social security benefits. Many products generate an income stream from the home to make retirement more comfortable.



© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.