Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 382

Why tech companies trade at a premium

Compared to the US, where technology stocks are now the largest sector of the S&P500 at 27% of the index, Australia has a small tech component. Despite this, Australian businesses also face significant tech disruption, often by companies not traditionally associated with ‘tech’, such as Steadfast (ASX:SDF), James Hardie (ASX:JHX), CSL (ASX:CSL), Resmed (ASX:RMD) and REA Group (ASX:REA).

Many companies are using tech to disrupt competitors, and with intellectual property investment only 2% of Australia’s GDP compared to 5% in the US, as shown in Figure 1, tech disruption has barely started on a long journey.

Figure 1: IP investment remains much lower in Australia than in the United States

An innovative way to measure tech disruption

Equity analysts at UBS Securities in Australia embarked on innovative research to measure tech disruption. They were asked to rate which stocks are most effective in using data and technology relative to peers in their sector. They also checked which stocks use tech phrases in their stock exchange updates, including references to artificial intelligence, machine learning, natural language, deep learning and predictive analysis. UBS reports:

"Appen, Telstra, Insurance Australia Group, PRO Medicus, Seek, ASX, Flight Centre, QBE Insurance and Xero mentioned these phrases at least 100 times over the past five years."

Overall, they found that stocks identified as tech focused had Price/Earnings ratios (P/Es) that were significantly higher than their peers. UBS then back-tested to show that stocks with high tech disruption scores outperformed stocks with low disruption scores by an annualised 14% since the start of 2016.

Table 1 shows the identified companies and their tech disruption and tech mention scores. 

Table 1: Key growth names

Tech stocks which UBS likes include Appen, NextDC, Nanosonics, and REA. Non-tech stocks with a high-tech disruption score or lagging share prices include Aristocrat Leisure, CSL, ResMed, James Hardie, Breville and Steadfast Group. UBS thinks Altium and Magellan are worth watching, all listed above.

Tech disruption explains Growth outperforming Value

UBS also finds that tech disruption is contributing to the ongoing outperformance of Growth over Value stocks, which is a major issue for fund managers who have built their businesses on identifying 'Value' (or companies trading at below their fundamental values). The increase in the valuation gap between high and low PE stocks has, in part, been justified by high PE stocks producing significantly higher earnings growth than their low PE counterparts, as shown in Figure 2. Tech companies are usually Growth stocks.

Figure 2: Earnings of ASX200 growth stocks versus value stocks since 2007

Since the start of 2007, earnings of growth firms have nearly doubled, while earnings of value stocks have halved. The high growth firms justify higher multiples due to their higher earnings growth. The earnings of tech disrupters have also consistently grown faster than tech laggards since 2016 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Tech disrupters EPS relative to tech laggards

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and benefit from lower rates

UBS has also written notes on how ultra-low rates are having a major impact on the prices of Australian equities:

"An additional insight from those notes is that a lower risk-free rate means that long-dated future cash flows matter more than near-term cash flows in a discounted cash-flow framework. Put differently, the terminal value component accounts for a greater proportion of the value of the equity. Growth stocks are longer duration assets (more cash flows in the future). Value stocks are shorter duration assets (less cash flows in the future).

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and therefore benefit from lower rates due to their duration. Lower rates also mean that tech disruptors are able to finance technology at lower cost and take a longer-term view on tech-related projects. Lower overall market EPS growth is also positive for tech disruptors and other Growth stocks due to the scarcity premium that they command."

Figure 4 highlights the decade of Growth outperforming Value.

Figure 4: Growth outperforming Value since the GFC

 

In a note of optimism that investing is not only a tech story, UBS also notes:

"High quality industrials that are able to maintain solid earnings growth in a low interest rate environment are likely to outperform." 

The market is also seeing larger stock-specific price reactions to news events, as so much of the price is determined by long-term expectations. Either a threat to or affirmation of this future potential sends investors to buy and sell and the market catches the momentum. The potential for long-term durable competitive advantages is especially valued.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article draws on the work of Pieter Stoltz, Jim Xu and Paul Winter, Equity Analysts at UBS Securities. This article contains general information only and does not constitute personal financial product advice. It does not consider any investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

More articles and papers from UBS, a sponsor of Firstlinks, can be found here.

 

UBS

RELATED ARTICLES

Why August company reporting season was poor

How we have invested during COVID-19

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Five ways the Retirement Review points to new policies

The Retirement Income Review goes much further than an innocent-sounding 'fact base', and is sure to guide policies in the run up to the next election. It will change how we think about retirement incomes.

Graeme Shaw on why investing is at a pivotal moment

Company profits have not improved for many years but higher valuations have been driven by falling rates and excess liquidity. Conditions do not suit a value and contrarian manager but here are some opportunities.

Retirement Review gives strong views on hoarding of super

The Review includes some profound findings, most notable that retirement income should include drawing down far more capital. Expect post-retirement products to proliferate under a Retirement Income Covenant.

11 key findings on retirement dreams during the pandemic

A mid-pandemic survey of over 1,000 people near or in retirement found three in four are not confident how long their money will last. Only 18% felt their money was safe during a strong economic downturn.

Bank scorecard 2020: when will the mojo return?

Banks severely cut dividends in 2020 but are expected to improve payments in 2021. History provides clues to when the banks will return to their 2019 levels of profitability, but who is positioned the best?

Generational wealth transfers will affect all investors

It's not only that 60 is the new 40, but 80 is the new 60. Many Baby Boomers spend up in retirement and are less inclined to leave a nest egg to their children. The ways wealth transfers will affect all investors.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Five ways the Retirement Review points to new policies

The Retirement Income Review goes much further than an innocent-sounding 'fact base', and is sure to guide policies in the run up to the next election. It will change how we think about retirement incomes.

Property

Steve Bennett on investing in direct property for the long term

As people stayed home during the pandemic, a bearish view swept over most property sectors, but many have thrived and prices have recovered rapidly. The best opportunities are in long leases with quality tenants.

Retirement

Retirement Review gives strong views on hoarding of super

The Review includes some profound findings, most notable that retirement income should include drawing down far more capital. Expect post-retirement products to proliferate under a Retirement Income Covenant.

Superannuation

Paul Keating on why super relies on “not draining the bath”

Paul Keating is the champion of compulsory superannuation as the central means of funding retirement. In the wake of the Retirement Income Review, he is at his passionate best defending the system, with Leigh Sales.

Latest from Morningstar

Is your portfolio too heavy on technology stocks?

Investors with heavy allocations to a broad US index should check how much is exposed to tech stocks, especially when valuations look a bit steep. It might be time to reallocate to other sectors or styles.

Investment strategies

Beware of burning down the barn to bury the debt

At some point, policymakers will turn to the task of deleveraging, to work off massive debt burdens built up during the pandemic. Australia is already ticking the boxes on many policies used in the past.

Superannuation

New bankruptcy rules may have a domino impact on SMSF pensions

During COVID, bankruptcy rules have allowed small businesses to trade while insolvent. It may mean an SMSF is hit by the collapse of a business leaving trustees struggling to meet their own legal obligations.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.