Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Beware the headache when the QE party ends

Studying financial markets over time can reveal interesting insights into the way investors think and behave. Renowned academics, Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton from the London Business School, in their article, ‘The Real Value Of Money’, produced a longitudinal study, examining how equities and bonds have performed under different inflation regimes over 112 years and in 19 different countries. It’s fascinating. In 2012 (and arguably today), investors were willing to buy sovereign bonds that were expected to produce negative real yields, regarding them as ‘safe’.

Inflationary expectations play a major role in long bond yields, and the above study argues that prevailing wage growth is the key determinant in these expectations. I believe the globalisation of manufacturing, technological advances leading to productivity gains, and reduced unionisation in workforce percentage terms have led to weakened bargaining power of labour in western economies.

In my previous Cuffelinks article, ‘Premature talk of bubble trouble’, I described the germinating seeds of a bubble forming in both equities and property. I also referred to some individuals in the US, such as those gunning for Federal Reserve Bank senior posts who believe fears of bubbles are misplaced in a climate of high unemployment.

Headline inflation has been falling, but the sell-off in many countries’ bonds since mid-2012 indicates that inflationary expectations are now rising. That is, the market is arriving at the conclusion that if there is too much quantitative easing (QE) in the near term, and inflation could trend upwards in the medium term. Central banks may end up ‘behind the curve’, and they will be tightening monetary policy too late.

Ten year bond yields in a number of western economies have increased by an average 1.1% since mid-2012, as illustrated in the table below:

Recent increases in global bond rates

Country Historic Low When Yield at 12/11/13 Change
US 10 Year Bonds 1.39% July 2012 2.77% +1.38%
Australian 10 Year Bonds 2.69% July 2012 4.23% +1.54%
UK 10 Year Gilts 1.43% August 2012 2.64% +1.21%
German 10 Year Bunds 1.16% July 2012 1.79% +0.63%
French 10 Year Bonds 1.83% December 2012 2.56% +0.73%
Japanese 10 Year Bonds 0.61% March 2013 0.60% -0.01%
AVERAGE       +1.10%


These historical low bond yields should be looked at in the context of long term rates of inflation. The following chart shows both the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean rate of inflation from 1900 to 2011. In the US, Australia and the UK, these figures have averaged 3.0%, 3.9% and 4.1% respectively (averaging the two means).

Buying a 10 year bond on a yield at somewhere near half the long-term average rate of inflation is dangerous and yet such a strategy appears to have never been more popular.

Typically, buyers demand a premium of at least 2% above inflationary expectations. Even adjusting for the weak buying power of labour in these economies and associated lower wage growth, it seems reasonable to expect in normal circumstances for US 10 year bonds to trend up to 4.5% and for 10 year bonds in Australia and the UK to trend above 5.0%.

This not only has implications for bond buyers. All assets are ultimately valued on the basis of a discount rate that is in turn influenced by interest rates. The boom in bank share and property prices can be attributed to a fad - the chase for relatively higher yields. The above analysis suggests the fad, like all passing fashions, will come to an end.

QE wisdom questioned

The former Federal Reserve official Andrew Huszar managed the first round of the Fed's QE programme, purchasing $US1.25 trillion of mortgage-backed securities in 2009 and 2010. Huszar, who is also a former Morgan Stanley Managing Director, has penned an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal that questions the efficacy of the program that can be found here.

The executive summary to Huszar's column reads like a warning to complacent investors who believe that they can do nothing but be forced into chasing stocks and property for their relatively attractive income returns. Huszar concludes that:

  • the first round of QE provided only trivial relief for Main Street, but considerable relief for Wall Street. The banks have enjoyed lower wholesale credit costs, rising values on their security holdings, and large commissions from brokering most of the Fed's QE transactions
  • the first round of easing didn't make credit any more accessible for the average American, as banks were issuing fewer and fewer loans
  • the massive $US4 trillion of purchases may have only generated a return of as little as a quarter of a percentage point in US GDP growth
  • pumping money into financial markets has merely killed the need for urgency on Washington's part in confronting the structurally unsound nature of the US economy
  • it is expected that the programme will continue next year (see my article last week), as Ben Bernanke’s likely successor, Fed Vice Chairwoman, Janet Yellen, is supportive of QE
  • QE has become Wall Street’s ‘too big to fail’ policy.

Andrew Huszar became disillusioned with the (lack of) independence of the Federal Reserve and returned to the private sector after the first round of QE was completed. The apology for his role in the programme serves as a timely warning that the US economy is likely to wake up with a headache when the party inevitably ends.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller, ‘Value.able’.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Beyond the hype, a beginner’s guide to QE

RBA justifies its QE to QT, but did it drive inflation?

How active bond funds hunt for value in fixed income

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.