Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 490

What to do about our distorted relationship with money

There is no logical reason this chart should ever go into negative territory. That it has is a clear indication that the market’s relationship with money has become distorted and has been for a long time. 

What is a term premium?

This is the compensation you get for agreeing to lock up your money, for taking on 'time risk'. The longer you lock your money away, the more time there is for unexpected things to go wrong and the more of a ‘premium’ or added incentive you should be paid to make it worth your while.

In a normal economic environment, you should get paid more to hold a bond that matures in 10 years than you do to hold 10 one-year bonds, for example, because you’re taking on that extra risk.

Currently, as the chart shows, investors must pay for the privilege of locking up their money for 10 years in US government bonds.

This suggests that investors don’t think any premium is required; that essentially money today is no more valuable than money tomorrow, or next year or in the next decade and as a result they aren’t demanding extra rewards to offset that long-term uncertainty.

This extremely loose money, or negative term premium, environment has tended to favour growth stocks because investors have to defer their rewards, eschewing profits now in the hope of significant growth in the future. A decision that seems sound when there is an expectation that the future holds no additional risks and the alternatives are established, boring (albeit cash-generative) businesses that aren’t likely to grow dramatically from where they are today.

Has this ever happened before?

As the chart shows, the term premium has recorded lows before, particularly in the 1960-70s and the late 1990s-early 2000s. Those two periods were similar to what we’re seeing today, where there were loose money environments that coincided with very frothy market conditions that created a bubble.

Although the term premium did not fall into negative territory, as we’re witnessing now, these extremely loose money environments led to underinvestment by ‘real economy’ businesses, those that make or produce actual things, like energy, paper or cement, while more capital made its way towards ‘new’ economy businesses such as technology.

This cycle of underinvestment in the ‘real economy’ led to lower supply, which led to higher prices, which led to higher inflation.

A similar environment is evident today, as seen by the current energy supply shortages. But we’re facing even greater challenges than previous periods given that we have the added burden of external factors such as transitioning to clean energy to reduce CO2 emissions.

What happens next?

The good news is these cycles eventually unwind, but this can take a long time. For example, on the energy side, it took around 8-12 years in the 1970s to rebuild production and alleviate shortages.

Until that happens, those shortages remain inflationary as low supply and high demand will push prices higher, which in turn drives inflation. Luckily, this metric is a key focus for most central banks and to try and curb inflation rises they will look to tighten the money supply – usually through higher interest rates. This in turn will lead to a more rational term premium as people will start to value money today more highly, leading to a focus on more essential items and capital being allocated more efficiently in the real economy.

What does this mean for investors?

A tighter policy stance from central banks will be negative for asset prices, which means general stock market returns might disappoint. That means stock selection becomes critical. 

Currently there is a significant gap between the value and growth stocks in the market. This is because in a loose money environment valuations become dispersed along specific lines and in each of the periods we’ve discussed, this fracture in the market has been between ‘old economy’ and ‘new economy’ businesses.

The willingness of investors to focus on the slim chance of a big future payoff rather than money today, can drive speculative capital into new economy or growth assets that then see the share price rise and their ability to invest in new projects increase. Meanwhile, the reverse is true for businesses whose share prices have been left in the dust, for example, these old economy, lower growth companies. A low share price means they have little incentive to invest in new projects, which affects production and supply.

However, as the term premium returns to normal leading to better rewards for taking on longer-term risk, the situation above should reverse which should see the extreme valuation gap between the value and growth stocks starting to close.

In this type of environment, it’s therefore important that investors understand what a business is worth and what you should pay for it in order to generate satisfactory returns and avoid overpaying for a stock.

This tends to bode well for active stock selection, and more so for value driven investors who can take advantage of this mispricing as they are more focused on the underlying value and fundamentals of a business.

 

Shane Woldendorp, Investment Specialist, Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information at a point in time and not personal financial or investment advice. It should not be used as a guide to invest or trade and does not take into account the specific investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person. The Orbis Funds may take a different view depending on facts and circumstances. For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The best income-generating assets for your portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.