Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 223

Housing: balance in our most cyclical sector

Based on current population growth in Australia, we are building too many houses. However, we are also still catching up on a long period of underbuilding, and with population growth picking up once again, the emerging construction downturn may be more gentle than feared. This article looks at the level of residential building activity against the demand from growth in households, and provides an overall assessment of the market.

The cyclical nature of housing

The housing sector tends to go through periods of overbuilding and underbuilding. We estimate that there was noticeable underbuilding from 2006 to 2013 which helped to fuel recent rapid house price growth. However, since 2014 we have been in a phase where we are building more homes than underlying need would suggest, as shown in the chart below. This growth in dwelling commencements has raised fears of oversupply, particularly in some capital city apartment markets. But overall, Australia’s housing market is still characterised by relatively low vacancy rates and positive rental growth.

With an upturn in national population growth and an easing in forward indicators of housing construction based on residential building approvals, the gap between building activity and underlying demand looks set to close.

Dwelling supply and demand in Australia

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Deloitte Access Economics

Building activity moderating as growth driver

Residential building approvals peaked in the second half of 2016 and have retreated modestly since. This has been driven largely by a fall in apartment approvals, particularly in the high-rise segment. The fall in residential building approvals likely reflects factors such as tighter developer financing, higher taxes on foreign investors (levied at the state level), fears of oversupply and limited future price growth. This indicates residential building activity, which has been a driver of economic growth, is set to moderate.

Against this moderating supply outlook, population growth has surprised on the upside. Spurred by an increase in net overseas migration, national population growth was over 389,000 over the year ending March 2017 (up from over 343,000 the year to March 2016). This has tempered expectations of an oversupply of housing, although dwelling completions will remain elevated in the short term.

The supply-demand balance has been an important driver of recent strong house price growth, along with low mortgage rates and strong investor interest. CoreLogic’s Home Value Index shows price performance varies significantly across the country. Long-time standouts Sydney (+10.5%) and Melbourne (+12.1%) have continued to record robust growth over the year ending September 2017. The relatively affordable Hobart (+14.3%) has seen substantial price growth amid a healthier local economy while the Canberra market (+7.8%) has also been a solid performer. Other markets have been more mixed, with Perth (-2.9%) and Darwin (-4.7%) still experiencing falling prices amid challenging local economic conditions.

More recently however, national price growth looks to have slowed, with CoreLogic’s five capital city aggregate up by a more sedate 0.6% over the past quarter, or around 2.5% price growth on an annualised basis. This may reflect a range of factors domestically, such as stretched affordability (particularly in Sydney and Melbourne) in a low wage growth environment, tighter lending standards (and a crackdown on interest-only loans) and increases in mortgage rates by major lenders. It may also reflect an easing in foreign investment, with higher foreign investor taxes (for example, New South Wales’ stamp duty surcharge for foreign investors recently increased from 4 to 8%) and a continued clamp down from Chinese authorities on capital flight.

Good prospects for balanced supply and demand

As a result, while there are still many risks in Australia’s housing market (and far too much household debt for comfort), the short-term outlook might be more about balance than wild swings – and prices levelling out at a time when housing activity moderates and population growth remains buoyant.

 

David Rumbens is a Partner and Andrew Ponsonby is a Senior Analyst at Deloitte Access Economics. This article is reproduced with permission.

 

  •   19 October 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Where to put your money these days

Introduction to the Market Monitor

Residential investment property fails simple valuation test

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.